In , wrote:

snip
"you worthless pile of troll dung"


"Common sense" is not "fact", nor is it objective. You were whining about facts
earlier. Where are your facts?


I already stated the facts. I'll quote it again.

"you worthless pile of troll dung"

And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?






=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?

You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank

In , wrote:


And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?

You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank


Oh, I get it. You want the last word, as if that will somehow substantiate your
claims in the absence of facts. Go for it, Tnom.






=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Wed, 10 Dec 2003 23:49:54 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , wrote:


And every word is absolutely true as long as you fail to provide facts to back
up your bull****. Got math?

You want math...........Troll + Fiction = Frank


Oh, I get it. You want the last word, as if that will somehow substantiate your
claims in the absence of facts. Go for it, Tnom.

No. I just stated the facts. You and your fellow anti-CBer's, don't
even suggest that you promote the hobby, have no purpose in this
group other than to cause as much disruption as you can. You have
proven this time and time again.

That's not true at all. Frank is filled with lot's of useless information that
nobody needs to know.



No. I just stated the facts. You and your fellow anti-CBer's, don't
even suggest that you promote the hobby, have no purpose in this
group other than to cause as much disruption as you can. You have
proven this time and time again.

In ,
(AstroDome3cx5000) wrote:

That's not true at all. Frank is filled with lot's of useless information that
nobody needs to know.



No. I just stated the facts. You and your fellow anti-CBer's, don't
even suggest that you promote the hobby, have no purpose in this
group other than to cause as much disruption as you can. You have
proven this time and time again.




My newsreader must have missed Tnoms post:

You claim to state the facts, but you don't even know what the facts are. I am
-not- against CB. I'm a CBer myself. I -do- encourage people to use CB =as the
service was intended to be used=. And even though I don't respect the flagrant
violations of law that are done by CBers and Hammies alike, nor do I agree with
the in-your-face theory of changing laws, I -do- encourage people to learn a bit
about what they are doing from an electronics perspective. Part of that consists
of CB myth-busting and exposing voodoo techs. It also consists of discussing RF
amplifier topologies -- just as long as it gives people a better understanding
of how radio really works. And just to clue you in, Tnom, radio works based on
principles of physics that have been applied sucessfully for over a century, the
effects of which are measurable, predictable, and for all practical purposes,
FACT. It does -not- work by ignoring those facts in favor of unqualified
assumptions such as "won't make a difference" and overly simplistic principles
such as "it's part of a bigger picture" (did you hear that, Skippy?).

Now, where are your facts, Tnom? Where's the math?







=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Thu, 11 Dec 2003 20:55:06 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In ,
(AstroDome3cx5000) wrote:

That's not true at all. Frank is filled with lot's of useless information that
nobody needs to know.



No. I just stated the facts. You and your fellow anti-CBer's, don't
even suggest that you promote the hobby, have no purpose in this
group other than to cause as much disruption as you can. You have
proven this time and time again.




My newsreader must have missed Tnoms post:

You claim to state the facts, but you don't even know what the facts are. I am
-not- against CB. I'm a CBer myself. I -do- encourage people to use CB =as the
service was intended to be used=. And even though I don't respect the flagrant
violations of law that are done by CBers and Hammies alike, nor do I agree with
the in-your-face theory of changing laws, I -do- encourage people to learn a bit
about what they are doing from an electronics perspective. Part of that consists
of CB myth-busting and exposing voodoo techs. It also consists of discussing RF
amplifier topologies -- just as long as it gives people a better understanding
of how radio really works. And just to clue you in, Tnom, radio works based on
principles of physics that have been applied sucessfully for over a century, the
effects of which are measurable, predictable, and for all practical purposes,
FACT. It does -not- work by ignoring those facts in favor of unqualified
assumptions such as "won't make a difference" and overly simplistic principles
such as "it's part of a bigger picture" (did you hear that, Skippy?).

Now, where are your facts, Tnom? Where's the math?


I wouldn't give you anything other than it is blatantly obvious that
you are no friend to this news group, regardless of your opinion of
yourself.

Here are the facts, Frankie,,the ones you conveniently left out. In
adition to your self-stated,, horn-blowing non-achievements and posts,
you also are rude and ignorant, your posts laden with unprovoked insults
to any and all who ever disagreed with you on any subject. You attempted
to intimidate me by posting and reposting a name you thought was mine
that you since then have backed off,,,,LOL,wht happened to that "I
guarantee Twisty is Dave McCampbell"?,,,LOL. Fool.
You can paint your self-image with any brush you wish,it matters
none,,,this group sees you for what I have made you.,,a mad, stark
raving lunatic with no life and a penchant for foul language and induced
strife on the ng. A regular loser...LOL!