Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#22
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Fri, 31 Oct 2003 05:35:36 -0600, 'Doc wrote:
BuckEye, Hi. 'Dumass' here. Like it or not, antennas can and are classified and/or described by their 'electrical' length. Electrical length and physical length don't have to be the same and seldom are when speaking about 'loaded' antennas. When you find your self in a situation where everyone else seems to be wrong, and only you are right, it sometimes helps to stop and re-evaluate your position. Is it mandatory that you think about antennas the same way I do? Nope, sure isn't, but it does help if you at least understand 'where' the other person is coming from, or talking about. It always helps to view things from a different perspective. When you don't, the loss is yours... 'Doc Doc; I think he was calling me the dumbass, not you. At first I just thought he didn't understand the theory that was being posted here and wanted to learn. Hopefully he won't have the same problems reading a book. Like you said his loss. |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Doppler DF whip length | Antenna | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Ohio/Penn DX Bulletin #649 | Dx | |||
Effect of whip diameter on resonant frequency | Antenna | |||
Hygain 18AVT/WB Parts Traps, 80m coil whip etc. | Antenna |