How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC


Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

On 02 Oct 2006 01:56:14 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.


Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 02 Oct 2006 01:56:14 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.

Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

I have a Constitutional right to vote, and I exercise it every time. I
should prolly shut the **** up too but that ain't likely.

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

Steveo wrote:

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.
Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

I have a Constitutional right to vote, and I exercise it every time. I
should prolly shut the **** up too but that ain't likely.


================================================
In the United States, suffrage is determined by the individual states,
not federally. There is no national "right to vote". The states and the
people have changed the U.S. Constitution five times to disallow states
from limiting suffrage, thereby expanding it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage

===============================================




mike

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

m II wrote:
Steveo wrote:

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.
Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

I have a Constitutional right to vote, and I exercise it every time. I
should prolly shut the **** up too but that ain't likely.

================================================
In the United States, suffrage is determined by the individual states,
not federally. There is no national "right to vote". The states and the
people have changed the U.S. Constitution five times to disallow states
from limiting suffrage, thereby expanding it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage

===============================================

mike

blah blah blah..I've -never- been refused at the poll, have you?

(OT) : How Many Democrats Does It Take To Screw-Up And Election ?
 

Slow Code wrote:
None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

(OT) : How Many Democrats Does It Take To Screw-Up And Election ?

2000 - Only One "Al Gore" - I Inverted the Hanging Chad !

2004 - Only One "John 'ff' Kerry - I Invented the Flip-Flop !

yes i said that - just for the fun of it ~ RHF

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

Frank Gilliland wrote:


Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Interesting thought; it brings to mind what old Josef Stalin once said...

"He who casts the ballot controls nothing. He who -counts- the ballots
controls everything".

How many democrats does it take to screw in a light bulb?
 

Frank Gilliland wrote in
:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC


Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.


It's funny, the liberal democrat candidates commit fraud busing voters
around from polling place to polling place to try and get elected. The
tell them who to vote for at each polling place. The only thing they
don't do is to tell them how to properly cast a vote so it can be counted.
LOL! It must really suck to be stupid and a liberal.

SC

when you going to stop welching on your bet about my party sc you owe 100 hunderd to amsat in my name
 

Slow Code wrote:

when you going to stop welching on your bet about my party sc you owe
100 hunderd to amsat in my name

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

"Barnard Peters" wrote in message
news:pan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet...
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?
=
Heck. Maybe The Slickster and Janet could have used Halliburton to rebuild
the World Trade Center the first time it was bombed. Or, and get this...how
about if Halliburton would have rebuilt the USS Cole? Or the Marine barracks
in Lebanon?
I bet a little bit of that Halliburton money could have easily rebuilt the
Waco compound that Reno turned into a crematory...
But wait! Clinton was far too busy granting amnesty to home-grown terrorists
(get that Hillary vote) while spending monies given him from Communist
China.
And Clinton's gal, the Atty. General who advocated masturbation? Jocylen?
Didn't she go obscure right after her son was arrested for drug sales?

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.

And last, but most importantly. 95% of the wealthiest people in this country
pay 80% of the taxes gathered. The low earners, the ones you support, pay a
pittance compared to the rich. Your claim is pure Democrat poppycock.

(OT) : BP - Another Classic Example Of The Liberal "All-Petered-Out Principle"
 

Barnard Peters wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?

BP - You post is a Classic Example of the
Liberal "All-Petered-Out Principle". ~ RHF

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 03:59:06 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :


"Barnard Peters" wrote in message
news:pan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet.. .
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense, they
pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is hurt
financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?
=
Heck. Maybe The Slickster and Janet could have used Halliburton to rebuild
the World Trade Center the first time it was bombed. Or, and get this...how
about if Halliburton would have rebuilt the USS Cole? Or the Marine barracks
in Lebanon?
I bet a little bit of that Halliburton money could have easily rebuilt the
Waco compound that Reno turned into a crematory...
But wait! Clinton was far too busy granting amnesty to home-grown terrorists
(get that Hillary vote)


http://archive.salon.com/news/col/co...ons/index.html


while spending monies given him from Communist
China.


How do you think Bush is financing his war?


And Clinton's gal, the Atty. General who advocated masturbation? Jocylen?
Didn't she go obscure right after her son was arrested for drug sales?

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.


http://www.hereinreality.com/familyvalues.html


And last, but most importantly. 95% of the wealthiest people in this country
pay 80% of the taxes gathered. The low earners, the ones you support, pay a
pittance compared to the rich.


Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?


Your claim is pure Democrat poppycock.


Go blow a goat.

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:46:30 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :




Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?

The Homeless are not paying taxes. WE are paying for their medical care. We,
as in ME!


