Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , Earl Johnston
wrote: On Mon, 14 Jul 2003 17:29:58 -0700, Frank Gilliland wrote: In , Earl Johnston wrote: ... In most of the world, anything which is not forbidden, is permitted. You haven't seen very much of the world first-hand, have you? Not nearly as much as I'd like to. Have travelled exttensively through Canada, US, Mexico, England, Scotland & Wales. Admittedly, most of the information I have is second hand.. Australian Uncle, ...Father and Mother travelled extensively for years through Europe and the far East..Dad worked in India for some time..My Daughter who works in Hong Kong, just came home from 4 months in Mainland China. While there is no substitute for first hand experience, in today's information age, a great deal of knowledge about a place can be gained without actually being on the ground. While I may not have the stamps in my passport that others do, my lack of world travel experience does not invalidate my position that in most countries where the rule of law prevails, anything which is not forbidden, is permitted. I spent a little time in the Middle East. While I was there I learned that there are places you don't go, people you don't talk to, things you don't say, etc, even though there is no law forbidding such things. I have been other places as well, and it's pretty much the same way everywhere I went. The US is pretty unique in that we need every single little rule of conduct to be codified as law in explicit terms before people finally decide to behave themselves. But as exemplified in this newsgroup and on the Citizen's Band, even -that- doesn't always work. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 80,000 Newsgroups - 16 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|