On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:18:02 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

On Aug 26, 4:27 am, 777 wrote:
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

Thanks for the history lesson... lol
Now, do you have anything to add to the real conversation here?

YES!!!
Please stop the spamming of the group...
I doubt you will respond to that with your boring banter...
Stop Spamming Brian Griffey.....

On Aug 31, 7:40 am, 777 wrote:
YES!!!
Please stop the spamming of the group...
I doubt you will respond to that with your boring banter...
Stop Spamming Brian Griffey.....

Thanks for your comment.
Don't miss the introductory offer on VoiceMax at
http://www.telstar-electronics.com/d...evelopment.htm

777 wrote:
On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:18:02 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

On Aug 26, 4:27 am, 777 wrote:
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

Thanks for the history lesson... lol
Now, do you have anything to add to the real conversation here?

YES!!!
Please stop the spamming of the group...
I doubt you will respond to that with your boring banter...

He will respond again with his google spam sig, and so it goes. Plonk the
spamtard.


Stop Spamming Brian Griffey.....


Doubt it, unless he finds a real job.

On Aug 31, 4:02 pm, Steveo wrote:
Doubt it, unless he finds a real job.

Yes... I should get a real job like Steveo... manure salesman... lol

Why Do You Need a Speech Processor for Your CB Radio?
Two-way radio communication relies on the modulation contained within
the signal. Maintaining a high modulation level is crucial in
providing the highest possible efficiency from any transmitter
operating on AM, FM, or SSB modes. Two-way radios also rely on
microphones that inherently change audio levels delivered to the
transmitter. This causes transmitter modulation to fluctuate greatly
depending on voice level and pitch. The average modulation of a
typical voice signal is only about 40%. This low percentage applied to
the transmitter, results in less than optimal transmission range.

Other Processors Have a Problem...
Other speech processors use a low-cost "audio clipping" approach to
achieve compression. While this method is economical for the
manufacturer, clipping distorts the original signal and sounds fuzzy
on the air. What these types of audio processors gain in volume, they
lose in voice intelligibility.

VoiceMax is Different...
VoiceMax uses a sophisticated AGC (Automatic Gain Control) circuit
that installs inside your transceiver to hold the audio level
constant, with less than 1% harmonic distortion. No "clipping" type
processor can come close to this low distortion level. Whether you're
whispering or shouting, VoiceMax holds your transceiver at 100%
modulation allowing you to punch through heavy channel traffic without
sacrificing voice clarity. VoiceMax incorporates a feature not offered
on other processors. The adjustable noise gate allows the user to
block unwanted ambient background sounds. This feature is especially
helpful in mobile environments where wind and road noise can be an
issue. VoiceMax works with your non-amplified dynamic microphone to
give you tremendous audio punch without all the background noise
associated with power microphones.

www.telstar-electronics.com

"Yo Mamma" wrote:
"Telstar Electronics" wrote in message
oups.com...
On Aug 31, 4:02 pm, Steveo wrote:
Doubt it, unless he finds a real job.

Yes... I should get a real job like Steveo... manure salesman... lol



All bull**** aside Brian, post your 1040EZ here online and let Mopar do
the same. I suspect you won't because you probably are eligible for
earned income credit, much like N8WWM.

His mom still claims him as a dependent.

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:40:28 GMT, 777 wrote:

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:18:02 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

On Aug 26, 4:27 am, 777 wrote:
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

Thanks for the history lesson... lol
Now, do you have anything to add to the real conversation here?

YES!!!
Please stop the spamming of the group...
I doubt you will respond to that with your boring banter...
Stop Spamming Brian Griffey.....

I concur

On Fri, 28 Sep 2007 11:29:09 GMT, Old Knick wrote:

On Fri, 31 Aug 2007 12:40:28 GMT, 777 wrote:

On Sun, 26 Aug 2007 15:18:02 -0700, Telstar Electronics
wrote:

On Aug 26, 4:27 am, 777 wrote:
Griff has been spamming for quite some time... Yes indeed the old
timer said that ... You know griff from back in the painkiller days

Thanks for the history lesson... lol
Now, do you have anything to add to the real conversation here?

YES!!!
Please stop the spamming of the group...
I doubt you will respond to that with your boring banter...
Stop Spamming Brian Griffey.....

I concur

Is grif still here?