Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Lex-Lutor" wrote in message ... I'm interested in real results between this two antennas, urban area, same power, same high etc. Running circular we have only 50% of power, compared to normal dipole, but there are many positive feedbacks about circular polarization in urban area! I did extensive empirical testing in Quito, Ecuador in the mid 60's on HCTM1, using both horizontal and vertical polarization. I ended up with only vertical, which reduced the multipath from the reflection of the hills and mountains considerably. At that time, HCTM1, 95.1, was the only FM on the air in that city of 700,000 lying in a valley in the Andes, so it was a good test of signal. Since we were the only FM for about 1000 miles around, we could do pretty much whatever we wanted. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Discone antenna plans | Antenna | |||
The "TRICK" to TV 'type' Coax Cable [Shielded] SWL Loop Antennas {RHF} | Antenna | |||
Help -- Need Installation Advice for Vertical Antenna | Antenna | |||
Outdoor Scanner antenna and eventually a reference to SW reception | Shortwave |