RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)
-   -   Where will you CW'rs go when the NO-CODERS arrive? (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/30996-where-will-you-cwrs-go-when-no-coders-arrive.html)

Old School February 1st 04 03:47 AM

Where will you CW'rs go when the NO-CODERS arrive?
 
Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!

JOE February 1st 04 03:57 AM

Troll



S-Man February 1st 04 05:36 AM

Where will we go?

We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the
phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-)

Steve w8an

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!



Old School February 1st 04 05:42 AM

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:36:29 -0500, S-Man
wrote:

Where will we go?

We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the
phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-)

Steve w8an

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!



Charles Brabham February 1st 04 12:52 PM


"Old School" wrote in message
...

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?


Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very
clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for
them.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL



WA3MOJ February 1st 04 01:07 PM

In article m, Charles Brabham
says...


"Old School" wrote in message
.. .

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?


Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very
clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for
them.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


Did you take the dumded down test moron? Its assholes like you who ruin the
hobby.

I'm an idiot


WA3MOJ February 1st 04 01:13 PM

In article , Old School says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:36:29 -0500, S-Man
wrote:

Where will we go?

We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the
phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-)

Steve w8an

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


You CBplusers suck. Stick to your walkie talkie thar good buddy.

I'm an idiot


WA3MOJ February 1st 04 01:15 PM

Those no coders can go to hell as far as Im concerned!

In article , S-Man says...

Where will we go?

We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the
phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-)

Steve w8an

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!



I'm an idiot


WA3MOJ February 1st 04 01:23 PM

Ill just run CW over the no code *******s.

In article , Old School says...

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


I'm an idiot


mdd February 1st 04 02:21 PM

You will just be busted for malicious intentional interference.
"WA3MOJ" wrote in message
...
Ill just run CW over the no code *******s.

In article , Old School

says...

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


I'm an idiot




WA3MOJ February 1st 04 02:23 PM

Not if I don't ID.

In article , mdd says...

You will just be busted for malicious intentional interference.
"WA3MOJ" wrote in message
...
Ill just run CW over the no code *******s.

In article , Old School

says...

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


I'm an idiot





Helmut February 1st 04 04:53 PM

Dear Mr. George Bush,

"WA3MOJ" schrieb im Newsbeitrag
...
Ill just run CW over the no code *******s.


How are you going to determin, if someone did take the CW-test to get the
licence?
Doing like you announced will be a violation of the international Amateur
Radio Rules.
Are you going to make no more QSO with hams outside US? Are you going to
make QSO only with hams they gave you proof of their CW-examination?
Even from today on, you never can tell, if somone one the HF Bands did take
the CW-Test. HF is not only for american hams. The majority of the entire
ham radio world voted to drop the CW-requirement for getting access to
frequencies below 30MHz at the WRC 2003 at Genever, and the american
communications commission did as well.

I've got my license in 1990, and had to go the full way, 60 signs per
minute, the standart in Europe. Now it is allowed to get the same licence
called CEPT without CW-test. Nobody over here in Europe is angry against
them who will get the ability to work on the HF-bands now. We welcome them
and will help them to get used to the new spectrum.

What will you do, if you meet one of those GB, PA, HB9, OE, DL, VK and so
on, just to name a few, on the portion of the band, which you call
EXTRA-allocation-subband?

Please specify, and give a full answer.

Thank you, Mr. George Bush, WA3MOJ

73 de OE8SOQ
Helmut



Old School February 1st 04 05:24 PM

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:52:16 GMT, "Charles Brabham"
wrote:


"Old School" wrote in message
.. .

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?


Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very
clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for
them.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL

In what way? I cant be anti ham if I am one! Code or not!

kf6foz

Old School February 1st 04 05:27 PM

WA3MOJ wrote in :

Not if I don't ID.


Doesnt matter.

Old School February 1st 04 05:47 PM

On 1 Feb 2004 05:15:02 -0800, WA3MOJ wrote:

Those no coders can go to hell as far as Im concerned!


