Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Eddie Haskel wrote:
I whole-heartedly agree with you on your findings "Umarc". It really has nothing to offer the local **FM** listener. HOWEVER....in the Southern California market it would kick ass on the "AM" market with a vengence.A lot of the local AM outlets have sold out to the hispanic market because AM radio sounds so bad for music.Considering how much better AM IBOC sounds than analog, and the fact that the mexican government thinks it's cool to fire up 10Khz away from US stations..IBOC is just what the renagade beaner-blasters deserve. My limited experience with AM IBOC is that it seems to sound worse than the better quality AM analogue signals, and of course it makes it impossible to put out a wideband analogue signal. It's also going to be much more subject to adjacent channel interference from Mexico. I wish I could say IBOC would be the saviour of AM, because AM certainly could use one. I could at least believe IBOC will result in better quality sound for the average listener on a cheap car radio listening in the daytime, and you can argue that this is where the profit is. I would like to see such stations like KNX,KFWB,KFI,KABC-AM (and some of the San Diego stations) push the IBOC music service, the data services and re-claim the 535-1710Khz band for use in the US of A.......Eddie I'd be interested to see them try. And I will say that stations that try IBOC are forced to clean up their antenna system and deal with group delay problems, which will certainly benefit them if they should decide to move back to wideband analogue operation. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|