Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 28 Oct 2003 00:24:47 GMT, Steveo
wrote: wrote: Ther's no misconception. Nope. Just a bunch of hoo ha, and arguments about field strength meter readings. I'm gonna buy an X-terminator, and compare it in the real world application. If it's near as good as the 108"er, I'll be happy. Thanks for the tip. Tnom. If you get the opportunity to swap the 108" SS with the X-Terminator feel free to report the results. One way or the other. I'd love to see someone else do a test. Be forewarned. If your results are in favor of the X-Terminator you'll get flack for reporting the results. Your test will be examined and will be deemed as being flawed. If your test shows the 108" SS as the superior antenna then the obvious will happen. Your post will be accepted as legit and there will be no argument over the results. Even though the test parameters were the same. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doppler DF whip length | Antenna | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Hygain 18AVT/WB Parts Traps, 80m coil whip etc. | Antenna |