LinkBack Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #4   Report Post  
Old November 12th 03, 09:09 PM
 
Posts: n/a
Default

On Wed, 12 Nov 2003 20:56:34 GMT, "Jim Hampton"
wrote:

Twist,

I'd ask you to explain to the gentleman that you won't be adding 'taps' to
inductors; you'll need more inductance, not more taps. But then, I'd be
asking you to lower yourself to his level. I don't think you are capable of
thinking that slowly.

73 from Rochester, NY
Jim


He said " has components to cover 160 with some addl inductor taps"
That means he has a large enough inductor with a unused section that
includes taps that will increase the inductance for 160 .

Who's thinking to slowly?


 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules

Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



All times are GMT +1. The time now is 03:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright ©2004-2025 RadioBanter.
The comments are property of their posters.
 

About Us

"It's about Radio"

 

Copyright © 2017