Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 12:43:12 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: +++On Mon, 19 Feb 2007 19:12:33 GMT, james wrote +++in : +++ +++On Sun, 18 Feb 2007 18:24:33 -0800, Frank Gilliland wrote: +++ ++++++Conjugate match is needed for maximum power transfer. ++++++ ++++++ ++++++IMPEDANCE match... for maximum power transfer. A 'conjugate' match is ++++++when the impedances are complex, which isn't always the case. +++*********** +++ +++I have found that it is rare in the real world that impeadances are +++not complex. Outside transimission lines, there is little that is not +++complex. +++ +++ +++You just said that resistors have complex impedance and transmission +++lines are flat. +++ ************ No I did not. Besides Resistors can have complex impedances depending upon constrtuctinand frequency in which they are used. +++ +++ Then again when you conjugate match, the imaginary part of +++the complex impedances is nulified and you are then left with the real +++part. +++ +++ +++Reactances don't just disappear. They create a current between the +++source and load that must be assessed to see if it is going to cause +++any problems. Sometimes it doesn't and sometimes it does. +++ +++ *********** I did not say they disappeared. At resonance the conjugate match causes the net reactance to be zero. Thus nulify. The reactance are always there. james |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
A long post on audio for SWL. | Shortwave | |||
Sony 2010 loses memory, resets itself | Shortwave | |||
Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Dx | |||
stuff for all hams | General | |||
FS: Cobra 2010 Base CB | CB |