Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steven J Sobol" wrote in message ... David Eduardo wrote: "Larry W4CSC" wrote in message ... The other thing that REALLY turns me off is when they run out of things to say/do and start saying "News Talk 1250, WTMA" over and over and over ad nauseum. "News Talk 730, WSC" (WSCC is more ashamed of its call letters. Being a Clear Channel station, they think they should be able to use RCA's WSC station call, assigned to marine band use.) Except for the legal ID, the station can call itself anything it wants, as long as what they want is not trade marked by someone else. I beg to differ. If anyone called the FCC on that Central Pennsylvania station that id'd itself as WHOT-FM all of the time except at the top of the hour, would the FCC not spank the station? (I'm referring to a station that was mentioned in the Airwaves Digest a few years ago. WHOT-FM is the legal callsign of a station at 101.1 in Youngstown, Ohio, and has been for years.) That is an interesting point, and one to ask in Florida, where a bunch of Clear Channel talkiers are all called "WFLA" except at the top of the hour. They are not networked, either. they only ID with real calls on top of hour. Or in Puerto Rico, where the news net of WKAQ (AM) has been called "WKAQ Radio Reloj" for 4 decades on a network of about 5 or 6 stations, some 24/7, and none IDing with true calls except onthe hour. I don't think a formal complaint has been made, although I know some DXers have written complaints of an informal type. Over on Clear Channel's WSCC, ol' Dan says the call letters/frequency nearly continuously, now. Of course, he says WSC, not their real call until the hour when they have a quickie spot to satisfy the FCC. So? They have named the station WSC to make it easy to remember. This is like WWWE in Cleveland (now WTAM) using 3-WE as an identifier. Bull. There is no way anyone will mistake "3WE" for someone's call letters. Nor will anyone mistake "Power 106", "Hot 97", or "Z92.5" for another station's calls. It's *not* the same thing. No one but you cares. It *is* misleading and shouldn't be allowed. I just don't care enough to complain. Since this has been going on for 4 decades with no action by the FCC, I guess they don't fcare, either. You are kidding, right? Except for the legal ID, a station can use any identifier it wants. So if I license a station and ID myself properly as, say, KIYS at the top of the hour, and I'm at 102.7, but during the rest of the hour I call myself 102.7 KIIS, no one will care? There is, of course, a station on 102.7 with those calls. Anyone at 102.7 can call themselves 102.7 Kiss, but only if they license the Kiss name from the mark holder. Wink 106 FM in Corning, New York, used to play that game a few years ago... I'd hear it when I was driving through Corning on the way to Albany or Boston. The jingles said "Wink 106, W-I-N-K". WINK-FM, if I'm not mistaken, is in Tampa, or was a few years ago anyhow. Even at the top of the hour, the DJ would ID the station correctly ("You're listening to WNKI, Corning/Elmira") and right after that you would hear the rest of the jingle, which used the wrong calls (WINK). I'll bet it would be hard for anyone to say that the station, whose name is Wink, could not spell wink so diary keepers would know how to write it down. I never cared enough to file a complaint with the FCC, but it's still not right. I'd be ****ed if I owned or worked for the stations whose calls were being improperly used. As long as the signals don't overlap, it probably makes no difference to them unless they have an interest in preserving a national service mark. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|