Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
sideband wrote in
.com: I know you're using a fake name, and that's OK in my book. I'm just trying to figure out what the parameters of the test were so I can put weight to your measurements. Thanks. -SSB They were similiar to tnom's and un-repeatable. |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() Neil Down wrote: sideband wrote in y.com: I know you're using a fake name, and that's OK in my book. I'm just trying to figure out what the parameters of the test were so I can put weight to your measurements. Thanks. -SSB They were similiar to tnom's and un-repeatable. I agree with George. |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
If they're not repeatable, then they're not really very scientific..
and here I was looking for a reason to put a 102" whip back on the truck for CB. ::shrug:: -SSB Neil Down wrote: sideband wrote in .com: I know you're using a fake name, and that's OK in my book. I'm just trying to figure out what the parameters of the test were so I can put weight to your measurements. Thanks. -SSB They were similiar to tnom's and un-repeatable. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doppler DF whip length | Antenna | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Hygain 18AVT/WB Parts Traps, 80m coil whip etc. | Antenna |