PING AUK OT Just How Wrong IS Ward Hardman. Not as wrong as the Doofus of Masturbation.
I was busily flonking away in alt.usenet.kooks, when The Goddess Eris
Herself suddenly made me reply to Ward Hardmanu FreeSpeechStore wrote: Outing personal info in subject lines, no matter who gave you "permission" is k00ky. How the **** do you know that the real Ward Hardman directed you to it? How do you know that it wasn't a personal, real-life enemy of his, making a cowardly attempt to get some other k00k to harass Ward? Duh! Maybe everyone on usenet is really JFK. Maybe there is no Ward Hardman. Not the point. You have no ****ing idea if anyone is who they say they are, on usenet -- that's the whole point of /posting/ to usenet -- anonymity. Legalnames and nicknames, they're all the same here, because no one can prove anything (without delving into private ISP records). So outing personal info is the same as telling anyone who might ever have a grudge against your victim exactly how to stalk them (in addition to being a cowardly means of getting back at someone you don't like, for whatever reason). That makes you an accessory before the fact, if anything ever happens to Ward, so you better pray nothing ever does happen, asswipe. Anyway, subnormal underage fellator of livestock, I haven't outed personal info in subject lines, except when reproducing subject lines when replying. So you're a willing accomplice to outing. Scum. Filth. I have no idea what you're farting about. Are you a Star Trek nut lost in cyberspace? We(tinw) the kookologists and kook-hunters of alt.usenet.kooks make a practice of seeking out and diagnosing net.k00ks, and you are now one of our subjects. I still have no idea what you're farting about. Are you a scientologist on acid? Why do you crosspost to alaska and mj? Scientologists are k00ks. Their entire religion is based on a pack of lies, backed up by various means of intimidation, as with Xianity, Islam, and Judaism -- so no, we're not them. We(tinw) analyse k00ks such as yourself, and when we(tinw) decide that a given k00k is worthy of recognition, we(tinw) hand out awards to them, such as Kook of the Month, Clueless Newbie otM, Coward otM, the Golden Killfile, and many others. Here's a portion of the FAQ: From http://www.netcabal.com/auk/faq.html ============================================== 1. What is this newsgroup, alt.usenet.kooks (AUK)? A mass of electrons spread out upon bandwidth scattered across the globe for the express purpose of separating the wheat from the chaff of the net. 2. This is a joke, right? RIGHT?!! No more a joke than the fact that ISPs let people on every day who have nothing better to do than annoy their neighbors enough to win by popular vote silly little awards created for just such buffoons as them. 3. What's this newsgroup for? The newsgroup alt.usenet.kooks is for the discovery and discussion of Kooks on Usenet and the Internet. These people are known technically as net.kooks. 4. What's this newsgroup NOT for? This group exists for recreational Kookology, not for Very Personal Vendetta. It is not to be used for general harassment of someone, or for net abuse such as spamming and flooding and cancelbombing in an attempt to gain vengeance on someone or get the denizens of AUK to shut up. Either way, it won't work, it's very messy, "Bob" will give you triple your money back, and you don't get a life. Also, we [tinw] are not in the business of harassing the vulnerable or the insane. Occasionally an apparent net.kook proves to be genuinely ill. In such cases the person is disqualified from winning awards and other posters are asked to avoid exarcerbating his or her problems. Similarly, trolling or kook-hunting in support groups is strongly discouraged. 5. Who let this newsgroup in here, and why wasn't I notified? That's what you get for hogging the Beer Fund. (Here you can view the control message that started it all, from our Mighty Founder MAC.) http://www.netcabal.com/auk/cmsg.html 6. Who is a net.kook? If you post uniquely strange, preferably incomprehensible articles, or you manifest a persistent, extreme, and somewhat bizarre obsession, you just might be a net.kook. And more. It is important to note the subtle distinction between a net.kook, a net.cretin, a clueless newbie, troll, or garden-variety @$$hole. The newbie, one hopes, can acquire a clue on the installment plan even if he can't afford to buy one for cash; the cretin is merely stupid and/or irritating; the troll makes a fool out of himself by making a fool out of you, the @$$hole is, well, simply that. But a TRUE net.kook has a special fascination derived from his/her/its utter ineffability. Their behavior is irrational, if not downright weird, but they are seldom merely boring. It is not considered appropriate to nominate clueless newbies, trolls, or longwinded spambrains as net.kooks. It is acceptable to nominate net.cretins, or simply to present them, without nomination, for whatever minor amusement value they may have; but the real focus here is on net.kooks in all their raging, indomitable glory. Important Disclaimer: the fact that someone has been proclaimed a net.kook does not imply any psychological diagnosis in and of itself. A net.kook may or may not be clinically insane; that is not the concern of the AUK audience. We hope. 7. Can you show me a few examples? I'd rather not, but it may help to clarify things... The person who posted a handful of meaningless, ill-formed newgroup messages on May 21, 1994 was a Clueless Newbie. The person who hung around alt.religion.kibology during April and May 1994, constantly posting