On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:55:26 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

|On Aug 26, 7:50 pm, james wrote:
| It maybe possible to get to 100% average modulation without
| overmodulation. Still such a signal is really unitelligable and not
| worth the effort to achieve it. A voice so compressed that the peakto
| average amplitudes are equal will more than likely yield a totally
| unitelligable signal.
|
|Absolute nonsense. Why do you think that sustaining 100% modulation
|will render the signal unintelligible? The modulation percentage has
|to do with the level of modulation applied to the transmitter. As long
|as you stay below overmodulation (100%) then if the modulation signal
|has not been clipped... or waveshape altered in any way except size...
|then your modulation will be perfect... and it will contain all the
|intelligence it had originally. Not only can it be done... people who
|have VoiceMax do it every day.
|www.telstar-electronics.com
|
|---------------------

Brian

Here is the jeopardy question for you:

In the category of electronics for $100

Name the only signal that has the same value for its peak and average
value?

Now if you can answer that correctly, then you will understand why a
modulating signal that yields both 100% modulation on its peak and its
average is unitelligable.

If you answer that then we might go onto electronics for $200.


james

On Aug 28, 7:21 pm, james wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:55:26 -0700, Telstar Electronics

wrote:

|On Aug 26, 7:50 pm, james wrote:
| It maybe possible to get to 100% average modulation without
| overmodulation. Still such a signal is really unitelligable and not
| worth the effort to achieve it. A voice so compressed that the peakto
| average amplitudes are equal will more than likely yield a totally
| unitelligable signal.
|
|Absolute nonsense. Why do you think that sustaining 100% modulation
|will render the signal unintelligible? The modulation percentage has
|to do with the level of modulation applied to the transmitter. As long
|as you stay below overmodulation (100%) then if the modulation signal
|has not been clipped... or waveshape altered in any way except size...
|then your modulation will be perfect... and it will contain all the
|intelligence it had originally. Not only can it be done... people who
|have VoiceMax do it every day.
|www.telstar-electronics.com
|
|---------------------

Brian

Here is the jeopardy question for you:

In the category of electronics for $100

Name the only signal that has the same value for its peak and average
value?

Now if you can answer that correctly, then you will understand why a
modulating signal that yields both 100% modulation on its peak and its
average is unitelligable.

If you answer that then we might go onto electronics for $200.

james

You're gonna make him sprain his brain with that one.

james wrote:

Brian

Here is the jeopardy question for you:

In the category of electronics for $100

Name the only signal that has the same value for its peak and average
value?

Now if you can answer that correctly, then you will understand why a
modulating signal that yields both 100% modulation on its peak and its
average is unitelligable.

If you answer that then we might go onto electronics for $200.


james

I believe the answer is: CW.

"james" wrote in message...

Brian

Here is the jeopardy question for you:

In the category of electronics for $100

Name the only signal that has the same value for its peak
and average value?

If he doesn't, does the question get thrown open to the
opposing team for a bonus point?
Oh, wait a minute... you are the opposing team :~)

Now if you can answer that correctly, then you will understand
why a modulating signal that yields both 100% modulation on
its peak and its average is unitelligable.

Even if he gets it, do you think that it's in his favor to accept
the facts? His only product would become pointless, and any
money and time invested will be lost.


If you answer that then we might go onto electronics for $200.

The problem is that this subject involves more than
electronics. Human speech, hearing and interpretation
is much more than simple decibel level.

Do you really have the spare time to explain everything
to him? If so, do you really want to be faced with legal
action when his brain implodes?


Regards,
Peter.

On Sun, 2 Sep 2007 05:25:43 +0100, " Peter"
wrote:

|Do you really have the spare time to explain everything
|to him? If so, do you really want to be faced with legal
|action when his brain implodes?
|----------

Not really.

james