| Page 1 of 2 | 1 | 2 |
|
|
WA3MOJ- aka-Robert The Bruce wrote:
I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. I'm only using that call while I'm addressing you, George. .. .. .. .. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Article poste via Voila News - http://www.news.voila.fr Le : Wed Jan 7 05:28:43 2004 depuis l'IP : ac8ce3d4.ipt.aol.com [VIP 532284301978] |
"Robert The Bruce" wrote in message ... X-Apparently-To: via web 14301.mail.yahoo.com; 5 January 2004 Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com (152.163.225.102) by mta410.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 January 2004 12:31:43 -0700 (EDT) Received: from by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.f2.f8f5579 (4241) for ; 5 January 2004 15:31:31 -0400 (EDT) From: ÊÊ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:31:31 EDT Subject: Who Is Forging WA3MOJ To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_f2.f8f5579.28d50693 _boundary" X-Mailer: Windows US sub 10539 Content-Length: 194 hey dumb ass, ever thought the one who is forging wa3moj is randy? i guess not. I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. LMAO!!!! No, I got email the other day from him wishing me a Happy New Year, not even close to his email addy. GHheeez, George you just can't seem to deflect any of that attention away, can you. Landshark |
On 7 Jan 2004 04:28:43 GMT, Robert The Bruce
wrote: X-Apparently-To: via web 14301.mail.yahoo.com; 5 January 2004 Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com (152.163.225.102) by mta410.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 January 2004 12:31:43 -0700 (EDT) Received: from by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.f2.f8f5579 (4241) for ; 5 January 2004 15:31:31 -0400 (EDT) From: ÊÊ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:31:31 EDT Subject: Who Is Forging WA3MOJ To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_f2.f8f5579.28d50693 _boundary" X-Mailer: Windows US sub 10539 Content-Length: 194 hey dumb ass, ever thought the one who is forging wa3moj is randy? i guess not. I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. tim Now your trying to say that the No Fear post where he ended it with his call sign was a forgery? He already admitted he posted it, he just copied and pasted wrong. LOL, you are just to damn funny, you guys need a script so you can get your stories straight. |
On 07 Jan 2004 04:35:21 GMT, Steveo
wrote: WA3MOJ- aka-Robert The Bruce wrote: I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. I'm only using that call while I'm addressing you, George. . Funny, he's the only one that answers to that call.. |
Lancer wrote:
On 07 Jan 2004 04:35:21 GMT, Steveo wrote: WA3MOJ- aka-Robert The Bruce wrote: I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. I'm only using that call while I'm addressing you, George. . Funny, he's the only one that answers to that call.. I heard him on the nickle yesterday, he's a ratchet-jaw. -- I'll bring you precious contraband And ancient tales from distant lands. -Steve Earle- |
On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 07:49:31 -0600, Duke Of Windsor
wrote: Lancer wrote in : Landshark is squirming all over google looking for evidance ....roflmao lololololo what a hoot. sure are impotent this bunch. He has already shown his evidence that you posted. Doesn't take much looking on google to find it. |
"Lancer" wrote in message ... On Wed, 07 Jan 2004 07:49:31 -0600, Duke Of Windsor wrote: Lancer wrote in : Landshark is squirming all over google looking for evidance ....roflmao lololololo what a hoot. sure are impotent this bunch. He has already shown his evidence that you posted. Doesn't take much looking on google to find it. Kind of like this one: http://www.google.com/groups?q=autho...num=5&filter=0 Or this one: http://www.google.com/groups?q=autho...num=2&filter=0 Not to much trouble at all really. Landshark -- Real heroes are men who fall and fail and are flawed, but win out in the end because they've stayed true to their ideals and beliefs and commitments. |
In , Lancer
wrote: On 7 Jan 2004 04:28:43 GMT, Robert The Bruce wrote: X-Apparently-To: via web 14301.mail.yahoo.com; 5 January 2004 Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com (152.163.225.102) by mta410.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 January 2004 12:31:43 -0700 (EDT) Received: from by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.f2.f8f5579 (4241) for ; 5 January 2004 15:31:31 -0400 (EDT) From: ÊÊ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:31:31 EDT Subject: Who Is Forging WA3MOJ To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_f2.f8f5579.28d50693 _boundary" X-Mailer: Windows US sub 10539 Content-Length: 194 hey dumb ass, ever thought the one who is forging wa3moj is randy? i guess not. I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. tim Now your trying to say that the No Fear post where he ended it with his call sign was a forgery? He already admitted he posted it, he just copied and pasted wrong. I would agree if not for one thing -- there are no posts by anyone in any newsgroup posted prior to the one in question that contains WA3MOJ. Remember that all of this WA3MOJ stuff is based on two assumptions: that the callsign was a signature, and that it was put there accidentally. If it was a signature, and it was accidently copied and pasted from another newsgroup post, where's that post? If not from a newsgroup post, then from what document was it copied? And in the originating document, was the callsign written in the first, second or third person (from him, to him, or about him)? It may not have been a signature at all. In fact..... Nobody has stopped to think of any other possibility. For example, if I didn't like someone in my neighborhood, it would have been real easy for me to suggest I was that person, knowing that he, not me, would be the target of harassment. And the more "george" denies he is WA3MOJ, the more everyone is convinced that he is lying, which may be exactly what he intends. So it may be very possible that he is laughing it up while playing all of you like puppets. Just something to think about. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Lancer wrote: On 7 Jan 2004 04:28:43 GMT, Robert The Bruce wrote: X-Apparently-To: via web 14301.mail.yahoo.com; 5 January 2004 Received: from imo-r06.mx.aol.com (152.163.225.102) by mta410.mail.yahoo.com with SMTP; 5 January 2004 12:31:43 -0700 (EDT) Received: from by imo-r06.mx.aol.com (mail_out_v31_r1.7.) id r.f2.f8f5579 (4241) for ; 5 January 2004 15:31:31 -0400 (EDT) From: ÊÊ Message-ID: Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 15:31:31 EDT Subject: Who Is Forging WA3MOJ To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="part1_f2.f8f5579.28d50693 _boundary" X-Mailer: Windows US sub 10539 Content-Length: 194 hey dumb ass, ever thought the one who is forging wa3moj is randy? i guess not. I know for a fact that he and morpharholic are posting that callsign around. tim Now your trying to say that the No Fear post where he ended it with his call sign was a forgery? He already admitted he posted it, he just copied and pasted wrong. I would agree if not for one thing -- there are no posts by anyone in any newsgroup posted prior to the one in question that contains WA3MOJ. Remember that all of this WA3MOJ stuff is based on two assumptions: that the callsign was a signature, and that it was put there accidentally. If it was a signature, and it was accidently copied and pasted from another newsgroup post, where's that post? If not from a newsgroup post, then from what document was it copied? And in the originating document, was the callsign written in the first, second or third person (from him, to him, or about him)? It may not have been a signature at all. In fact..... Nobody has stopped to think of any other possibility. For example, if I didn't like someone in my neighborhood, it would have been real easy for me to suggest I was that person, knowing that he, not me, would be the target of harassment. And the more "george" denies he is WA3MOJ, the more everyone is convinced that he is lying, which may be exactly what he intends. So it may be very possible that he is laughing it up while playing all of you like puppets. Just something to think about. Another theory I spose', except the fact that he jumps thru hoops whenever someone says anything about WA3MOJ. Whatever the case may be, he only posts flames about CBer's so when the rock drops, he has it coming. How'd you make out with your visit? -- I was born my papa's son A wanderin' eye and a smokin' gun. Steve Earle |
| All times are GMT +1. The time now is 08:39 AM. |
|
Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com