Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#33
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Brenda Ann" wrote in
: -- Say no to institutionalized interference. Just say NO to HD/IBOC! "John S." wrote in message oups.com... The point I was trying to make is that the amateur radio hobby matured about 3 decades ago. It's membership is aging rapidly and the number of active participants is declining. As the baby boomer generation dies off at an increasing rate the amateur radio hobby will continue to fade away. Fiddling with the test requirements isn't going to magically entice younger blood away from the many other license-free ways of communicating. I would venture to say that you could open the ham bands completely CB style and not get a big jump in membership. There are just too many other interesting, easy to use ways of communicating that that younger people are accustomed to using. I wish it were otherwise. Making the ham radio test more of a challenge as you suggest misses the point completely. The point is that there will be a diminishing number of people with any interest becoming a ham, no matter what the requirements are. Want to see interest in radio pique?? Open up a band specifically for unlicensed broadcasting. Not CB, not ham, but actual broadcasting. I can see tens of thousands rushing to get in on that one.. That because they're all appliance operators, they don't want to put forth an effort to learn and it will end up sounding like CB. SC |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
If you had to study to get a ham licence, would you stay on CB? | Policy | |||
To UAE/A6 : Dubai licence ? | Dx | |||
Official : no more morse in CEPT | General | |||
Official : no more morse in CEPT | General |