| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
David Eduardo wrote:
"Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... The other thing that REALLY turns me off is when they run out of things to say/do and start saying "News Talk 1250, WTMA" over and over and over ad nauseum. "News Talk 730, WSC" (WSCC is more ashamed of its call letters. Being a Clear Channel station, they think they should be able to use RCA's WSC station call, assigned to marine band use.) Except for the legal ID, the station can call itself anything it wants, as long as what they want is not trade marked by someone else. I beg to differ. If anyone called the FCC on that Central Pennsylvania station that id'd itself as WHOT-FM all of the time except at the top of the hour, would the FCC not spank the station? (I'm referring to a station that was mentioned in the Airwaves Digest a few years ago. WHOT-FM is the legal callsign of a station at 101.1 in Youngstown, Ohio, and has been for years.) Over on Clear Channel's WSCC, ol' Dan says the call letters/frequency nearly continuously, now. Of course, he says WSC, not their real call until the hour when they have a quickie spot to satisfy the FCC. So? They have named the station WSC to make it easy to remember. This is like WWWE in Cleveland (now WTAM) using 3-WE as an identifier. Bull. There is no way anyone will mistake "3WE" for someone's call letters. Nor will anyone mistake "Power 106", "Hot 97", or "Z92.5" for another station's calls. It's *not* the same thing. No one but you cares. It *is* misleading and shouldn't be allowed. I just don't care enough to complain. You are kidding, right? Except for the legal ID, a station can use any identifier it wants. So if I license a station and ID myself properly as, say, KIYS at the top of the hour, and I'm at 102.7, but during the rest of the hour I call myself 102.7 KIIS, no one will care? There is, of course, a station on 102.7 with those calls. Wink 106 FM in Corning, New York, used to play that game a few years ago... I'd hear it when I was driving through Corning on the way to Albany or Boston. The jingles said "Wink 106, W-I-N-K". WINK-FM, if I'm not mistaken, is in Tampa, or was a few years ago anyhow. Even at the top of the hour, the DJ would ID the station correctly ("You're listening to WNKI, Corning/Elmira") and right after that you would hear the rest of the jingle, which used the wrong calls (WINK). I never cared enough to file a complaint with the FCC, but it's still not right. I'd be ****ed if I owned or worked for the stations whose calls were being improperly used. -- JustThe.net Internet & New Media Services 22674 Motnocab Road * Apple Valley, CA 92307-1950 Steve Sobol, Geek In Charge * 888.480.4NET (4638) * |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
Steven J Sobol wrote in
: I beg to differ. If anyone called the FCC on that Central Pennsylvania station that id'd itself as WHOT-FM all of the time except at the top of the hour, would the FCC not spank the station? (I'm referring to a station that was mentioned in the Airwaves Digest a few years ago. WHOT-FM is the legal callsign of a station at 101.1 in Youngstown, Ohio, and has been for years.) This was the old 103.9 WHTO Muncy, PA. Muncy, PA is east of Williamsport, PA along I-180. All this would have been going on in the early 90's as I was going to school in Lock Haven (west of Williamsport) at the time and 103.9 was the best Top 40 station around (for the area). I remember that they would use "103.9 WHOT" when the jock would talk on the air, but at the top of the hour Legal ID, the fast-talking voiceover guy would use the proper "WHTO Muncy, Williamsport". I also have an old bumper sticker of theirs that reads "103.9 WHOT is Red Hot". By the mid to late 90's 103.9 had moved to another frequency and moved their location to somewhere southeast of Williamsport. I assume for better coverage of the area. I remember when I listened to the station and wanted to call them looking for a phone number under WHOT and not seeing anything. I don't know how I finally figured out it was WHTO, but what I do remember was I was confused! Was it WHTO or WHOT? I didn't know for sure, but I did know I was listening to 103.9 FM. I guess that counts for something. A question related to all of this: In the Williamsport ratings, who would get credit if someone wrote down in their diary that they were listening to WHOT? WHOT at the time was not in Williamsport, it was elsewhere - Youngstown, Ohio as Steven Sobol mentioned. On the same vien would 103.9 WHOT or just 103.9 give credit to WHTO - the real 103.9 in Muncy (Williamsport)? Obviously, a radiophile who put down WHTO would do the station best since they'd definitely get credit. To me, a situation like this is where a radio station shoots itself in the foot by using calls on the air that are completely different than those that they are legally assigned. It confuses the average listener, but it would seem to me that it really confuses the ratings book which is what all radio stations live an die by. Mike |
