LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #7   Report Post  
Old September 5th 04, 11:14 PM
Peter H.
 
Posts: n/a
Default



I assume that 35 kW is for the backup tower, although the question remains why
35 kW? Did the FCC limit the power because of interference caused by high
angle radiation ...


That is the consensus view ... the high-angle radiation towards co-channel
stations with the short auxiliary and 35 kW was about the same as with the tall
main, and 50 kW.

I guess under a CP case, a Class A is no longer allowed to increase its signal
towards a station of lesser class [ * ] .

Under the old rules, a Class A could not increase its signal towards a station
of the same class.

For this situation, WSAI had to install a DA which protected WWKB/1520 and
ZNS-1/1540, to about 40 kW. Before, it sent more than 50 kW towards those two
Class As.

[ * ] Look at WOR's CP DA ... it must provide substantially greater protection
to CKVM, and CKVM has been dark for some time, although it is still notified.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems Paul Policy 0 January 10th 05 06:41 PM
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Boatanchors 20 December 16th 04 08:51 AM
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Homebrew 9 December 13th 04 12:55 AM
Wanted: Power Supply for TR-4C KA9S-3_Jeff Boatanchors 0 December 8th 04 10:31 PM
More power questions Jack Twilley General 0 November 14th 03 09:31 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:11 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017