Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:56:34 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote: Twist, I'd ask you to explain to the gentleman that you won't be adding 'taps' to inductors; you'll need more inductance, not more taps. But then, I'd be asking you to lower yourself to his level. I don't think you are capable of thinking that slowly. ![]() 73 from Rochester, NY Jim He said " has components to cover 160 with some addl inductor taps" That means he has a large enough inductor with a unused section that includes taps that will increase the inductance for 160 . Who's thinking to slowly? |