Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , "RASTA"
wrote: "Frank Gilliland" wrote in message .. . Because through this newsgroup an anti-illegal position can be promoted which can directly influence the band. The concept is universal and it works; whether you call it social reinforcement, peer-pressure, or simply setting a good example, it's one way that responsible CBers can improve the situation. Understood. But through constant "bickering"? By all means, I can see and respect that you and your fellow compadres are actively taking part in trying to "take up arms" (per say) in reminding others about the legalities of radio. But through this newsgroup, people wants information about RADIO! Not Part 97 of the FCC Regulations. If "they" want to commit " radio piracy", then that's "their" choice. Of course, your choice is to prevent that... but that is your choice too. But constant arguments is not going to influence anything but chase the newcomer away... and this newsgroup will not fulfill its intended purpose. CB radio information. Is that why you are arguing with me now? Was the purpose of your original post in this thread to discuss "CB radio information"? Practice what you preach. Nobody said it does, a point you seemed to have missed for the past several years. What it DOES constitute is the -encouragement- for people to break those laws by making the act much easier to accomplish. There are at least two different ways this 'information' makes lawbreaking easier: Franklin... whether this makes any sense, the internet's expanse is too infinte to try to stop anyone(s) hunger for information. Whether they get their information from here or not, there is too many websites that information can be attained from. You or your counterparts cannot stop that. Even if you try to throw in a little bit of the regulations in a thread, info seekers will just move on and find other forums to get the info needed. Of course this information can't be supressed. But it -can- be evaluated for it's technical validity. For example, "swang" is a new word for an old concept: DSBRC (Double-SideBand Reduced Carrier), a mode given up over half a century ago because it causes more problems than it solves. So when a CB newbie listens to some dummy talking about 'bird-watts', don't you think he would like to know the truth of the matter? Of course he would, and that's all I'm doing. It's the "golden-screwdriver" techs that spread this 'information', and instead of supressing it, I just tell what the 'information' really means so the CBer can make an informed decision as to whether or not to trash his radio. First, and most obvious, is that the information eliminates the need for the prospective lawbreakers to learn the technology, allowing them to take a criminal approach -- the 'quick and easy path' -- to accomplish their goals. I sincerely believe that if such information wasn't freely available, many more of these people would either educate themselves enough to turn their interest in radio into a legitimate hobby (or even a profession), or find it too difficult and abandon radio piracy in favor of more rewarding and responsible goals. This may sound bad, but CB radio will not influence anyone to accomplish any goals. It is a hobby. It is not a lifestyle. One thing is for certain... society as a whole doesn't need anyone from Louisiana, Washington State, Ohio, New York or Philadelphia to tell it what it can do and what it can't. Society is self-educated. It's the way it is. And trying to "STOP" that "freely available" information is like "...trying to pour the ocean into a hole dug into the beach sand with a cup." I think you are taking the word "goals" to the extreme -- I merely meant that if a person wants more from radio than what the CB has to offer then he has three choices: 1) Memorize the question pool and get a license; 2) Operate illegally; or 3) Find another hobby. And no, the information isn't going away, but as I said before, that 'information' is incomplete. If the CBer knows all the facts then he can make a decision that's better for both him and the band. The other way is from the attitude that these laws are trivial. Technical information on how to break the law with CB radio is usually provided without any warning that its application may cause interference to CBers and non-CBers alike, and most of the time it's not said that its use can be illegal. On the contrary, some even go so far as to play lawyer, informing people that federal communcation laws are "only rules" to be ignored. Then there are those that would have people believe the fantastic, such as that CB operation is impossible without illegal modifications or equipment, or that overmodulation is a good thing, or even that RF power is the end-all-beat-all of human existence. This only encourages illegal radio, and does absolutely nothing to improve the band or the newsgroup. And it certainly doesn't help the fence-sitting CBer to make a decision that's not only responsible to himself (and perhaps to the financial security of his family should the FCC slap him with the