LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1   Report Post  
Old August 27th 06, 07:24 PM posted to rec.radio.amateur.misc,rec.radio.amateur.policy,rec.radio.cb
external usenet poster
 
First recorded activity by RadioBanter: Aug 2006
Posts: 407
Default You'll certainy never have to use CW to save a life.


"an old friend" wrote in message
ps.com...
Slow Code wrote:
"Cecil Moore" wrote in message
om...
The Kat wrote:
WHY in the **** are you continuing this thread in a SCANNER newsgroup??


Why in the @!#$% are you posting the identical objection
five times in an ANTENNA newsgroup??

Keep this crap out of rec.radio.amateur.policy!!!


enjoying your trolling SC at least this is on topic unlike most of your
crap
.........

And you will forever be unemployed White Trash, Mark.


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Policy 189 December 14th 06 10:46 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Antenna 58 September 17th 06 03:11 AM
You'll probably never have to use CW to save a life. Slow Code Scanner 54 September 17th 06 03:11 AM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? RLW General 3 August 26th 06 09:16 PM
If you had to use CW to save someone's life, would that person die? Slow Code Shortwave 42 August 23rd 06 02:28 PM


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 01:48 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2024 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017