boilerplate "warning" messages telling people that ARK messages were intentionally meaningless, was a net.cretin. The people who post demented "scientific" theories, like Archimedes Plutonium's concept of the universe being one giant atom of plutonium, and seem incorrigible to criticism, are moderate net.kooks. The sort of being who constantly raves about the conspiracy against her/him/it is an extreme net.kook, especially if he/she/it automatically assumes that anyone who questions their world-view is an agent of the conspirators or is an ultra right-wing/left-wing extremist, and hides behind an anonymous remailer to avoid "persecution" even though they would get one hell of a lot less of it by not posting at all. 8. How do I present a Kook on this group? The preferred technique is to get the suspected Kook to start posting to AUK so that we can all see him/her/it in all their first-hand Glory. You can do this by posting followups to the suspect's weirder messages, with your followups nonchalantly crossposted to AUK. If the suspect responds to your messages without editing the Newsgroups line, you've achieved your goal. Another acceptable method is to repost, complete and unedited, one or two of the suspected Kook's recent rants. If you do this, please provide a brief intro in the header describing what the hell you're doing, such as indicating who this person is, what group you found the message on, or why you think the rest of us should give a rat's @$$ about it. You should be aware that if you try this with some perfectly reasonable posting, you may be flamed to net.hell and back and probably suspected of being a net.loon yourself. It is also considered extremely lame to nominate someone as a Kook simply because you have lost, or at least failed to win, a debate with them; persistently doing so is likely to get you nominated for Kook Awards. That someone fails to perceive the self-evident, unassailable wisdom of your viewpoint does not, in and of itself, constitute Kookery. 9. What are the Kook Awards? The newsgroup alt.usenet.kooks offers a variety of widely-recognized and highly dubious honors for your service, applying to net.kooks everywhere. They recognize several kinds and many levels of net.kookery. Here is a detailed list of AUK awards and descriptions. http://www.netcabal.com/auk/awards.html 10. Who the FSCK appointed YOU net.kookologist/god/nazi etc. Nobody. We have a Gift. ============================================== Incidentally, IIRC, the ones who started the x-poasting were not in fact kook-hunters from AUK, but the likes of you yourself and your buddy, "James", though ICBW. Not that it's important -- analysing kooks is what we(tinw) here at AlcaTroll Labs /do/, and whether a k00k chooses to post here on his own or is tricked into it, we don't really care. Either way, you hace been brought to our(tino) attention, and we won't ever forget about you for long. Ever. -- __________________________________________________ _______ Hail Eris! All hail Discordia!! Kallisti!!! mhm 29x21 Pope Snarky Goodfella of the undulating cable, JM, CK, POEE, KOTHASK, GGGHD, HCNB, IAC, MWFA Email popesnarky *at* gmail.com I want a boyfriend who is sensitive and caring, but they already have boyfriends. |
Moronic Outer Filth K00ks from rmcr sure suck fat ass. Ward F Hardman, Jr, Age: 59 (born 1946), Outing Filth snecked
On Sat, 19 Aug 2006 12:00:53 -0700, fha.jonkers wrote:
Lola Stonewall Riot schreef: Then, of course, consider that the x-poasting of the threads outing Ward Hardman /began/ in rmcr, and no one forced you guys to x-poast here. Now that you _are_ x-poasting to AUK, however, we(tinw) are highly inclined to return the favour for the next decade or so, perhaps longer, because it seems your group is a motherlode of k00ks, meaning we(tinw) are interested in it. You might have considered investigating before x-poasting here, honestly -- we(tinw) won't stop. Mind if I remind you of something? The "you guys" you are mentioning is no more than one troll with various accounts who has been spamming rmcr for a long time with his nonsense -- most people have him killfiled. What you are doing now, however, is "punishing" an entire (and relatively placid) group of 100+ subscribers for the actions of a troll that you seem to dislike as much as the whole rmcr group does. Doesn't that seem a little unfair? Isn't life a BITCH? Plus, the alleged multi-nym Google troll insists that he is, in fact, two different persons, and you sound like you might be another nym of the same k00k-torll, using better vocabulary. We(tinw) must investigate further, to see if the entire group is in favour of outing personal info, has "looked the other way" and given tacit passive support, or what. -- __________________________________________________ ________________________ Hail Eris! Not Richard Scoville Rookie Kook of the Year, 2005 Kook of the Month, December 2005 Clueless Newbie of the Month, October 2005 Palmjob Paddle, January 2006 George Pickett Memorial Trophy, October 2005 Coward of the Month, October 2005 George Armstrong Custer "Kicked @$$" Award Kenny McCormick Memorial Medal Order of the Holey Sockpuppet Balsa Gavel Richard M. Scoville is explicitly denied the right to archive any of my posts, under any of my nyms, on his site, FreeSpeechStore.com, winner of the Richbull.com Memorial Award for Kooksite of the Year, 2005 http://tinyurl.com/c222n "It's claiming authority based on absurd myths and fantasy beings - that creates anger." -- Kurt Gavin |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:50 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com