typical multi-thousand dollar fine), but responsible to all the other CBers that will be negatively impacted by his selfishness. I cannot challenge this. You are absolutely right. But... do you think that this will "scare" seasoned CBer's and newcomers? If people want to test their chances? They will most likely will. Not to bring up a moot and previously discussed topic but does "speeding" ring a bell? Since you brought it up, speeding isn't a federal offense and doesn't carry a maximum fine of $17,000. That may scare some, while it may be nothing more than a financial risk to others. But it's DEFINITELY something that everyone should know BEFORE they make that decision. So discuss all you want. But when someone else brings up important topics that are ignored in those conversations, just remember that by attempting to supress those topics you are demonstrating your contempt for the Constitutional right to free speech, the very right you embrace while discussing radio piracy. Free Speech is Free Speech... but COME ON! This **** is OLD! Even in technical threads that have nothing to do with radio piracy ends up becoming a "thread" not "discussion" of LEGALITIES. If I wanted a Forum mommy, I would asked for one... There have been MANY technical discussions here that haven't become a thread about legalities. But you are right, many technical discussions do end up about legalities. Why? I'll tell you... Just for the sake of argument, just how technical can CB get? I mean, the CB is a radio service that was intended to have minimal technical requirements, which is why there is no license (and when a license was required in the past it required no test of technical competence). Just hook up the power, run the antenna, plug in the mic and you're working (and to think that some people make that their hobby...LOL!). Yet most technical discussions seem to be about swang, bird-watts, keydowns, amps, flame-throwing antennas and being as loud as possible. IOW, most of the technical topics here focus around -illegal- CB, and that's why legal issues come up so often. Slightly OT, why does everything here have to be about technical topics? How about making a hobby of COMMUNICATING on the CB? About the only posts made in this newsgroup even remotely close to -that- topic are Twisty's DX reports. Doesn't anybody think about what's possible with CB radio? Like, how about setting up CB broadcasts for Amber Alerts, or organizing networks for public events? When was the last time you saw any mention of the REACT program in this newsgroup? :end rant . That's like saying that we should all just lay down and die now because we are all going to die eventually. Well, feel free to do so, but I have other plans. YES! Please die. I don't care about your plans... just DIE already! If I bother you that much then maybe you should take a break from the newsgroups for a while. Contrary to your opinion, things do change. Sometimes they change for the better and sometimes for the worse, but they do change. Some people would rather promote apathy and use the "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" excuse for their lack of responsibility. Some, such as myself, would rather take an active hand in changing things for the better. Because if everybody gives up and starts doing whatever they please without conscience or restraint, the whole thing falls apart into anarchy and the FCC drops the band -- not my idea of a bright future for CB radio. As previously stated, CB radio is a hobby. Not a lifestyle. If CB radio is your "bread and butter", you might want to rethink your future. It's looking a little dim. Since its beginnings, when has CB radio "not" been in anarchy? Your choice to believe that CB is in a state of anarchy is nothing but a precursor to that "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" excuse I mentioned before. Quite a bit has changed. Anti-legal CBers such as yourself no longer control the newsgroup. WHAT? How dare you assume such? Because I look for skip on SSB makes me a "baby-killer" now? WHOA there butthole, where did I say anything about being a "baby-killer"? You need to take a step back (and probably a Valium). I could give a rats-ass about who controls the NG. I am here for technical conversations with like-minded individuals in a hobby that I enjoy. Maybe getting a HAM ticket is not my cup of tea. I could give a **** about change either. Again, I am here for technical conversations with like-minded individuals in a hobby that I enjoy. Sheesh... If you are so stupid that you can't handle the unbelievably simple requirements to get a license and operate legally, then could give a **** about your "hobby". Most have learned that everyone here has an equal voice, that our voices can't be 'stepped-on', 'keyed-over', or otherwise supressed the way they are on the radio. And loss of control over the airwaves by illegals isn't far behind: Radio direction finding technology also falls under the 'freedom of speech' umbrella, and their popularity is growing by leaps and bounds. More and more CBers are learning that they can self-police their band just like the hams, and many have learned that it can be fun at the same time. And because illegal CBers are operating with more power, less responsibility, and dirtier radios than ever before, the task isn't very difficult. Things have changed, and will continue to change whether you like it or not. I may disappear... but things will never change, Believe what you may, but no one ever dies... they just multiply. I don't suppose you have ever heard of the Anasazi.... Do whatever you feel you need to do. So will we. I knew you were gonna say that... RASTA, the Keyclown Psychic. have a good day. I usually do. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
