On Aug 28, 7:21 pm, james wrote:
On Mon, 27 Aug 2007 02:55:26 -0700, Telstar Electronics

wrote:

|On Aug 26, 7:50 pm, james wrote:
| It maybe possible to get to 100% average modulation without
| overmodulation. Still such a signal is really unitelligable and not
| worth the effort to achieve it. A voice so compressed that the peakto
| average amplitudes are equal will more than likely yield a totally
| unitelligable signal.
|
|Absolute nonsense. Why do you think that sustaining 100% modulation
|will render the signal unintelligible? The modulation percentage has
|to do with the level of modulation applied to the transmitter. As long
|as you stay below overmodulation (100%) then if the modulation signal
|has not been clipped... or waveshape altered in any way except size...
|then your modulation will be perfect... and it will contain all the
|intelligence it had originally. Not only can it be done... people who
|have VoiceMax do it every day.
|www.telstar-electronics.com
|
|---------------------

Brian

Here is the jeopardy question for you:

In the category of electronics for $100

Name the only signal that has the same value for its peak and average
value?

Now if you can answer that correctly, then you will understand why a
modulating signal that yields both 100% modulation on its peak and its
average is unitelligable.

If you answer that then we might go onto electronics for $200.

james

You're gonna make him sprain his brain with that one.