that e letter is dated 2003 could we bitch about something a little
more current

The one you quoted was old, but it was put there for the new readers
who may not have heard about that. The first post was new.

Hey, are you this guy?
http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-279969A1.html

On Feb 9, 1:38*pm, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:
that e letter is dated 2003 could we bitch about something a little
more current

The one you quoted was old, but it was put there for the new readers
who may not have heard about that. The first post was new.

Hey, are you this guy?http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...279969A1..html

no why do you sugest I am

an_old_friend wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:38 pm, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:
that e letter is dated 2003 could we bitch about something a little
more current
The one you quoted was old, but it was put there for the new readers
who may not have heard about that. The first post was new.

Hey, are you this guy?http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-279969A1.html

no why do you sugest I am


Are you the AH signing your mail "?
If so, you might be!

On Feb 9, 2:33*pm, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:
an_old_friend wrote:
On Feb 9, 1:38 pm, Scott in Baltimore
wrote:
that e letter is dated 2003 could we bitch about something a little
more current
The one you quoted was old, but it was put there for the new readers
who may not have heard about that. The first post was new.

Hey, are you this guy?http://www.fcc.gov/eb/FieldNotices/2...-279969A1.html

no why do you sugest I am

Are you the AH signing your mail "?
If so, you might be!

how do you drive that libelous statement

i am KB9RQZ holder of valid ham license and my name in no way
resembles the fellow you are referring to he live almost as far from
me as you he could and remain in the same state