On Nov 1, 8:36*am, jim wrote:
Landshark wrote:
"jim" wrote in message
...

Landshark wrote:

"jim" wrote in message
...

Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?

*What's up OG???? LOL!!!!! Well you are right, but a good
filter doesn't hurt. It saw 89 post BBAAAAMMMMM, only
8 after filters. Going to see this collection tomorrow, wish you
& Steveo were closer, I know you two would like it.

http://www.milvehtechfound.com/history.html

Here's a good link with pictures:

http://www.mishalov.net/military-veh...-vehicles.html

* Landshark

Nice site Sharkie. Thanks. I'm more particular to the air side of defense
as the family has been building planes since the '30's. Last plane was the
F14D Super Tomcat. Its retired now so I've moved on to state of the art
telecomm's.

*No problem, love military air, just more towards WWII, not the modern, push
button stuff. That collection was awesome, it was amazing the stuff that guy
has.
* I'll let you know when I'm out your way, visiting the Smithsonian. We'll
make a day or two for the Air & Space museum.

* * Landshark

I belong to the A&S org. *Great museum there.- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

A&S...heheh...anal and sucking...I get it!

Batch Search Summary
SEARCH ID SEARCH CRITERIA IDENTIFIER STATUS
3930206 Chapman,Randall CCH/NBF/SOR [9 results.] VIEW DETAILS


RESULTS FOR 'CHAPMAN,RANDALL '
Search ID 3930206 Back to Top
NAME DPS NUMBER SEX RACE DATE OF BIRTH CCH SOR NBF
CHAPMAN,RANDOLPH WILLARD 05388013 MALE WHITE 03/22/1961 VIEW


CHAPMAN,RANDOLPH WILLARD (SID: 05388013)
SEX RACE ETHNICITY HEIGHT WEIGHT EYES HAIR COLOR DL NUMBER FBI# DLU
MALE WHITE 508 195 BROWN Brown 10/26/1995
NAMES CHAPMAN,RANDOLPH WILLARD (Primary)
CHAPMAN,RANDY

BIRTHDATES 03/22/1961 (Primary)


Arrest Summary (TRN)
DATE OF ARREST SEQUENCE CODE TRACKING NUMBER AGENCY DESCRIPTION
01/16/1995 A 0007369727 TEXAS CITY PD View


Arrest Date: 01/16/1995 Arrest Summary


DATE OF ARREST 01/16/1995
SEQUENCE CODE A
TRACKING NUMBER 0007369727
AGENCY DESCRIPTION TX0840900 ( TEXAS CITY PD )
CHARGE
TRACKING SUFFIX A001
OFFENSE DETAIL
INTERNAL AGENCY PERSON NUMBER 020130
INTERNAL AGENCY CASE NUMBER 95633
ARREST OFFENSE 35990014 ( POSS CS PG 1 1G )
ARREST OFFENSE CITATION 481.115(b)
LEVEL AND DEGREE OF OFFENSE FS ( FELONY - STATE JAIL FELONY )
DATE OF OFFENSE 01/16/1995
ARREST DISPOSITION 205 ( HELD )
ARREST DISPOSITION DATE 01/16/1995
PROSECUTOR ORI REFERRED TO TX084015A ( DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
GALVESTON )
PROSECUTION DETAIL
AGENCY DESCRIPTION TX084015A ( DISTRICT ATTORNEYS OFFICE
GALVESTON )
PROSECUTOR ACTION FIELD A ( PROSECUTOR ACCEPTS THE CHARGE )
PROSECUTOR OFFENSE 35990014 ( POSS CS PG 1 1G )
PROSECUTOR OFFENSE CITATION 481.115(b)
LEVEL AND DEGREE PROSECUTED FS ( FELONY - STATE JAIL FELONY )
COURT STATUS
COURT SEQUENCE a
AGENCY DESCRIPTION TX084035J ( 122ND DISTRICT COURT GALVESTON )
COURT OFFENSE 35990014 ( POSS CS PG 1 1G )
CITATION 481.115(b)
LEVEL AND DEGREE OFFENSE FS ( FELONY - STATE JAIL FELONY )
COURT DISPOSITION 312 ( DEFERRED )
COURT DISPOSITION DATE 09/21/1995
DATE OF SENTENCE/STATUS 09/21/1995
CAUSE NUMBER 95CR0800
FINAL PLEADING G ( GUILTY )
COURT PROBATION 4Y
COURT FINE 200
COURT COSTS 157
AGENCY RECEIVING CUSTODY GCCSCD