... Is that why you are arguing with me now? Was the purpose of your original post in this thread to discuss "CB radio information"? Practice what you preach. I am just stating the facts, not arguing. Of course this information can't be supressed. But it -can- be evaluated for it's technical validity. For example, "swang" is a new word for an old concept: DSBRC (Double-SideBand Reduced Carrier), a mode given up over half a century ago because it causes more problems than it solves. So when a CB newbie listens to some dummy talking about 'bird-watts', don't you think he would like to know the truth of the matter? Of course he would, and that's all I'm doing. It's the "golden-screwdriver" techs that spread this 'information', and instead of supressing it, I just tell what the 'information' really means so the CBer can make an informed decision as to whether or not to trash his radio. Whether you like it or not, do you suppose that you are arguing about things that you and the so-called "golden crewdrivers" agree upon? Sometimes I have to re-read the posts and find out that both of you folks are saying the exact same thing, just in a different way. Maybe some people don't have the technical "tongue" like you do, but chastizing such people only degrades your validity. Do you like getting picked on? I think you are taking the word "goals" to the extreme -- That's what you wrote and I just merely responded to your post. I merely meant that if a person wants more from radio than what the CB has to offer then he has three choices: 1) Memorize the question pool and get a license; 2) Operate illegally; or 3) Find another hobby. And no, the information isn't going away, but as I said before, that 'information' is incomplete. If the CBer knows all the facts then he can make a decision that's better for both him and the band. True. Since you brought it up, speeding isn't a federal offense and doesn't carry a maximum fine of $17,000. That may scare some, while it may be nothing more than a financial risk to others. But it's DEFINITELY something that everyone should know BEFORE they make that decision. But on the contrary, Frank. Speeding can be a cause of many felonious behaviors. Like radio, like speeding. It is the same thing. Owning a radio is not a federal offense. Operating it "illegally" is. Speeding is not a federal offense. Speeding and killing someone is. Know what I mean? There have been MANY technical discussions here that haven't become a thread about legalities. But you are right, many technical discussions do end up about legalities. Why? I'll tell you... Just for the sake of argument, just how technical can CB get? I mean, the CB is a radio service that was intended to have minimal technical requirements, which is why there is no license (and when a license was required in the past it required no test of technical competence). Just hook up the power, run the antenna, plug in the mic and you're working (and to think that some people make that their hobby...LOL!). Yet most technical discussions seem to be about swang, bird-watts, keydowns, amps, flame-throwing antennas and being as loud as possible. IOW, most of the technical topics here focus around -illegal- CB, and that's why legal issues come up so often. What's wrong with that? Talking about such subjects is not illegal. Even if -encourages- such illegal activities, let them suffer the consequences. Not rub it in... Slightly OT, why does everything here have to be about technical topics? How about making a hobby of COMMUNICATING on the CB? About the only posts made in this newsgroup even remotely close to -that- topic are Twisty's DX reports. But you and your compadres BASH him for it. Doesn't anybody think about what's possible with CB radio? Like, how about setting up CB broadcasts for Amber Alerts, or organizing networks for public events? When was the last time you saw any mention of the REACT program in this newsgroup? : Have you done such a thing? You may say you do or don't, but how do I know. It's one thing to talk about starting such broadcasts and another about actually doing it. end rant Thanks... If I bother you that much then maybe you should take a break from the newsgroups for a while. It was a joke, Franklin. A little humor didn't hurt nobody. Your choice to believe that CB is in a state of anarchy is nothing but a precursor to that "if you can't beat 'em, join 'em" excuse I mentioned before. No. It