But we won't be. We will be going to HF. :P

Old School February 1st 04 05:49 PM

On 1 Feb 2004 05:13:48 -0800, WA3MOJ wrote:

In article , Old School says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:36:29 -0500, S-Man
wrote:

Where will we go?

We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the
phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong. ;-)

Steve w8an

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


You CBplusers suck. Stick to your walkie talkie thar good buddy.


Stick to your keyer you hemoroid

Old School February 1st 04 09:12 PM

On 01 Feb 2004 20:51:20 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:

I guess you are just a plain and simple IDIOT!!!


No Im not familiar with CB Terms


This guy is a total moron. I just dont see him even knowing 1 wpm CW.
You prove yourself to be a total jackass and your knowledge makes you
as dumb as a box of rocks

Old School February 1st 04 09:13 PM

On 01 Feb 2004 20:52:27 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:

Whatever, dummy!


Whatever, at least you should have some Idea about what you are talking about.


I cant talk to a stupid idiot with no grade level. If you cant
comprehend, then go away.


Dan/W4NTI February 1st 04 09:14 PM


"Old School" wrote in message
...
Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


I won't be going anywhere. I'll still be operating CW in all the normal
places.

As for the ARRL. I will be staying with them also. There is a much better
chance of changing them from within, then from without.

Dan/W4NTI



Dan/W4NTI February 1st 04 09:14 PM

Of course it is.

Dan/W4NTI

"JOE" wrote in message
...
Troll





Old School February 1st 04 09:15 PM

On 01 Feb 2004 20:53:42 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:

Again, what I said above!


And as usual you have no Idea what your talking about


And again as usual you look like a total idiot. What is your problem?
Am I speaking to Advanced for you to understand? Its called English!
If you dont understand, go back to school. You need to learn how to
comprehend and understand english like you say you can CW.


Helmut February 1st 04 09:57 PM


"Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this mindspring.com schrieb im Newsbeitrag
nk.net...

I won't be going anywhere. I'll still be operating CW in all the normal
places.


Will you please start on the important spots like 3984,5 and 3696 and 14275
and 21430 and so on, you shurely know the spots you're hanging around. This
will do much good to the "normal" ham world.

OE8SOQ
Helmut




Old School February 1st 04 10:11 PM

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:16:57 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote:


"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


Why you limp wristed Cber, look the "CBRRL" came out in your favor, so

dont be
so tight send in your MONEY.


They ain't gonna come off that 40 bucks.

I have decided to stay in Bruce. I'm going to do what I can to get rid of
these goofs that voted for this crap....from the INSIDE.

Dan/W4NTI

Most of those so called goofs as you called them are the ticket
holders like yourself, but with an open mind. You and what army are
gonna get rid of them? You and Bruce? Bah, Have fun trying.


Old School February 1st 04 10:12 PM

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:14:04 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote:


"Old School" wrote in message
.. .
Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


I won't be going anywhere. I'll still be operating CW in all the normal
places.

As for the ARRL. I will be staying with them also. There is a much better
chance of changing them from within, then from without.

Dan/W4NTI

Thanks for the tip.


Old School February 2nd 04 01:49 AM

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 18:06:05 -0500, Lou wrote:

On 01 Feb 2004 23:04:34 GMT, (WA8ULX) wrote:

I wonder how confused his contacts have gotten
on the receiving end of CW.



There not confused at all


Who's "there"? You mean They're.


My point exactly!!!

Bob McConnell February 2nd 04 04:03 AM

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:52:16 GMT, "Charles Brabham"
wrote:


"Old School" wrote in message
.. .

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?


Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very
clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for
them.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


Come on Charles, he's not nearly as rude as you have been with your
anti-Internet rants. He's just asking a simple question that I would
like to hear your answer for.

Bob McConnell
N2SPP


Old School February 2nd 04 04:14 AM

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 04:03:56 GMT, Bob McConnell
wrote:

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 12:52:16 GMT, "Charles Brabham"
wrote:


"Old School" wrote in message
. ..

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?