jim wrote:
Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?



Any conditions on 10/11 meters?

Any conditions on 10/11 meters?

I heard nothing but locals on 10/11.
20 and 40 were another story!

Even a general ticket will get you most of HF...but some folks like it in one place only.
Ain't nothing wrong with that...

I can't block the assholes because they keep changing stuff in their addys.
I wish they would stop it already. I don't want to hear their bullsh!t.
I find myself peeking in and marking the NG as read.

Hello Scott in Baltimo

I have keep an eye on the conditions as well, and Iam not hearing
anything except some scattered skip out the Central and South America
areas.

The experts are also befuttled asking were is the skip in sun spot cycle
24 is. I have called then a few times but eventually get hung up on!
They must not shot skip, or want to get their knee's in the brezze?
http://www.solarcycle24.com/

As I tune across the bands I am hearing a noisy power line down our dirt
road, and the boys won't fix it. So I will have to fix it.

20, 40, and 80 have and some local traffic but not much. I was tuning in
on 12 meters and thought I heard a FM station out there.... more listening

Keep the goof balls out of the news group is a easy as turning your beam
to get rid the goof balls on the radio, and even takes less times. I
just filter them out, takes about 15 seconds. And ya get good knowing
who they are so even becomes esiser.



Scott in Baltimore wrote:
Any conditions on 10/11 meters?

I heard nothing but locals on 10/11.
20 and 40 were another story!

Even a general ticket will get you most of HF...but some folks like it
in one place only.
Ain't nothing wrong with that...

I can't block the assholes because they keep changing stuff in their addys.
I wish they would stop it already. I don't want to hear their bullsh!t.
I find myself peeking in and marking the NG as read.

Was your nose itching yesterday? I was thinking that I hadn't heard from you in a while!

How about somewhere in the extra portion of 20 meters?


20, 40, and 80 have and some local traffic but not much. I was tuning in
on 12 meters and thought I heard a FM station out there.... more listening

"jim" wrote in message
...
Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to try
and turn the tide?


Jim, this place is a sewer because of Steve. He's a pure lowlife
impersonator who has chased the regs out of many groups and now he's getting
what he deserves. No actually, if and when he dies a horrible death, then
he will get what he deserves.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:59:44 -0400, jim
wrote:

Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?

It's hard jim with all this bull**** but I wrote a post about it about
a month ago.

Syfo-Dyas wrote:
On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:59:44 -0400, jim
wrote:


Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?


It's hard jim with all this bull**** but I wrote a post about it about
a month ago.

Hell you could of written a post 3 years ago and it would still suffice.

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:59:44 -0400, jim
wrote:

Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?

Hey old buddie I still think 18 feet of coax on a mobile setup is
better than 12 foot for resonance and swr. Hahahahhaa LOL!!! Let the
arguments begin....

Syfo-Dyas wrote:

On Fri, 17 Oct 2008 20:59:44 -0400, jim
wrote:


Between the crap about adair and mork it's amazing people still frequent
this ng. The days of people arguing about feed line length versus swr
seems like a distant memory. Are there any old timers here who want to
try and turn the tide?


Hey old buddie I still think 18 feet of coax on a mobile setup is
better than 12 foot for resonance and swr. Hahahahhaa LOL!!! Let the
arguments begin....


hehe just figured out who you were. Feed length 'does' make a difference
when calculating swr