is a trend. "...beat 'em, join 'em" had nothing to do with what was, did, is and will go on. And soon, like the CB boom of the '70's, it will fade away and slowly creep back up again. That's the way it is and that's the truth. WHOA there butthole, where did I say anything about being a "baby-killer"? You need to take a step back (and probably a Valium). Like you, like me... I just posted my reaction to your post. I wish I could get ahold of some Valium right now... my back is killing me. If you are so stupid that you can't handle the unbelievably simple requirements to get a license and operate legally, then could give a **** about your "hobby". NOW I'M STUPID... when does it stop, Frank? You're the stupid one that frequents this NG day in and day out, EVERYday for the past (3) years since my last post. I've read and you're still here. And you just don't get the notion that you are the subject of mockery by everyone here (except your AKC cheering section). And you're calling me stupid? I work on my Harley instead of messing with these cats in here that do not get the message you and the AKC is trying to promote. I don't suppose you have ever heard of the Anasazi.... That was then... this is now. You mean to tell me you are going to be a cultural influence and change things over night? How about something more previous in history... have you ever heard of "BUCKWHEAT" ?snicker RASTA, the Keyclown Psychic. No. Just a RASTA... we tell the truth. have a good day. I usually do. When you do have a nice day, you usually shoot that **** down by coming here and getting your blood-pressure up. What is this about you drinking now? But really, have a good one. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Cranium" wrote in message om... You, Frankie-boy, Georgie-girl, and others have attempted to control other people thru trolling for quite some time. It hasn't worked, it doesn't work, it won't work. If FCC enforcement hasn't worked, what makes you believe that your lame trolling will? You are quite correct: Ain't nothing gonna change it. All you can do is control yourself, something you're really poor at. That applies to you, Aanal Aaron, to Frankie-boy, to Georgie-girl, and the others. So why bother taking up space here to complain about it? Why do you bother posting and taking up space regarding what we do ? It is a free world and as a USA citizen we are afforded many of lifes great pleasures posting to this NG is one of them. Now go troll someone elses posts. |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Richard Cranium" wrote in message om... (Aaron H. Voobner) wrote in message . com... Chim Bubba wrote: Me too! Always have. That is the main reason for coming here but as was mentioned by others before. The crap that goes on in this group NEVER and I mean NEVER even affects the real guy on the cb. So what's your problem? Why even waste your energy of coming in here and complaining about it? It's been going on for so long, nothing's ever gonna change it.You can't accomplish anything with whining.It's a losing battle. It's like trying to drain the ocean with a teacup.You might as well just give up.What you're doing is useless. (sarcasm/irony intentional) That's actually the most reasonable and logical thing I've ever seen you post, Aanal Aaron. Too bad you're trying to impose it on others, instead of applying it to yourself. You, Frankie-boy, Georgie-girl, and others have attempted to control other people thru trolling for quite some time. It hasn't worked, it doesn't work, it won't work. If FCC enforcement hasn't worked, what makes you believe that your lame trolling will? You are quite correct: Ain't nothing gonna change it. All you can do is control yourself, something you're really poor at. That applies to you, Aanal Aaron, to Frankie-boy, to Georgie-girl, and the others. So why bother taking up space here to complain about it? CBers are aware of the Rules, and a few of them make a decision to violate them. You are not an FCC operative (if you are, what's your badge number?), nor are any of the other trolls. Hell, Frankie-boy isn't a ham or a "commercial broadcast engineer" as he has claimed. He's lucky if he's even a tech. Thus, you might as well give it up. The best you can do is operate your CB legally and try to set an example. Nothing else is going to do anything but raise your blood pressure. That's not Aaron, he's posting from a DoD account. Aaron used AOL. I still think someone should report him for wasting tax payers money trolling the newsgroup. Think about it, you are paying taxes to let this person troll the newsgroup. Landshark -- You can stand tall without standing on someone. You can be a victor without having victims. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1412 Â September 3, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newslineâ„¢ Report 1402 Â June 25, 2004 | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1400  June 11, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | General | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline™ Report 1379 – January 16, 2004 | Dx |