| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 14:38:38 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote: +++On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:03:02 GMT, james wrote +++in : +++ +++On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:46:57 -0800, Frank Gilliland wrote: +++ ++++++But you are still ignoring the fact that a conjugate match is nothing ++++++more than an impedance match using a conjugate impedance, which is ++++++often not necessary. +++********** +++ +++True +++ +++Sometimes it is the easiest and cheapest method though +++ +++ +++I tend to disagree with that, too, but I'll drop it because it could +++revive the great coax length debate..... AARGGHHH!!! +++ ************ I use conjugate matches with active devices and crystal filters. In that aspect they are easier and cheaper. james |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| A long post on audio for SWL. | Shortwave | |||
| Sony 2010 loses memory, resets itself | Shortwave | |||
| Amateur Radio Newslin(tm) Report 1385 – February 27, 2004 | Dx | |||
| stuff for all hams | General | |||
| FS: Cobra 2010 Base CB | CB | |||