Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#21
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Yep, keyclowns are that dumb!
Bob Dobbs EC42 wrote: On Sat, 30 Sep 2006 11:50:19 -0400, tnom wrote: So much for his 'revised' power rating..... "LOL"!!! It has changed once again. Apparently his amp isn't as stable as he claims. Looks like the squabble is between whether you want solid realistic performance with duplicable and sustainable levels, or the more impressive (to the technically naive) maximum deflection Dosy watts. Might be better to continue making the same amp but with two different housings, say, keep the current look of the Henry style, but issue more modest and accurate claims for its specifications, then put the same innards in a flashy chrome plated case with a buzzword name (turbo, dynamic, quantum etc) and state the extreme conjecture specifications that you seem to be arguing for now. From my experience with the sundry vagaries of the CB milieu, I'd guess there to be a market segment for each model. -- Echo Charlie 42 San Diego, California |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Brainteaser | Antenna | |||
Class C engineering question | Homebrew | |||
Current in loading coil, EZNEC - helix | Antenna | |||
Hallicrafters S-20R question | Shortwave | |||
Power vs Mode (The fundamentals) | CB |