You think you are the only one? Get a clue. Supporting those who have
no means to support themselves is one of the costs of living in a
civilized society. If that concept evades your understanding, how
about a translation from the Big Dummy's Guide to Republican Values:
"We pay off the beggars so they don't become theives and steal our
****, or get restless and overthrow the politicians that we bought and
paid for with our hard-earned money."


And I dare you to show me a single instance of the IRS "shaking down" the
homeless. Name ONE instance and back it up with facts.
Show me where the IRS is attacking senior citizens.


Where did I say they did?


Seems to me it was Al
Gore who increased the taxes on Social Security...monies that our Senior
Citizens rely on to live from day to day.
It was Al Gore who placed a "fee" on everybody's phone bills and wouldn't
exempt the Seniors.


http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html


Blow a goat? How about if you tell the truth?


I just did.

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Yeah...like I'm going to waste my time following and reading your Leftista
links....

Guess agan...

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?

The Homeless are not paying taxes. WE are paying for their medical care. We,
as in ME!
And I dare you to show me a single instance of the IRS "shaking down" the
homeless. Name ONE instance and back it up with facts.
Show me where the IRS is attacking senior citizens. Seems to me it was Al
Gore who increased the taxes on Social Security...monies that our Senior
Citizens rely on to live from day to day.
It was Al Gore who placed a "fee" on everybody's phone bills and wouldn't
exempt the Seniors.

Blow a goat? How about if you tell the truth?

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 06:45:32 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :


"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
.. .
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:46:30 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :




Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?

The Homeless are not paying taxes. WE are paying for their medical care.
We,
as in ME!


You think you are the only one? Get a clue. Supporting those who have
no means to support themselves is one of the costs of living in a
civilized society. If that concept evades your understanding, how
about a translation from the Big Dummy's Guide to Republican Values:
"We pay off the beggars so they don't become theives and steal our
****, or get restless and overthrow the politicians that we bought and
paid for with our hard-earned money."


And I dare you to show me a single instance of the IRS "shaking down" the
homeless. Name ONE instance and back it up with facts.
Show me where the IRS is attacking senior citizens.


Where did I say they did?


Seems to me it was Al
Gore who increased the taxes on Social Security...monies that our Senior
Citizens rely on to live from day to day.
It was Al Gore who placed a "fee" on everybody's phone bills and wouldn't
exempt the Seniors.


http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html


Blow a goat? How about if you tell the truth?


I just did.

"Where did I say they did?"

Well, I copied and pasted your comment that, "by sending IRS agents out on
the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens"
I guess that constitutes you saying "they did".


A poor 'hack-and-attack' interpretation. Read the entire quote: "We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?"


I don't "need a clue" as that overused trite phrase of yours indicates.
That is what I like about Liberals. Catch phrases such as "get a clue" or,
"smell the coffee" are so easy to use.


Yes, and "poppycock" is so much more chic.


So..living in a "civilized society", according to you, requires that I
support the non-workers? The lazy? The druggies? Since when? According to
who? You?
What gives YOU the authority to tell me that I should support the lazy, the
unemployed?


I didn't invent civilization. If you want to abandon it, that's up to
you. Just remember that benefits don't come without responsibilities.


Maybe you should get a copy of The Dummies Guide of Mooching.
Liberals are all too quick to "feel sorry" for the lazy, the non-earners but
do little to help them. Oh, yeah..you want to give THEM my tax dollars...but
to what end?


I don't want to give them my tax dollars any more than you do. I would
much rather they earn their own livings and make contributions to
society like the rest of us. But not all of them are malingerers; many
of them have legitimate reasons for not being productive members of
society. The most common reasons are psychological and emotional
dysfunction, so I am very much in favor of providing mental health
treatment for anyone. That's how to attack the cause of a problem
(mental health) instead of throwing money at its effects (poverty).
Now how does that make me a liberal?


How about we turn that around in that, "We pay off the beggars so they don't
become theives and steal our ****", and we do it with more and more taxes
and handouts. Of course the beggars remain thieves, they count on the "dole"
and they will steal you and me blind, given the opportunity.

What have you solved???


I agree -- the Republican plan doesn't work.

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 4 Oct 2006 05:46:30 -0500, "Arf! Arf!"
wrote in :




Yeah, those taxes are really putting the pinch on the well-to-do. We
should relieve the burden on the rich by sending IRS agents out on the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens, huh?

The Homeless are not paying taxes. WE are paying for their medical care.
We,
as in ME!


You think you are the only one? Get a clue. Supporting those who have
no means to support themselves is one of the costs of living in a
civilized society. If that concept evades your understanding, how
about a translation from the Big Dummy's Guide to Republican Values:
"We pay off the beggars so they don't become theives and steal our
****, or get restless and overthrow the politicians that we bought and
paid for with our hard-earned money."


And I dare you to show me a single instance of the IRS "shaking down" the
homeless. Name ONE instance and back it up with facts.
Show me where the IRS is attacking senior citizens.