Your rude, ignorant, anti-ham attitude here illustrates the "problem" very
clearly and concisely. You have just made the opposition's arguement for
them.

Charles Brabham, N5PVL


Come on Charles, he's not nearly as rude as you have been with your
anti-Internet rants. He's just asking a simple question that I would
like to hear your answer for.

Bob McConnell
N2SPP


You are a bad guy now too Bob just for replying. But that is all I
asked for was a simple answer. It seems Dan, Bruce and Charles want to
avoid a serious answer by doing the run-around.

kf6foz

Herman Tibbs February 2nd 04 02:24 PM

Ok, at the time I am a no-code tech but I am working on getting my CW so I
can advance to General. I would prefer to go the "Old School" route as the
people who got me into it also did. I think my 12 year old son is even
challenging me on the CW. If I get it and my general, he goes and gets his
tech. I got news for him. He'd better get ready for the CW cause when I
take it, I am also going to take the Extra class in the same session so he
had better get ready to go General pretty quick (laughing).

On the other hand, I think that it is good that they are trying to make
the hobby more attractive so that more might get into it.

As a result, I do think that more "self-policing" should be practiced as
in every crowd, you have a bad element.

Feel free to e-mail any comments about this posting to me.

73
KC8VJD

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!



Old School February 2nd 04 05:43 PM

I applaud you for wanting to do it the old school way. Nothing wrong
with that. I want to as well, but time doesnt allow that for me unless
I get time soon.

73
kf6foz

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:24:22 GMT, Herman Tibbs
wrote:

Ok, at the time I am a no-code tech but I am working on getting my CW so I
can advance to General. I would prefer to go the "Old School" route as the
people who got me into it also did. I think my 12 year old son is even
challenging me on the CW. If I get it and my general, he goes and gets his
tech. I got news for him. He'd better get ready for the CW cause when I
take it, I am also going to take the Extra class in the same session so he
had better get ready to go General pretty quick (laughing).

On the other hand, I think that it is good that they are trying to make
the hobby more attractive so that more might get into it.

As a result, I do think that more "self-policing" should be practiced as
in every crowd, you have a bad element.

Feel free to e-mail any comments about this posting to me.

73
KC8VJD

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!



Old School February 2nd 04 06:33 PM

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 14:24:22 GMT, Herman Tibbs
wrote:

Ok, at the time I am a no-code tech but I am working on getting my CW so I
can advance to General. I would prefer to go the "Old School" route as the
people who got me into it also did. I think my 12 year old son is even
challenging me on the CW. If I get it and my general, he goes and gets his
tech. I got news for him. He'd better get ready for the CW cause when I
take it, I am also going to take the Extra class in the same session so he
had better get ready to go General pretty quick (laughing).

On the other hand, I think that it is good that they are trying to make
the hobby more attractive so that more might get into it.

As a result, I do think that more "self-policing" should be practiced as
in every crowd, you have a bad element.

Feel free to e-mail any comments about this posting to me.

73
KC8VJD

I too would like the Old School approach, hence my name here. There
isnt much for VE testing in my area and it conflicts with my schedule
when one is in town. Therefore I have to work while I wait for the
oppertunity to get the time. Thats good you have someone to work with
as well. Not much here locally in the means of Amateurs on any band HF
or VHF/UHF. I wish you and your son luck on the tests.

It is a well known fact that there is at least one other amateur in
the area of an offending user. All it takes is some effort to protect
it. It isnt that hard to report someone. I dont like being called a
knarc, but damnit if someone is going to risk me losing my priviliges
for there actions.

Old School February 3rd 04 12:08 AM

On Mon, 02 Feb 2004 23:44:54 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote:


"Old School" wrote in message
.. .
On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 21:16:57 GMT, "Dan/W4NTI" w4nti@get rid of this
mindspring.com wrote:


"WA8ULX" wrote in message
...
If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!


Why you limp wristed Cber, look the "CBRRL" came out in your favor, so
dont be
so tight send in your MONEY.

They ain't gonna come off that 40 bucks.

