"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007 20:03:02 GMT, james wrote
in :

On Tue, 20 Feb 2007 21:46:57 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

+++But you are still ignoring the fact that a conjugate match is nothing
+++more than an impedance match using a conjugate impedance, which is
+++often not necessary.
**********

True

Sometimes it is the easiest and cheapest method though


I tend to disagree with that, too, but I'll drop it because it could
revive the great coax length debate..... AARGGHHH!!!




Everyone knows you have to use multiples of 9 square feet! Doh!



Posted Via Usenet.com Premium Usenet Newsgroup Services
----------------------------------------------------------
** SPEED ** RETENTION ** COMPLETION ** ANONYMITY **
----------------------------------------------------------
http://www.usenet.com