Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#12
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(Homac) wrote in message . com...
I agree.... Most FRS units I have seen are restricted to 500mW or 1/2 a watt. All are. Good for a picnic or at the ski hill. They are actually fairly worthless at a large ski resort. If you are on the same run, they might work out, but UHF (FRS) doesn't work well thru trees. If you are a radio enthusiast and want to speak to people around town or further, better stick to CB or amateur boxes.... CB is OK for mobile/base usage, but they are absolutely huge and totally inefficient in handheld applications... they might work better than an FRS radio on the ski slope, but they are completely ungainly. For the skiing application, a "real" GMRS, or MURS radio would be preferable to FRS for performance reasons or CB for size reasons, and a modern miniature 2m ham handheld would be the ideal solution for both size and performance reasons. - Stewart http://groups.yahoo.com/group/MURS-OPEN |
#13
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
For the skiing application, a "real" GMRS, or MURS radio would be
preferable to FRS for performance reasons or CB for size reasons, A real GMRS radio on the same frequency range will not do much better then an FRS radio. Height, antenna and power makes more of a difference in decreasing amounts in that order. |
Reply |
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Sneaking tiny radios into North Korea | Broadcasting | |||
Comparison of six portable radios | Broadcasting | |||
export cb radios | Policy | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIO'S | Equipment | |||
FS MOTOROLA RADIOS HT1000'S , VISAR'S ,& MAXTRAC'S | Equipment |