Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() In article , art clemons wrote: Dave Boland wrote: Anyone KNOW why radio stations insist on using flash for audio instead of normal audio formats like Windows, MP3, etc? I see no advantage since it won't work on Apple products and HTML 5 has audio built in. Just makes the listener's job more difficult. Makes no sense. The most likely reason flash is used for streaming is that it is OS and browser independent. So is MP3. Flash is overkill for audio streaming. Patty |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patty Winter had written:
| | In article , | art clemons wrote: | Dave Boland wrote: | | Anyone KNOW why radio stations insist on using flash for audio instead | of normal audio formats like Windows, MP3, etc? I see no advantage | since it won't work on Apple products and HTML 5 has audio built in. | Just makes the listener's job more difficult. Makes no sense. | | The most likely reason flash is used for streaming is that it is OS and | browser independent. | | So is MP3. Flash is overkill for audio streaming. Any codec is OS and browser-independent if there is a version of it available for the desired platform. For some Linux distros (e.g. Fedora), one has to go to additional effort to get mp3 support. That said, the radio-station streaming practice that I abhor is the insistence on special clients, often functional only on Windows systems, that are there to try to push garish advertising at you. They are bloated and pointless. An excellent use of Flash is the online player for France-Info (the national all-news network in France, www.france-info.com). It lets you know the name of the current segment, along with the names of those immediately preceding (so that you can go back and listen to them) and those that are coming up. So if a station uses Flash for something more than just being a player and pushing ads, then I think it could be a good thing. -- Mark Roberts - E-Mail address is valid but I don't use Google Groups If you quote, please quote only relevant passages and not the whole article. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Patty Winter wrote:
So is MP3. Flash is overkill for audio streaming. MP3 however cannot for example also carry let's say a weather forecast or allow a station to promote upcoming programming. I note that many public radio stations with streaming via MP3 (m3u for example) don't always manage to insert their reminder that streaming costs money and is paid for by the contributors to the station without somehow not managing to provide the content after the reminder. It can be really annoying if you have contributed to that station but cannot get a reliable connection without reconnecting several times. Some commercial stations with flash also offer ads and if that helps offset some of the cost of streaming, so be it. As much as I consider flash players bloated and at times a security risk, flash has been reliable delivering audio for me. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Streaming Audio | General | |||
Delay streaming | Broadcasting | |||
Really Big Deal, Flash Flash (ot) | Shortwave | |||
streaming? | Broadcasting | |||
internet radio/streaming/streaming on demand/ downloads etc. | Broadcasting |