Mark Howell had written:
| On 15 Jun 2004 05:42:55 GMT, Alan Freed wrote:
|
| There is also some evidence that IBOC interference can affect home
| metro groundwave coverage of adjacent channel stations.
|
| But not much. I can listen to the 1050 in the Riverside market within 10
| miles of the KTNQ 50 kw IBOC site.
|
| I have to laugh at that (nothing personal, DE). More of this
| selective "acceptable interference" while NAB Eddie and his thugs
| continue their audacious lies about third adjacent LPFM.
|
| LPFM is to Eddie what Weapons Of Mass Destruction are to George W.
|
| Carry on.
|
| You have a point. As far as I'm concerned the NAB is correct about
| LPFM, and dead wrong about IBOC, especially AM IBOC. But whichever
| side of the debate you take, they're being inconsistent.
|
They're being inconsistent from a technical and engineering point of
view. From a protectionist point of view, they're being quite
consistent. It's an "I got mine and I'm going to keep it" stance,
pure and simple.

--
Mark Roberts |"I've posted this so many times I ought to have a
Oakland, Cal.| keyboard macro...."
NO HTML MAIL | -- Scott Fybush, on a radio-info message board