![]() |
Lancerm Who said anything about velocity factor? 'Doc |
BuckEye, But all antennas are 'matched', be they exactly a 1/4 wave length long, or 75 feet long, or 1 inch long. I'm assuming that you mean impedance matching, right? Impedance matching has nothing to do with an antenna being resonant. 'Doc |
BuckEye wrote: Your lost as bad as last years Easter egg. Go back to school. Wherever you have gotten the antenna info apply it . Learn something, don't just try to quote out of a book, any one can do that. Your very confused. I need to get back to some serious work designing antennas. Instead of doing serious, or not-so-serious antenna design, you might take a look at some of those books you imply we shouldn't quote from, and apply what you've read. And you're wrong, not every one can do that, much less understand what they read (got a mirror?). There are some things that you can 'infer' from what you've read, not everything has to be spelled out in black and white. That process is the one you refer to as thinking... Have fun designing antennas, I do. 'Doc PS - Around here they say, "Don't know whether he's washing or hanging out.". |
What the hell do you think I am saying.
This all started when some dumass said a antenna was electrically 1/4 wave long, not 1/4 wave antenna. You either have a 1/4 wave antenna or you don't. If its shorter, then its not a 1/4 wave antenna. In most cases it loaded, and no more electrically a 1/4 wave long antenna. How hard is this to understand. I think this comes from some adds that's states it a helical loaded 1/4 wave antenna that is only 56" long which is bull . Just like some other adds that claim their antenna is a 5/8 antenna wound on a fiberglass rod only 5' tall now go figure, I guess some also believe this . "'Doc" wrote in message ... BuckEye, But all antennas are 'matched', be they exactly a 1/4 wave length long, or 75 feet long, or 1 inch long. I'm assuming that you mean impedance matching, right? Impedance matching has nothing to do with an antenna being resonant. 'Doc |
Hrm.. ever stop to think that maybe the wire helically wound around
the shaft might be 1/4 wave long? That would make it a 1/4 wave helically loaded antenna. Just because the physical length of the antenna is less than 1/4 wave at the desired frequency doesn't mean the antenna isn't. Don't believe me? Try looking up "folded dipole" on the 'net.. -SSB BuckEye wrote: What the hell do you think I am saying. This all started when some dumass said a antenna was electrically 1/4 wave long, not 1/4 wave antenna. You either have a 1/4 wave antenna or you don't. If its shorter, then its not a 1/4 wave antenna. In most cases it loaded, and no more electrically a 1/4 wave long antenna. How hard is this to understand. I think this comes from some adds that's states it a helical loaded 1/4 wave antenna that is only 56" long which is bull . Just like some other adds that claim their antenna is a 5/8 antenna wound on a fiberglass rod only 5' tall now go figure, I guess some also believe this . "'Doc" wrote in message ... BuckEye, But all antennas are 'matched', be they exactly a 1/4 wave length long, or 75 feet long, or 1 inch long. I'm assuming that you mean impedance matching, right? Impedance matching has nothing to do with an antenna being resonant. 'Doc |
"Steveo" wrote in message ... "Landshark" wrote: "Steveo" wrote in message ... Lancer wrote: It would be interesting to see the 102" fiberglass against the S/S whip. With trees? Duh!!! shredded........................ Landshark Shattered! sha-doobie Rolling Stones, Black & Blue I think. Landshark -- Hard things are put in our way, not to stop us, but to call out our courage and strength. |
In rYlob.66399$Tr4.188400@attbi_s03, "BuckEye" wrote:
What the hell do you think I am saying. This all started when some dumass said a antenna was electrically 1/4 wave long, not 1/4 wave antenna. You either have a 1/4 wave antenna or you don't. If its shorter, then its not a 1/4 wave antenna. In most cases it loaded, and no more electrically a 1/4 wave long antenna. How hard is this to understand. I think this comes from some adds that's states it a helical loaded 1/4 wave antenna that is only 56" long which is bull . Just like some other adds that claim their antenna is a 5/8 antenna wound on a fiberglass rod only 5' tall now go figure, I guess some also believe this . Gee, so you finally read a book and discovered that you were wrong. Fine. But playing semantics in order to save face is a Twistedhedism. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
BuckEye, Hi. 'Dumass' here. Like it or not, antennas can and are classified and/or described by their 'electrical' length. Electrical length and physical length don't have to be the same and seldom are when speaking about 'loaded' antennas. When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. Is it mandatory that you think about antennas the same way I do? Nope, sure isn't, but it does help if you at least understand 'where' the other person is coming from, or talking about. It always helps to view things from a different perspective. When you don't, the loss is yours... 'Doc |
On Thu, 30 Oct 2003 18:04:14 -0600, 'Doc wrote:
Lancerm Who said anything about velocity factor? 'Doc BuckEye did in this post: Velocity factor IS importment when cutting a element to the proper length. Typically a antenna element can range from .91 to .99 of the true open space length. |
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:35:36 -0600, 'Doc wrote:
BuckEye, Hi. 'Dumass' here. Like it or not, antennas can and are classified and/or described by their 'electrical' length. Electrical length and physical length don't have to be the same and seldom are when speaking about 'loaded' antennas. When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. Is it mandatory that you think about antennas the same way I do? Nope, sure isn't, but it does help if you at least understand 'where' the other person is coming from, or talking about. It always helps to view things from a different perspective. When you don't, the loss is yours... 'Doc Doc; I think he was calling me the dumbass, not you. At first I just thought he didn't understand the theory that was being posted here and wanted to learn. Hopefully he won't have the same problems reading a book. Like you said his loss. |
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:11 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com