On 26 Dec 2006 02:50:21 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote in
. com:


Frank Gilliland wrote:
Right. Let's start with your earlier design, a 2-pill, push-pull
"linear" hacked from a Communications Concepts kit, which itself is a
hack from a Motorola datasheet; then when under pressure for a decent
bias circuit you hack a design from a ham's webpage on and refuse to
disclose the schematic. You start -this- thread by openly admitting
how you are hacking a "compressor" circuit from another ham. Yet you
maintain that none of your designs are hacked. I'm now convinced that
you have redefined the term "hacked" to suit your purposes, just like
you did with the word "linear", and will likely do with "compression".
Congratulations, you just graduated from the Presidential Academy of
Semantics.

Frank, you evidently think that once an IC or transistor is used in a
design... that if someone else uses that same transistor or IC... that
the new design has hacked the existing one.


Hey Kreskin, in your case it does because you don't have enough
understanding of the theory to design and assemble anything from
scratch.


No wonder you never designed anything... LOL


You claim to be an engineer. So what happens when you design something
for your employer? Who owns the design?