Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
|
#1
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What makes a antenna so called " looks like a 1/4 wave again to the RF".
Where does it say a matching antenna must look like a 1/4 anyway. "Add a coil to make up the missing inductance and the antenna "looks" like a 1/4 wave again to the RF, not so, the impedance is now very low at its feed point. Big mismatch (you forgot the extra device now needed to match the antenna,usally a cap or coil on the input side.so adding just a loading coil did not make it look like a match.Notice I said a match . NOT a 1/4 wave. RF doesn't care what the wavelength is. Where does it say a antenna must "look like a 1/4 anyway." The same thing could be said about a base matched 5/8 wave antenna, it shows a good match also and its is a long way from the 1/4 wave length. and is never said it looks like a 1/4 to the RF. Don't confuse a match to it looking like a 1/4. There is many things that can be changed at the antenna mounting spot, 1/2 wave 5/8 wave |
#2
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BuckEye, But all antennas are 'matched', be they exactly a 1/4 wave length long, or 75 feet long, or 1 inch long. I'm assuming that you mean impedance matching, right? Impedance matching has nothing to do with an antenna being resonant. 'Doc |
#3
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
What the hell do you think I am saying.
This all started when some dumass said a antenna was electrically 1/4 wave long, not 1/4 wave antenna. You either have a 1/4 wave antenna or you don't. If its shorter, then its not a 1/4 wave antenna. In most cases it loaded, and no more electrically a 1/4 wave long antenna. How hard is this to understand. I think this comes from some adds that's states it a helical loaded 1/4 wave antenna that is only 56" long which is bull . Just like some other adds that claim their antenna is a 5/8 antenna wound on a fiberglass rod only 5' tall now go figure, I guess some also believe this . "'Doc" wrote in message ... BuckEye, But all antennas are 'matched', be they exactly a 1/4 wave length long, or 75 feet long, or 1 inch long. I'm assuming that you mean impedance matching, right? Impedance matching has nothing to do with an antenna being resonant. 'Doc |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Hrm.. ever stop to think that maybe the wire helically wound around
the shaft might be 1/4 wave long? That would make it a 1/4 wave helically loaded antenna. Just because the physical length of the antenna is less than 1/4 wave at the desired frequency doesn't mean the antenna isn't. Don't believe me? Try looking up "folded dipole" on the 'net.. -SSB BuckEye wrote: What the hell do you think I am saying. This all started when some dumass said a antenna was electrically 1/4 wave long, not 1/4 wave antenna. You either have a 1/4 wave antenna or you don't. If its shorter, then its not a 1/4 wave antenna. In most cases it loaded, and no more electrically a 1/4 wave long antenna. How hard is this to understand. I think this comes from some adds that's states it a helical loaded 1/4 wave antenna that is only 56" long which is bull . Just like some other adds that claim their antenna is a 5/8 antenna wound on a fiberglass rod only 5' tall now go figure, I guess some also believe this . "'Doc" wrote in message ... BuckEye, But all antennas are 'matched', be they exactly a 1/4 wave length long, or 75 feet long, or 1 inch long. I'm assuming that you mean impedance matching, right? Impedance matching has nothing to do with an antenna being resonant. 'Doc |
#5
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In rYlob.66399$Tr4.188400@attbi_s03, "BuckEye" wrote:
What the hell do you think I am saying. This all started when some dumass said a antenna was electrically 1/4 wave long, not 1/4 wave antenna. You either have a 1/4 wave antenna or you don't. If its shorter, then its not a 1/4 wave antenna. In most cases it loaded, and no more electrically a 1/4 wave long antenna. How hard is this to understand. I think this comes from some adds that's states it a helical loaded 1/4 wave antenna that is only 56" long which is bull . Just like some other adds that claim their antenna is a 5/8 antenna wound on a fiberglass rod only 5' tall now go figure, I guess some also believe this . Gee, so you finally read a book and discovered that you were wrong. Fine. But playing semantics in order to save face is a Twistedhedism. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#6
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() BuckEye, Hi. 'Dumass' here. Like it or not, antennas can and are classified and/or described by their 'electrical' length. Electrical length and physical length don't have to be the same and seldom are when speaking about 'loaded' antennas. When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. Is it mandatory that you think about antennas the same way I do? Nope, sure isn't, but it does help if you at least understand 'where' the other person is coming from, or talking about. It always helps to view things from a different perspective. When you don't, the loss is yours... 'Doc |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:35:36 -0600, 'Doc wrote:
BuckEye, Hi. 'Dumass' here. Like it or not, antennas can and are classified and/or described by their 'electrical' length. Electrical length and physical length don't have to be the same and seldom are when speaking about 'loaded' antennas. When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. Is it mandatory that you think about antennas the same way I do? Nope, sure isn't, but it does help if you at least understand 'where' the other person is coming from, or talking about. It always helps to view things from a different perspective. When you don't, the loss is yours... 'Doc Doc; I think he was calling me the dumbass, not you. At first I just thought he didn't understand the theory that was being posted here and wanted to learn. Hopefully he won't have the same problems reading a book. Like you said his loss. |
#8
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , 'Doc wrote:
snip When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. Wise words for anyone in a similar predicament, and especially for certain paranoid individuals who incorrectly perceive the situation as some sort of newsgroup conspiracy. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
#9
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Quoted:
When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. That's strange. Even Einstein found himself in that position. |
#10
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In 7ZDob.73697$Tr4.195089@attbi_s03, "BuckEye" wrote:
Quoted: When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. That's strange. Even Einstein found himself in that position. Einstein re-evaluated his position many times. In fact, in his later papers, he expressed doubts about the validity of much of his work. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doppler DF whip length | Antenna | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Hygain 18AVT/WB Parts Traps, 80m coil whip etc. | Antenna |