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 22 Dec 2003 17:53:53 GMT, "M. Hale"
wrote: A question related to all of this: In the Williamsport ratings, who would get credit if someone wrote down in their diary that they were listening to WHOT? WHOT at the time was not in Williamsport, it was elsewhere - Youngstown, Ohio as Steven Sobol mentioned. On the same vien would 103.9 WHOT or just 103.9 give credit to WHTO - the real 103.9 in Muncy (Williamsport)? Obviously, a radiophile who put down WHTO would do the station best since they'd definitely get credit. If WHTO had "WHOT" registered with Arbitron as their on-air slogan, they'd get credit for any "WHOT" in the diaries. Probably full credit, as the Youngstown station's signal comes nowhere near the Williamsport market. They'd also get credit if someone marked down "103.9", since they automatically get credit for on-frequency mentions. So, if they registered "WHOT" and someone marked down "103.9 WHOT", there's no doubt who they're hearing. Mike |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
"M. Hale" wrote in message ... .. A question related to all of this: In the Williamsport ratings, who would get credit if someone wrote down in their diary that they were listening to WHOT? The station probably registered WHOT as a slogan, along with the Hot moniker. Since there is no other similar call in the MSA (Metro Survey Area or Metropolitan statistical Area), the one with the fake calls used as a slogan will get credit as long as Arbitron was notified. WHOT at the time was not in Williamsport, it was elsewhere - Youngstown, Ohio as Steven Sobol mentioned. On the same vien would 103.9 WHOT or just 103.9 give credit to WHTO - the real 103.9 in Muncy (Williamsport)? Obviously, a radiophile who put down WHTO would do the station best since they'd definitely get credit. Again, if the staiton registered "WHOT - Hot" they would get credit. In general, most diary entries are by frequency, so the point is almost moot. To me, a situation like this is where a radio station shoots itself in the foot by using calls on the air that are completely different than those that they are legally assigned. It confuses the average listener, but it would seem to me that it really confuses the ratings book which is what all radio stations live an die by. Since no one else uses the calls in the market area, I don't think the listener would be confused at all. |
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven J Sobol" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... The other thing that REALLY turns me off is when they run out of things to say/do and start saying "News Talk 1250, WTMA" over and over and over ad nauseum. "News Talk 730, WSC" (WSCC is more ashamed of its call letters. Being a Clear Channel station, they think they should be able to use RCA's WSC station call, assigned to marine band use.) Except for the legal ID, the station can call itself anything it wants, as long as what they want is not trade marked by someone else. I beg to differ. If anyone called the FCC on that Central Pennsylvania station that id'd itself as WHOT-FM all of the time except at the top of the hour, would the FCC not spank the station? (I'm referring to a station that was mentioned in the Airwaves Digest a few years ago. WHOT-FM is the legal callsign of a station at 101.1 in Youngstown, Ohio, and has been for years.) That is an interesting point, and one to ask in Florida, where a bunch of Clear Channel talkiers are all called "WFLA" except at the top of the hour. They are not networked, either. they only ID with real calls on top of hour. Or in Puerto Rico, where the news net of WKAQ (AM) has been called "WKAQ Radio Reloj" for 4 decades on a network of about 5 or 6 stations, some 24/7, and none IDing with true calls except onthe hour. I don't think a formal complaint has been made, although I know some DXers have written complaints of an informal type. Over on Clear Channel's WSCC, ol' Dan says the call letters/frequency nearly continuously, now. Of course, he