I have two nice looking VFO's for sale:

1. Heath HG-10 excellent in appearance, all original, not way to test it,
$75.00
2. Eico 755 excellent in appearance, all original, no way to test it, $75.00

Mike at (979) 696-4400 hm or (979) 255-3544 cell.

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:49:29 -0600, "Mike" wrote:

I have two nice looking VFO's for sale:

1. Heath HG-10 excellent in appearance, all original, not way to test it,
$75.00
no way to pay that

2. Eico 755 excellent in appearance, all original, no way to test it, $75.00
no way to pay that....

On 11/22/05 2:09 PM, in article ,
" wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:49:29 -0600, "Mike" wrote:

I have two nice looking VFO's for sale:

1. Heath HG-10 excellent in appearance, all original, not way to test it,
$75.00
no way to pay that

2. Eico 755 excellent in appearance, all original, no way to test it, $75.00
no way to pay that....


Gee! I missed the part in the original post that asked for opinions. I'm
sure we all think it's unfortunate you are unable to afford either of them.
Better luck on something less expensive next time.

Don

I think he was saying it's way too much money for items that might not work.
And he's right.
"Don Bowey" wrote in message
...
On 11/22/05 2:09 PM, in article
,
" wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:49:29 -0600, "Mike" wrote:

I have two nice looking VFO's for sale:

1. Heath HG-10 excellent in appearance, all original, not way to test
it,
$75.00
no way to pay that

2. Eico 755 excellent in appearance, all original, no way to test it,
$75.00
no way to pay that....


Gee! I missed the part in the original post that asked for opinions. I'm
sure we all think it's unfortunate you are unable to afford either of
them.
Better luck on something less expensive next time.

Don

On 11/23/05 3:18 AM, in article
, "Andy Bullington"
wrote:

I think he was saying it's way too much money for items that might not work.
And he's right.

He and you _might_ be correct, but _maybe_ not. "Too much" says more about
you than it does the OP.

If you don't want it, don't buy it. Nobody needs to know what you can
afford.

Don


"Don Bowey" wrote in message
...
On 11/22/05 2:09 PM, in article
,
" wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:49:29 -0600, "Mike" wrote:

I have two nice looking VFO's for sale:

1. Heath HG-10 excellent in appearance, all original, not way to test
it,
$75.00
no way to pay that

2. Eico 755 excellent in appearance, all original, no way to test it,
$75.00
no way to pay that....


Gee! I missed the part in the original post that asked for opinions. I'm
sure we all think it's unfortunate you are unable to afford either of
them.
Better luck on something less expensive next time.

Don

The items seem overpriced compared to similair items that have gone recently
on QTH.net and E-bay. I said nothing whatsoever about what I could afford.

"Don Bowey" wrote in message
...
On 11/23/05 3:18 AM, in article
, "Andy Bullington"
wrote:

I think he was saying it's way too much money for items that might not
work.
And he's right.

He and you _might_ be correct, but _maybe_ not. "Too much" says more
about
you than it does the OP.

If you don't want it, don't buy it. Nobody needs to know what you can
afford.

Don


"Don Bowey" wrote in message
...
On 11/22/05 2:09 PM, in article
,
" wrote:

On Tue, 22 Nov 2005 10:49:29 -0600, "Mike" wrote:

I have two nice looking VFO's for sale:

1. Heath HG-10 excellent in appearance, all original, not way to test
it,
$75.00
no way to pay that

2. Eico 755 excellent in appearance, all original, no way to test it,
$75.00
no way to pay that....


Gee! I missed the part in the original post that asked for opinions.
I'm
sure we all think it's unfortunate you are unable to afford either of
them.
Better luck on something less expensive next time.

Don

Gee! I missed the part in the original post that asked for opinions. I'm
sure we all think it's unfortunate you are unable to afford either of them.
Better luck on something less expensive next time.

Don

Well then, straighen up and pay attention!!!

IMNSHO, posts like this should read:

"untested, as-is"

and the other feller was correct.....it's TOO MUCH MONEY
for untested vfozzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

73

On 11/23/05 6:16 AM, in article ,
" wrote:



Gee! I missed the part in the original post that asked for opinions. I'm
sure we all think it's unfortunate you are unable to afford either of them.
Better luck on something less expensive next time.

Don

Well then, straighen up and pay attention!!!

IMNSHO, posts like this should read:

"untested, as-is"

and the other feller was correct.....it's TOO MUCH MONEY
for untested vfozzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

73

In my opinion, because I use my brain a bit, it does say untested, as is.

Are you the local phraseology cop?

I don't care what you can afford.

"Don Bowey" wrote in message
...
On 11/23/05 6:16 AM, in article
,
" wrote:


In my opinion, because I use my brain a bit, it does say untested, as is.

Are you the local phraseology cop?

I don't care what you can afford.



Is that your stuff? You seem to care an awful lot for being an uninterested
observer.

wrote:


IMNSHO, posts like this should read:

"untested, as-is"


73

You are right there. Too much Ebay mentality. Used to be it either
worked or didnt.

I recently bought a Viking Ranger at a hamfest. I asked if it worked.
The guy said he was selling it for a friend who said it worked when he
last used it many years ago.

In other words as far as I was concerned it didnt work and payed
accordingly.

Lazy Senior