| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
Though doth protest too much...
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ... While firmly installed on Georgina's hand, Socko "George Is Innocent" wrote... No similar complaints about the voobie websites? You mean the one that refers to me as a Brummy M&S van driver... rather like Voob and George do? You know, if I did protest to that, It would be said that I protest too much. It would be assumed, by the "antis", that my protests were proof that the suggestions on the page were real. Whoever put up the site with nude george and voobsie pics is not as bad? So, they really are pictures of the infamous duo... cool. How did someone get hold of nude pictures of them? Strange how, when that site seems to be systematically working it's way through the newsgroup regulars, none of whom are whining about it, the one page you whine about is the one with "George" on it. Hey, Mr "innocent"... Methinks thou doth protest too much. BINGO!!!!!!! Landshark -- You can stand tall without standing on someone. You can be a victor without having victims. |
Landshark wrote:
"Brainbuster" wrote in message ... While firmly installed on Georgina's hand, Socko "George Is Innocent" wrote... No similar complaints about the voobie websites? You mean the one that refers to me as a Brummy M&S van driver... rather like Voob and George do? You know, if I did protest to that, It would be said that I protest too much. It would be assumed, by the "antis", that my protests were proof that the suggestions on the page were real. Whoever put up the site with nude george and voobsie pics is not as bad? So, they really are pictures of the infamous duo... cool. How did someone get hold of nude pictures of them? Strange how, when that site seems to be systematically working it's way through the newsgroup regulars, none of whom are whining about it, the one page you whine about is the one with "George" on it. Hey, Mr "innocent"... Methinks thou doth protest too much. BINGO!!!!!!! So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about you that isn't true, should you: A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers? B. Ignore it, and then have it implied that it must be true since no one ever denied it? A real catch 22 if I ever saw one. Dave "Sandbagger" |
jim wrote:
Dave Hall wrote: Landshark wrote: "Brainbuster" wrote in message ... While firmly installed on Georgina's hand, Socko "George Is Innocent" wrote... No similar complaints about the voobie websites? You mean the one that refers to me as a Brummy M&S van driver... rather like Voob and George do? You know, if I did protest to that, It would be said that I protest too much. It would be assumed, by the "antis", that my protests were proof that the suggestions on the page were real. Whoever put up the site with nude george and voobsie pics is not as bad? So, they really are pictures of the infamous duo... cool. How did someone get hold of nude pictures of them? Strange how, when that site seems to be systematically working it's way through the newsgroup regulars, none of whom are whining about it, the one page you whine about is the one with "George" on it. Hey, Mr "innocent"... Methinks thou doth protest too much. BINGO!!!!!!! So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about you that isn't true, should you: A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers? B. Ignore it, and then have it implied that it must be true since no one ever denied it? A real catch 22 if I ever saw one. Dave "Sandbagger" C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. D. Rock on. -- GO #40 |
|
jim wrote:
wrote: D. Rock on. opening night. j e t s Wanna bum out? Turn on A&E right now. Home videos from 9/11..ugghh. I want to go hang a _______________!! -- GO #40 |
|
In , jim wrote:
snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. ignore it. |
In , jim wrote:
Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , jim wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. You'd be better off ignoring all that. jmo -- GO #40 |
wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. You'd be better off ignoring all that. jmo agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers? |
|
|
|
jim wrote:
wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. You'd be better off ignoring all that. jmo agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers? Welcome to usenet, talk to people, ridicule some, make a few friends, repeat as needed. -- GO #40 |
wrote: jim wrote: wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. You'd be better off ignoring all that. jmo agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers? Welcome to usenet, talk to people, ridicule some, make a few friends, repeat as needed. as emeril would say, add a touch of essence and bammmmmmmm |
jim wrote:
as emeril would say, add a touch of essence and bammmmmmmm Damn, now I'm pondering a strip steak on the grill. You gave me the friggin munchies Jim. -- GO #40 |