says WSC, not their real call until the hour when they have a quickie spot to satisfy the FCC. So? They have named the station WSC to make it easy to remember. This is like WWWE in Cleveland (now WTAM) using 3-WE as an identifier. Bull. There is no way anyone will mistake "3WE" for someone's call letters. Nor will anyone mistake "Power 106", "Hot 97", or "Z92.5" for another station's calls. It's *not* the same thing. No one but you cares. It *is* misleading and shouldn't be allowed. I just don't care enough to complain. Since this has been going on for 4 decades with no action by the FCC, I guess they don't fcare, either. You are kidding, right? Except for the legal ID, a station can use any identifier it wants. So if I license a station and ID myself properly as, say, KIYS at the top of the hour, and I'm at 102.7, but during the rest of the hour I call myself 102.7 KIIS, no one will care? There is, of course, a station on 102.7 with those calls. Anyone at 102.7 can call themselves 102.7 Kiss, but only if they license the Kiss name from the mark holder. Wink 106 FM in Corning, New York, used to play that game a few years ago... I'd hear it when I was driving through Corning on the way to Albany or Boston. The jingles said "Wink 106, W-I-N-K". WINK-FM, if I'm not mistaken, is in Tampa, or was a few years ago anyhow. Even at the top of the hour, the DJ would ID the station correctly ("You're listening to WNKI, Corning/Elmira") and right after that you would hear the rest of the jingle, which used the wrong calls (WINK). I'll bet it would be hard for anyone to say that the station, whose name is Wink, could not spell wink so diary keepers would know how to write it down. I never cared enough to file a complaint with the FCC, but it's still not right. I'd be ****ed if I owned or worked for the stations whose calls were being improperly used. As long as the signals don't overlap, it probably makes no difference to them unless they have an interest in preserving a national service mark. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
On 22 Dec 2003 14:50:30 GMT, Steven J Sobol
wrote: David Eduardo wrote: "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... The other thing that REALLY turns me off is when they run out of things to say/do and start saying "News Talk 1250, WTMA" over and over and over ad nauseum. "News Talk 730, WSC" (WSCC is more ashamed of its call letters. Being a Clear Channel station, they think they should be able to use RCA's WSC station call, assigned to marine band use.) Except for the legal ID, the station can call itself anything it wants, as long as what they want is not trade marked by someone else. I beg to differ. If anyone called the FCC on that Central Pennsylvania station that id'd itself as WHOT-FM all of the time except at the top of the hour, would the FCC not spank the station? (I'm referring to a station that was mentioned in the Airwaves Digest a few years ago. WHOT-FM is the legal callsign of a station at 101.1 in Youngstown, Ohio, and has been for years.) I'm going to start calling myself WCSC on 75 meters......it must be ok.....(c; Larry W4CSC NNNN |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
In article , Larry W4CSC wrote:
I'm going to start calling myself WCSC on 75 meters......it must be ok.....(c; Why not? You got the licence, Larry. It's perfectly legal...and if you were talking with other ham radio operators, they'd recognize you instantly. :-) -- Sven Weil New York City, U.S.A. |
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
|
"Steven J Sobol" wrote in message
... Wink 106 FM in Corning, New York, used to play that game a few years ago... I'd hear it when I was driving through Corning on the way to Albany or Boston. The jingles said "Wink 106, W-I-N-K". WINK-FM, if I'm not mistaken, is in Tampa, or was a few years ago anyhow. Even at the top of the hour, the DJ would ID the station correctly ("You're listening to WNKI, Corning/Elmira") and right after that you would hear the rest of the jingle, which used the wrong calls (WINK). I never cared enough to file a complaint with the FCC, but it's still not right. I'd be ****ed if I owned or worked for the stations whose calls were being improperly used. I've been out of the business for awhile, but isn't there a rule prohibiting a station from misleading or pretending to be another station? This wouldn't apply to the WSC case that started this thread, but the 102.7 KIIS scenerio would. Paul Jensen Florida's Emerald Coast |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|