Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Mark Roberts wrote:
If AM IBOC is such hot stuff, why is it restricted to daytime hours only? Because the group delay that is the result of the uneven ionosphere prevents it from being decoded properly when the signal is received on skip, and the amount of stuff coming over the horizon on skip prevents it from being properly received when it's being received on groundwave at night. I can now hear the damage it does to the analog signal on KCBS. The effect varies from radio to radio, but on almost all of them, the noise floor goes up when IBOC is on. I wouldn't be bothered by this so much if the digital system actually sounded good. But the audio quality of the digital carrier is actually a lot worse than good analogue AM. It's like listening to Cylon Warriors. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Scott Dorsey had written:
| Mark Roberts wrote: | | If AM IBOC is such hot stuff, why is it restricted to daytime hours only? | | Because the group delay that is the result of the uneven ionosphere prevents | it from being decoded properly when the signal is received on skip, and the | amount of stuff coming over the horizon on skip prevents it from being | properly received when it's being received on groundwave at night. I didn't quite expect an answer to a rhetorical question -- but it does point to a very fundamental flaw in the scheme. -- Mark Roberts |"Bush campaign ads boast that 1.5 million jobs were added in the Oakland, Cal.| last 10 months, as if that were a remarkable achievement. It NO HTML MAIL | isn't. During the Clinton years, the economy added 236,000 jobs in an average month." -- Paul Krugman, NY Times, 7-6-2004 |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In article ,
Mark Roberts wrote: Scott Dorsey had written: | Mark Roberts wrote: | | If AM IBOC is such hot stuff, why is it restricted to daytime hours only? | | Because the group delay that is the result of the uneven ionosphere prevents | it from being decoded properly when the signal is received on skip, and the | amount of stuff coming over the horizon on skip prevents it from being | properly received when it's being received on groundwave at night. I didn't quite expect an answer to a rhetorical question -- but it does point to a very fundamental flaw in the scheme. Sorry, I can't seem to find Bob Orban's reply to this. But I agree with Bob that the encoding scheme is very robust about dealing with group delay issues. Even so, I have found the actual skip performance poor to the point of unusability. Bob, do you have a citation on any actual measurements of this stuff? Ionosonde data is easy to get, so it should be really easy to build a simulation of ionospheric distortions in matlab or something, even if you just take into account group delay and multiple reflections. Has anyone actually done any simulations on the current encoder to see how it survives under various simulated skip conditions? I'd be curious to see which of the various skip characteristics is the most serious issue. --scott -- "C'est un Nagra. C'est suisse, et tres, tres precis." |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|