None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC


Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.

On 02 Oct 2006 01:56:14 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.


Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On 02 Oct 2006 01:56:14 GMT, Steveo wrote in
:

Frank Gilliland wrote:
On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.

Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

I have a Constitutional right to vote, and I exercise it every time. I
should prolly shut the **** up too but that ain't likely.

Steveo wrote:

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.
Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

I have a Constitutional right to vote, and I exercise it every time. I
should prolly shut the **** up too but that ain't likely.


================================================
In the United States, suffrage is determined by the individual states,
not federally. There is no national "right to vote". The states and the
people have changed the U.S. Constitution five times to disallow states
from limiting suffrage, thereby expanding it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage

===============================================




mike

m II wrote:
Steveo wrote:

Let er' rip. Those that don't vote should shut the **** up.
Anyone has the Constitutional right to say whatever they want. NOBODY
has the Constitutional right to vote. Kinda screwy, eh?

I have a Constitutional right to vote, and I exercise it every time. I
should prolly shut the **** up too but that ain't likely.

================================================
In the United States, suffrage is determined by the individual states,
not federally. There is no national "right to vote". The states and the
people have changed the U.S. Constitution five times to disallow states
from limiting suffrage, thereby expanding it.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Suffrage

===============================================

mike

blah blah blah..I've -never- been refused at the poll, have you?

Slow Code wrote:
None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC

(OT) : How Many Democrats Does It Take To Screw-Up And Election ?

2000 - Only One "Al Gore" - I Inverted the Hanging Chad !

2004 - Only One "John 'ff' Kerry - I Invented the Flip-Flop !

yes i said that - just for the fun of it ~ RHF

Frank Gilliland wrote:


Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.

Interesting thought; it brings to mind what old Josef Stalin once said...

"He who casts the ballot controls nothing. He who -counts- the ballots
controls everything".

Frank Gilliland wrote in
:

On Sun, 01 Oct 2006 22:38:32 GMT, Slow Code wrote in
et:

None,

They complain about it being dark and wait for a republican to do it.

SC


Q: How many people will decide the outcome of the coming elections?

A: One -- the judge who decided that the source code for the election
machines can remain secret.


It's funny, the liberal democrat candidates commit fraud busing voters
around from polling place to polling place to try and get elected. The
tell them who to vote for at each polling place. The only thing they
don't do is to tell them how to properly cast a vote so it can be counted.
LOL! It must really suck to be stupid and a liberal.

SC