In , jim wrote:
wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: Frank Gilliland wrote: In , jim wrote: snip C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. How hard would you laugh if someone accused you -by name- of being a child molester? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- innocent until proven guilty frank. In an ideal society. ignore it. Naw. It's more fun demonstrating how these nameless, gutless, spineless, spoiled little mama's boys don't have enough integrity or courage to put a name to their hate. That way, when they accuse someone else of such a thing (or something worse), it will carry no more weight than a Clinton deposition. You'd be better off ignoring all that. jmo agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers? How do you get that impression? I thought I just got done saying that I despise those people that are primarily responsible for the "mud", yet somehow you think I meant just the opposite. Is it because I refused to abide by your advice to ignore such things? -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
"Landshark" . wrote:
If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. All this chatter about A's website, and yet no linkage!?!? http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/ -- GO #40 |
wrote in message ... "Landshark" . wrote: If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. All this chatter about A's website, and yet no linkage!?!? http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/ -- GO #40 LOL!!! Sounds like to much natural gas????????? Landshark -- Try these to learn about newsgroup trolls. http://www.io.com/~zikzak/troll_thesis.html http://members.aol.com/intwg/trolls.htm |
"Landshark" . wrote:
wrote in message ... "Landshark" . wrote: If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. All this chatter about A's website, and yet no linkage!?!? http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/ -- GO #40 LOL!!! Sounds like to much natural gas????????? Landshark That's what the old lady will say around 2 am or so. lol I've got a fairly easy day tomorrow, mostly estimates. I might wash it down with a Rolling Rock too. peeeeuuu! 10-4 (on topic now) -- GO #40 |
"Landshark" . wrote:
Time for me to hit the hay. 5am and then take the Bronco back to the body shop to finish it up. Got it running, new interior, new paint, new seals, glass etc etc ready to rock. Landshark Sounds good, Shark. We can decide where the antenna goes next week. -- GO #40 |
In , "Landshark"
. wrote: snip If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. Would you please explain that to Twisty? She seems to have a real problem with such simple concepts. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Landshark wrote:
BINGO!!!!!!! So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about you that isn't true, should you: A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers? If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. I'm not sure that a legal case would be winnable, given the relative anonymity of the internet. B. Ignore it, and then have it implied that it must be true since no one ever denied it? Really? I thought it was inocent until proven guilty, if it's not true, why worry. That only applies in a court of law, not the court of public opinion. But your point is well taken. It would seem that the people who complain the loudest must be bothered by something, or had a nerve struck. In this case, silence really is golden. Leave them guess. Dave "Sandbagger" |
jim wrote in :
agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers? Certainly not me. I usually don't even read the mudslinging posts. -- Alan Strawinski http://alan.strawinski.net |
|
"Curious Dan" wrote:
wrote in message ... You shouldnt eat steak this late Moped, it isnt good for your figure. I know, I get kinda gassy after...my wife said the same thing too. Too late though, it's almost done..i just have to kick it up a notch.. -- GO #40 Ill tell you what you did that almost as good as Emril BAM!! ;) -- GO #40 |
Alan Strawinski wrote:
jim wrote in : agreed. other than frank, who gives a rats ass about the mud being slung on this obscure piece of usenet? any takers? Certainly not me. I usually don't even read the mudslinging posts. I only like positive thoughts. -- GO #40 |
Dave Hall wrote:
Landshark wrote: BINGO!!!!!!! So what is the moral to this story? If someone puts up a web site about you that isn't true, should you: A. Deny the accusations, and then be accused of "protesting too much", thereby lending some implied credibility to the accusers? If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. I'm not sure that a legal case would be winnable, given the relative anonymity of the internet. Right! Who's Aaron? http://www.geocities.com/aarronvoobner/ -- GO #40 |
|
Frank Gilliland wrote in message ...
