Thats great if we all talked ina single sinusoidal wave form voice. I think
what is trying to be explained here is taking the Crest factor of the Output
of the amplifier. Seeing that Audio output is still dynamic, there is a
averaging or Crest factor involved.

Hey but what do I know, I am a retard Audio head, that has kind plays with
RF as a hobby.

"Frank Gilliland" wrote in message
...
In , wrote:


I would tell you to go back to school but I'm afraid that wouldn't
help. What you actually need is common sense. You actually believe
that a SSB voice amplifier operation can be directly compared to a
music audio amplifier operation.


The envelope of an SSB signal is nothing more than pure audio. That's
what makes
it so much more efficient than AM -- no overhead from a continuous
carrier, and
no redundancy due to an extra sideband. Got a public library nearby?
Need a
reference?


I see you are ignoring compression again.

We all no the truth now. Your SSB signal has no compression, therefore
you sound like a mouse. No wonder no one pays any attention to what
you say.

COMPRESSION HAS NOTHING TO DO WITH IT, YOU IMBECILE!!!
No audio = no RF = quiescient power drain! Good God, man, don't you have
ANY
reference handy? An ARRL handbook maybe? If you have an SSB amp that is
50%
efficient and you input a single-tone audio sine wave for an output of 100
watts, what's the power input? 200 watts + quiescient power. For an output
of
200 watts the input is 400 watts + quiescient power. Are you getting it?
Or do I
need to draw you a picture for when you aren't stoned?






=============

"...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM
have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and
are both too small to admit it."
---- Twistedhed ----

=============


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----