I have decided to stay in Bruce. I'm going to do what I can to get rid

of
these goofs that voted for this crap....from the INSIDE.

Dan/W4NTI

Most of those so called goofs as you called them are the ticket
holders like yourself, but with an open mind. You and what army are
gonna get rid of them? You and Bruce? Bah, Have fun trying.

Don't need an Army newguy. Just some dedication. See you in the trenches.

And why are you sending this to the CB group?

Dan/W4NTI

The cb group needs a change. A change for the better. They may be able
to learn something from us. If you dislike, I will halt.

IMKen February 3rd 04 03:53 AM

You are a perfect example of the class of people that will be found on a
No-Code Ham band. Jerks and Jerk off that are interested in instant
gratification. No class like CB'ers




"Old School" wrote in message
...
On 1 Feb 2004 05:13:48 -0800, WA3MOJ wrote:

In article , Old School

says...

On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 00:36:29 -0500, S-Man
wrote:

Where will we go?

We'll still be able to run code where we do now, and will. If the
phonies don't like it, they can move down the band where they belong.

;-)

Steve w8an

Thats what Im getting at. If everyone stays where they should be, then
what is the problem?

Old School wrote:

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and

no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes

a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the

ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!

You CBplusers suck. Stick to your walkie talkie thar good buddy.


Stick to your keyer you hemoroid




Dee D. Flint February 3rd 04 03:54 AM


"Old School" wrote in message
...
I applaud you for wanting to do it the old school way. Nothing wrong
with that. I want to as well, but time doesnt allow that for me unless
I get time soon.



Odds are it will take the FCC about 2 years to make any changes (if they
make any changes). If you practice 30 minutes per day using the free G4FON
software, you should be ready to take the code test in about 2 months.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE


Jerome M. Kutche February 15th 04 11:41 PM

What a bunch of children.... Get a life....



"WA3MOJ" wrote in message
...
Not if I don't ID.

In article , mdd says...

You will just be busted for malicious intentional interference.
"WA3MOJ" wrote in message
...
Ill just run CW over the no code *******s.

In article , Old School

says...

Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!

I'm an idiot







Mitch Dickson February 29th 04 04:04 PM

Well I for one have a set of WARC, W5YI, and ARRL VEC badges for sale. I
certainly will not put my signature on your No-code HF license son!!!!

Where will I go now? Well I thought about bailing out altogether. I sold
all my radio equipment and for about a year now, I went silent. But I
decided to get back to my roots and I started designing and building a few
QRP rigs and even a 50 watt kicker! I have now "RE-DONE" my shack with
something you will never be able to do son, homemade equipment! Only thing
in it that is "storebought" is my 1931 key :)

Oh you can screw up the bands for a while and just like CB drive everyone
nuts, but the new will wear off and there will be a glut of HF gear on the
market in a few years. Those who put nothing in will soon get bored and
bail out.

You will find me where you cannot go! I will be that faint, almost
imperceptible little sound way back there in the back, talking across the
globe on 1 watt on my homebrew antennas and transmitters :) There will be
no nocoders in my world son :) I have the ability to design a good enough
RIT and crystal filter to tune you right out LMAO!

And when you have a question or your radio breaks or something doesn't work,
I will be the one who charges you an arm and a leg to fix it ROTFLMAO! And
when you get ready to work "groundwave", I will be glad to tell you how deep
you have to bury your antenna :) You think having enough money to buy a
radio makes you a ham? LOL, nothing could be farther from the truth.

Mitch
AE4YW

--
"Come by and sit a spell with me at www.volstate.net/~mitch/ "


"Old School" wrote in message
...
Where will you Pro-Coders go now? I have a feeling that all you
against NO-CODE HF will like the new move. You may not like it now,
but you will. If not, will you give up on Amateur Radio like several
have stated they resigned there ARRL commission? There is no proof
that anyone has resigned there ARRL Membership! Was it all talk and no
action? You Pro-Coders are full of it and you know it. If it becomes a
reality, I will be one of many who will get a membership with the ARRL
to take the place of the grumpy old men. 55 years of age and older as
the ARRL reported, so good bye!!!