Where did I say they did?


Seems to me it was Al
Gore who increased the taxes on Social Security...monies that our Senior
Citizens rely on to live from day to day.
It was Al Gore who placed a "fee" on everybody's phone bills and wouldn't
exempt the Seniors.


http://www.ssa.gov/history/InternetMyths2.html


Blow a goat? How about if you tell the truth?


I just did.

"Where did I say they did?"

Well, I copied and pasted your comment that, "by sending IRS agents out on
the
streets to shake down the homeless and senior citizens"
I guess that constitutes you saying "they did".

I don't "need a clue" as that overused trite phrase of yours indicates.
That is what I like about Liberals. Catch phrases such as "get a clue" or,
"smell the coffee" are so easy to use.
So..living in a "civilized society", according to you, requires that I
support the non-workers? The lazy? The druggies? Since when? According to
who? You?
What gives YOU the authority to tell me that I should support the lazy, the
unemployed?

Maybe you should get a copy of The Dummies Guide of Mooching.
Liberals are all too quick to "feel sorry" for the lazy, the non-earners but
do little to help them. Oh, yeah..you want to give THEM my tax dollars...but
to what end?

How about we turn that around in that, "We pay off the beggars so they don't
become theives and steal our ****", and we do it with more and more taxes
and handouts. Of course the beggars remain thieves, they count on the "dole"
and they will steal you and me blind, given the opportunity.

What have you solved???

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Arf! Arf! wrote:

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.

Aren't you forgetting a well-known cokehead + alcoholic political leader
and his "dime-bag" wife...?

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Dick Chisel wrote:

Arf! Arf! wrote:

Oh, and not let us forget Roger Clinton, the half-brother druggie supreme
who snorted more Cocaine than a vacuum sweeper.

Aren't you forgetting a well-known cokehead + alcoholic political leader
and his "dime-bag" wife...?

Teddy Kennedy? Carter Grabarczyk, K8VT?

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Barnard Peters wrote in
news:pan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up dead US
solders to reach the light bulb made by GE. Due to this huge expense,
they pass more tax cuts for rich republicans so nobody (who counts) is
hurt financially. Everybody's a winner! Right?



Welcome to the rec.radio groups. You'll find a lot of screwed up liberals
and democrats here much like yourself. You'll probably feel most
comfortable discussing your k00k theories with the dumb-ass Canuks.

Welcome again.

73

de Slow Code

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

On Wed, 04 Oct 2006 03:59:06 -0500, Arf! Arf! wrote:


"Barnard Peters" wrote in message
news:pan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet... On Sun, 01 Oct 2006
22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

[quoted text muted]


As most wealthy people incorporate any income over ~$200k, those figures
make sense but I still find it had to believe that corporations,
millionaires and billionaires get away with sub-$100k tax bills. I guess
I'm not one of the wealthy people like you. Go figure...

I guess I'm one of the swing voters now but the reason I no longer respect
the republican party has been the worst of two evil philosophy. I have
come to realize that I would rather have a prez that gets blow-jobs from
19 or 20 year old girls than a prez that lies about being Christan while
behind the curtain, killing people to make other people rich and messing
with our freedoms to promote it. There has only been increases of
terrorism and WMD making all those arguments bogus.

Giving money to Communist china?!!! The corporations, in moving most
all their manufacturing to China in the last 8 years have overwhelmed
China with money and they don't know how to spend it fast enough! Makes
one wonder who is running the whitehouse?

It will be quite interesting to see if the Democrats get to spend $100M
to investigate Bush just like the republicans did to investigate
the Clintons. Perhaps those drunken little daughters escapades will come
back to light! LOL

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Barnard Peters wrote:


I guess I'm one of the swing voters now but the reason I no longer respect
the republican party has been the worst of two evil philosophy. I have
come to realize that I would rather have a prez that gets blow-jobs from
19 or 20 year old girls than a prez that lies about being Christan while
behind the curtain, killing people to make other people rich and messing
with our freedoms to promote it. There has only been increases of
terrorism and WMD making all those arguments bogus.

Very well said!

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

In article pan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet,
Barnard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up

Snip

Very offensive post.

Plonk

--
Telamon
Ventura, California

How many democrats / how many republicans
 

Telamon wrote:
In article pan.2006.10.04.05.40.06.32926@blueplanet,
Barnard Peters wrote:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 +0000, Slow Code wrote:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.
They accomplish this task by contracting Haliburtian to pile up

Snip

Very offensive post.


And you don't find the real life example it's based on offensive?

If you had more than two functioning brain cells, you would realize that
his post was an *allegory* for the bogus Iraq "war" and that the
Halliburton scandals and the piling up of dead bodies, theirs and ours,
is indeed offensive.