In , wrote:

On Tue, 09 Dec 2003 19:51:03 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , wrote:


I would tell you to go back to school but I'm afraid that wouldn't
help. What you actually need is common sense. You actually believe
that a SSB voice amplifier operation can be directly compared to a
music audio amplifier operation.


The envelope of an SSB signal is nothing more than pure audio. That's what makes
it so much more efficient than AM -- no overhead from a continuous carrier, and
no redundancy due to an extra sideband. Got a public library nearby? Need a
reference?


I see you are ignoring compression again.

We all no the truth now. Your SSB signal has no compression, therefore
you sound like a mouse. No wonder no one pays any attention to what
you say.


Sure it does. Just like a power supply. A half wave power supply take
more filter caps than a full wave. Just like a power supply the more
current you draw the more capacitance needed. Compression has
everything to do with audio caps. The caps need time to recover to be
useful. If the signal is compressed the recovery time is shortened.

"COMPRESSION HAS EVERTHING TO DO WITH IT, YOU IMBECILE!!!"


Are you compressing the audio into a square wave, Tnom?







=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----