Beej Jorgensen February 29th 04 04:58 PM

In article ,
Mitch Dickson wrote:
You think having enough money to buy a radio makes you a ham? LOL,
nothing could be farther from the truth.


There are two types of people in this world, my friend: those who agree
with you, and those who just don't care.

-Beej


Salty Dog February 29th 04 08:31 PM

This is the dang truth. read it and weep steveo....


Oh you can screw up the bands for a while and just like CB drive everyo

ne
nuts, but the new will wear off and there will be a glut of HF gear on

the
market in a few years. Those who put nothing in will soon get bored an

d
bail out.

You will find me where you cannot go! I will be that faint, almost
imperceptible little sound way back there in the back, talking across t

he
globe on 1 watt on my homebrew antennas and transmitters :) There will

be
no nocoders in my world son :) I have the ability to design a good eno

ugh
RIT and crystal filter to tune you right out LMAO!












=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Article poste via Voila News - http://www.news.voila.fr
Le : Sun Feb 29 21:31:45 2004 depuis l'IP : ac8917cb.ipt.aol.com [VIP 532284301978]

Lancer February 29th 04 09:35 PM

On Sun, 29 Feb 2004 11:04:11 -0500, "Mitch Dickson"
wrote:

Well I for one have a set of WARC, W5YI, and ARRL VEC badges for sale. I
certainly will not put my signature on your No-code HF license son!!!!

Where will I go now? Well I thought about bailing out altogether. I sold
all my radio equipment and for about a year now, I went silent. But I
decided to get back to my roots and I started designing and building a few
QRP rigs and even a 50 watt kicker! I have now "RE-DONE" my shack with
something you will never be able to do son, homemade equipment! Only thing
in it that is "storebought" is my 1931 key :)

Oh you can screw up the bands for a while and just like CB drive everyone
nuts, but the new will wear off and there will be a glut of HF gear on the
market in a few years. Those who put nothing in will soon get bored and
bail out.

You will find me where you cannot go! I will be that faint, almost
imperceptible little sound way back there in the back, talking across the
globe on 1 watt on my homebrew antennas and transmitters :) There will be
no nocoders in my world son :) I have the ability to design a good enough
RIT and crystal filter to tune you right out LMAO!


Design a good enough RIT? Sounds like you don't even know what one
is.

Steveo February 29th 04 09:46 PM

Salty Dog wrote:
This is the dang truth. read it and weep steveo....

That means you, crybaby.

There will
be
no nocoders in my world son :)


--
Mopar http://www.allpar.com/mopar.html

Doug Birky March 29th 04 05:04 AM

I agree totally. I am really looking foreword to getting my general. I
don't mind the work of learning CW. I have both the G4FON and CodeQuick. I
highly recommend the G4FON. I do use the CodeQuick if I find myself getting
stuck or mixing up close or opposite sounds. I think that code should be
required for the HF licenses. At 5WPM the people that really want it will
work for it. If the ARRL does get the license changed so no-code gets some
HF privileges, so be it. As long as folks stay where they belong in the
band, things should still go ok. Its those select few that can screw it up.
If you don't want to learn code, fine. But stay where you belong. As for me,
it will be fun to know the code. I have a nephew that is wanting to learn it
is well. He is currently studying for his tech license and will be joining
me soon after that when he learns the code as well. This is a fun hobby.
Its great to meet the people, talk to the older folks who started this out,
and talk to others just getting into it as I am. Please don't wreck it for
us newbies.
73
Doug / KC8YEC

Dee D. Flint wrote in message
gy.com...

"Old School" wrote in message
...
I applaud you for wanting to do it the old school way. Nothing wrong
with that. I want to as well, but time doesnt allow that for me unless
I get time soon.



Odds are it will take the FCC about 2 years to make any changes (if they
make any changes). If you practice 30 minutes per day using the free

G4FON
software, you should be ready to take the code test in about 2 months.

Dee D. Flint, N8UZE





All times are GMT +1. The time now is 07:57 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com