In , "Landshark" . wrote: snip If "Aaron" was a real person, he could then make a claim of defamation, but since he isn't real, no defamation. Would you please explain that to Twisty? She seems to have a real problem with such simple concepts. Hi Frank. The way I see it, it's a question of interpretation and intent. For example... If someone said that they are going to kill Superman, it is clearly not a threat to a person... he is a totally fictional charater. However, if someone on this newsgroup said that they was going to find "Sparky" and kill him... I would consider that as a threat on the person known to use that nicname - you. Sure, they may not know where you are, but can you be sure that they will not find out? If somebody is determined enough, they may just find out. A little piece of info here, a little bit there... it can add up. "Sparky" may not be your real name, but you are a real person. When someone is only known to us as "Twistedhed", then how would you expect someone to threaten him, except by using that name? Brainbuster. |
jim wrote in message
... C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. Will you take that option if you appear on the "Voobie" Website? Regards, Peter. |
On 05 Sep 2003 01:20:05 GMT, wrote:
jim wrote: wrote: D. Rock on. opening night. j e t s Wanna bum out? Turn on A&E right now. Home videos from 9/11..ugghh. I want to go hang a _______________!! Glad I missed it, a friend of mine who I worked with when I was helping out up there sent me a cd he made as a tribute to those who lost their lives, pictures and video clips set to music. I can't watch the damn thing. And to top it all off, I used to love listening to bagpipes, but after all the funerals I attended in NYC , bagpipes especially "amazing grace" tear me up. 73 de Keith -- KC8TCQ ARRL Member - ARES |
|
|
|
"Keith Hosman" wrote in message ... On 07 Sep 2003 15:38:52 GMT, wrote: Emeril rocks, I've thought about sending him my prize winning chili recipe.. Post it here..I love good chilli..mmmmmmm! Ok, I never use measurements so it's not going to be exact. and I use absolutely no chili powder or canned items. I usually make huge batches so I'll try to adjust down (from 20 lbs. of meat to a more family oriented size) Start with 2 pounds of italian sausage and 2 pounds of ground beef. put them in a iron skillet with 2 large fresh chopped onions, 2 cloves of fresh crushed garlic, fresh green bell peppers diced, fresh jalapeno peppers dices, fresh thai chili peppers diced. Cooking the peppers, onions, and garlic together with the meat brings out the flavors. When the meat is just about completely cooked I pour in about 2 ounces of jack daniels, the alcohol cooks off but leaves a good flavor. While the meat is cooking I have a stock pot going at a slow simmer with the beans (I use a combination of pinto, black, and kidney beans, there were dried beans that I soaked and cooked) tomato sauce, and diced tomatoes. When the meat is completely cooked I put the contents from the skillet into the stock pot, and as a finishing touch I put just a pinch of brown sugar and shave just a bit of cinnamon, some sweet to go with the heat gives it that extra touch. You'll have to experiment with the ammount of peppers to use depending on how spicy you like your chili. I slow cook mine for about 3 days, I like it thick. 73 de Keith -- KC8TCQ ARRL Member - ARES Sounds great! Post saved for future cooking. Landshark -- The happy people are those who are producing something; the bored people are those who are consuming much and producing nothing. |
Keith Hosman wrote:
On 07 Sep 2003 15:38:52 GMT, wrote: Emeril rocks, I've thought about sending him my prize winning chili recipe.. Post it here..I love good chilli..mmmmmmm! Ok, I never use measurements so it's not going to be exact. and I use absolutely no chili powder or canned items. I usually make huge batches so I'll try to adjust down (from 20 lbs. of meat to a more family oriented size) Start with 2 pounds of italian sausage and 2 pounds of ground beef. put them in a iron skillet with 2 large fresh chopped onions, 2 cloves of fresh crushed garlic, fresh green bell peppers diced, fresh jalapeno peppers dices, fresh thai chili peppers diced. Cooking the peppers, onions, and garlic together with the meat brings out the flavors. When the meat is just about completely cooked I pour in about 2 ounces of jack daniels, the alcohol cooks off but leaves a good flavor. While the meat is cooking I have a stock pot going at a slow simmer with the beans (I use a combination of pinto, black, and kidney beans, there were dried beans that I soaked and cooked) tomato sauce, and diced tomatoes. When the meat is completely cooked I put the contents from the skillet into the stock pot, and as a finishing touch I put just a pinch of brown sugar and shave just a bit of cinnamon, some sweet to go with the heat gives it that extra touch. You'll have to experiment with the ammount of peppers to use depending on how spicy you like your chili. I slow cook mine for about 3 days, I like it thick. 73 de Keith Hey, that sounds pretty good. I may have to try a batch of it. I sometimes add some ground bambi to mine, think that would be ok? -- GO #40 |
Brainbuster wrote: jim wrote in message ... C. laugh at ones self and not worry about it. Will you take that option if you appear on the "Voobie" Website? Regards, Peter. if he (or she) wants to post something inane about me then cheers.... |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:53 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com