Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello TS E:
You need a really Bitchen type of name for a good speech processor. But the problem is, that if the speech processor doesn't work well then the Bitchen name works against you. I have a "KING KONG" Gamma Match here with a very large burn hole in it. "KING KONG" yeah right! They put more time into the name than the product! Jay in the Mojave Telstar Electronics wrote: Please give me your ideas for a name for this developing product... www.telstar-electronics.com |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay in the Mojave wrote:
Hello TS E: You need a really Bitchen type of name for a good speech processor. But the problem is, that if the speech processor doesn't work well then the Bitchen name works against you. I have a "KING KONG" Gamma Match here with a very large burn hole in it. "KING KONG" yeah right! They put more time into the name than the product! Jay... maybe they meant King Kong size burn hole... LOL www.telstar-electronics.com |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay in the Mojave" wrote in message ... Hello TS E: You need a really Bitchen type of name for a good speech processor. But the problem is, that if the speech processor doesn't work well then the Bitchen name works against you. I have a "KING KONG" Gamma Match here with a very large burn hole in it. "KING KONG" yeah right! They put more time into the name than the product! Jay in the Mojave Telstar Electronics wrote: Please give me your ideas for a name for this developing product... www.telstar-electronics.com Hi Jay, didnt know you could buy gamma matches. A guy gave me a Moonraker 4 beam a few years ago that had some damage . The gamma mctches had been damaged so I replaced them with a piece of Al tubing and a piece of RGa that had the shield stripped off. |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Jimmie D" wrote:
"Jay in the Mojave" wrote in message ... Hello TS E: You need a really Bitchen type of name for a good speech processor. But the problem is, that if the speech processor doesn't work well then the Bitchen name works against you. I have a "KING KONG" Gamma Match here with a very large burn hole in it. "KING KONG" yeah right! They put more time into the name than the product! Jay in the Mojave Telstar Electronics wrote: Please give me your ideas for a name for this developing product... www.telstar-electronics.com Hi Jay, didnt know you could buy gamma matches. A guy gave me a Moonraker 4 beam a few years ago that had some damage . The gamma mctches had been damaged so I replaced them with a piece of Al tubing and a piece of RGa that had the shield stripped off. Good job, Jim. Gizmotchy sells 5K gammas. Can't swear to their reliability but they've been around since the 60's. http://www.gizmotchy.com/Repairparts.html |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Jimmie D:
Yeah there are after market and some antenna manufactures sell larger diameter Gamma Matches to handle higher voltage in order to handle high power output. The costly thing in the Gamma Matches is the use of a good insulator like Teflon is real expensive. I just put up a Moonraker 4 with some new and improved parts and pieces, but still had the stock Gamma Matches. The Hubs, Mast to Boom mounting plate, and and few other things had been updated, but I was disappointed with the antennas performance. And I ran one of these antennas for a long time. Jay in the Mojave Jimmie D wrote: Hi Jay, didnt know you could buy gamma matches. A guy gave me a Moonraker 4 beam a few years ago that had some damage . The gamma mctches had been damaged so I replaced them with a piece of Al tubing and a piece of RGa that had the shield stripped off. |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Jay in the Mojave" wrote in message ... Hello Jimmie D: Yeah there are after market and some antenna manufactures sell larger diameter Gamma Matches to handle higher voltage in order to handle high power output. The costly thing in the Gamma Matches is the use of a good insulator like Teflon is real expensive. I just put up a Moonraker 4 with some new and improved parts and pieces, but still had the stock Gamma Matches. The Hubs, Mast to Boom mounting plate, and and few other things had been updated, but I was disappointed with the antennas performance. And I ran one of these antennas for a long time. Jay in the Mojave Jimmie D wrote: Hi Jay, didnt know you could buy gamma matches. A guy gave me a Moonraker 4 beam a few years ago that had some damage . The gamma mctches had been damaged so I replaced them with a piece of Al tubing and a piece of RGa that had the shield stripped off. The moonraker is a pretty decent antenna but like a lot of CB antennas the manufctures were trying to sell elements. They stuff as many elements as they can on a boom that is still UPS shipable. I remember back in the 70s how a few people would claim that ther e3 element beam was better than the 4 they used to have and now I believe they may have been right. I extended the boom on mine and respaced the elements vertical for 11M and horizontal for 10. Any way I guess the point I was trying to make to start with before I rambled is that my Al tubing and coax gamma match easily handles a full KW on 10. Why cant the manufacturers make something that is so easy to make? At the risk of appearing to answer my own question I think it was because if they did consumers would realize you can go down to the hardware store and buy the parts and roll your own about as easy as you can build thiers out of the box. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hello Jimmie D:
Well the Moonraker 4 and 6 element beams where a great design for the hardware to get real cheap for production. The Hubs that attached the Elements to the Boom are made from Cast Aluminum. Real cheap to manufacture, but in time they break and crack making the Moonraker Beams useless. I had new Hubs made from 6061 T6 Billet Aluminum made from a CNC Mill. Now the Hubs are bullet proof. But expensive! But the problem for manufacturing something using large quantities of materials is always been a design art. Jay in the Mojave Jimmie D wrote: The moonraker is a pretty decent antenna but like a lot of CB antennas the manufctures were trying to sell elements. They stuff as many elements as they can on a boom that is still UPS shipable. I remember back in the 70s how a few people would claim that ther e3 element beam was better than the 4 they used to have and now I believe they may have been right. I extended the boom on mine and respaced the elements vertical for 11M and horizontal for 10. Any way I guess the point I was trying to make to start with before I rambled is that my Al tubing and coax gamma match easily handles a full KW on 10. Why cant the manufacturers make something that is so easy to make? At the risk of appearing to answer my own question I think it was because if they did consumers would realize you can go down to the hardware store and buy the parts and roll your own about as easy as you can build thiers out of the box. |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Jay in the Mojave wrote:
Hello TS E: You need a really Bitchen type of name for a good speech processor. But the problem is, that if the speech processor doesn't work well then the Bitchen name works against you. I have a "KING KONG" Gamma Match here with a very large burn hole in it. "KING KONG" yeah right! They put more time into the name than the product! Hello Jay Was that KING KONG a MONKEY MADE??? Have a great weekend. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 Jan 2007 05:40:39 -0800, "Telstar Electronics"
wrote: Please give me your ideas for a name for this developing product... www.telstar-electronics.com You asked for it: Speech Plagiacessor |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Speech Processor Product - Your Input is Requested | CB | |||
Free speech | Antenna | |||
Here's Your Answer, Todd.... | Policy | |||
AMATEUR'S USE AMATEUR AUXILIARY TO SUPPRESS FREE SPEECH | Policy | |||
Heil Clear Speech | Shortwave |