RadioBanter

RadioBanter (https://www.radiobanter.com/)
-   CB (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/)
-   -   Base Antenna Mounting (https://www.radiobanter.com/cb/31055-base-antenna-mounting.html)

Frank Gilliland February 18th 04 09:46 PM

In ,
(Twistedhed) begged for attention by writing:


Freedom is participation in power - Cicero



Twisty, it's obvious that you Kant comprehend freedom at all.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

I Am Not God February 18th 04 10:16 PM


"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message

...
From:
(I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog


poop?



Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:

(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.


Shut up, George.



Keith Hosman February 18th 04 11:30 PM

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:33:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:



Ok......

First, sink a ground rod at the point where the coax will enter the house. If
you have a basement next to the ground rod, sink a couple more rods so they are
separated by ten feet or more and in the path of the coax. Some people like to
prep the ground by soaking with sal****er, but in my experience that makes the
rod corrode before its time, then the salt leeches away into the ground water,
leaving a very poor ground in a very short time. I use galvanized pipe as
opposed to copper rods because they have a larger diameter (more rod-to-ground
contact = lower resistance), and they last longer. You can also thread the pipe
for a super-neat installation of a waterproof box......

Next is the coax installation. Run the coax down the mast or side of the house
to the ground rod. Don't run the coax near any wiring inside the house. You can
detect house wiring with a cheap metal detector. Avoid sharp turns as much as
possible. At the ground rod it helps to have a waterproof box because you need
to cut the coax, ground the shield, and shunt the center conductor to ground
with a choke (as per the diagram I made yesterday).

About the choke: This serves two purposes. First, it shunts static electricity
from the antenna to ground. Second, it provides a path for lightning if it
should strike. Since the lightning will arc across every loop in the choke, the
inductance value isn't critical just as long as it is high enough to block your
RF (about 1 mH or larger for HF and above), and the wire size is large enough to
handle some current (#14 or larger should be fine). One of those heavy-duty hash
chokes for ignition noise is ok, or you can wind your own -- use a large iron
bolt for a core and wind about 50 turns of #10 or #12 house wire. If you aren't
running much power, you can slit the insulation along the length of the coil so
it will arc at a lower voltage.

Then run the coax up into the house along side the grounding strap. Tie them
together with cable-ties if you want. Again, it's important that you run these
so they don't come close to any house wiring, and they should enter at a
location that is clear of easily combustible stuff. Terminate the ground strap
with a really big alligator clip, jumper cable clamp, or whatever you have that
makes a really good connection and can be easily disconnected. The ground clamp
from an arc welder is almost ideal.

Above the point where the coax and grounding strap enter the house, make a hook
or post where you can hang both when not being used. Remember that if lightning
hits, it's very possible that these will jump straight out from the wall and
dance around like a water hose, so make sure they are held securely in place.

Inside the house, make yourself a grounding bus bar of copper or aluminum. Put
this on the back of your bench and use it to ground all your equipment. To this
you clamp on your grounding strap. When not using your bench, unhook the
grounding strap along with the coax and stow it away. Also, to protect the coax,
use an appropriate socket and short it out before you stow it.

When should you unhook your antenna? There is a thing called the 30-30 rule: If
you hear thunder less than 30 seconds after you see the lightning, unplug. Don't
plug in again until 30 minutes after the last thunder. That's pretty safe. You
can even improve on that by building a lightning detector, many of which will
indicate lightning even before you can hear the thunder.


How's that?

Oh, I almost forgot..... coax length!!!!! The low impedance of the ground will
be reflected at the radio when the length of the coax & ground strap, from the
ground rod to the radio, are 1/2 wavelength. This means 1/2 wavelength -without-
consideration of velocity factor because we want a low impedance -ground-. And
this means -- you guessed it -- 18 feet of coax!




My previous dwelling besides having a similar setup to what Frank
described I also had my antenna and tower grounded. I put my tower out
in the old garden bed (I moved my garden every few years so as to give
nutrients a chance to rebuild), and before I put fill dirt and grass
seed in I laid out a grid of #12 copper wire in a 18' radius from the
tower legs, this as well as the tower and antenna were tied into a
ground rod at the base of the tower. I had a weatherproof box outside
where I could disconnect coax so it couldn't feed into house during
t-storm.

I'll be setting similar situation up here at the new place, this time
for my HF Vertical, my UHF/VHF antennas, and my multi-band Inverted V.

73 de Keith
--
KC8TCQ
ARRL Member - ARES
SKYWARN

I Am Not George February 19th 04 12:03 AM

"I Am Not God" wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
From:
(I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically

against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than

from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:

(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.


Shut up, George.


Randy you don't even know who the **** your talking to so STFU things
were fine here Steveo took a rest and so did landfag and what do you
know we had some cb topics for a change. Then Twisted****forbrains
decided to troll Dave Hall and cause trouble. Now you run in to go to
bat for Twisty? Go back to the pipe asspuppet

I Am Not God February 19th 04 12:04 AM


"Keith Hosman" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:33:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:



Ok......

First, sink a ground rod at the point where the coax will enter the

house. If
you have a basement next to the ground rod, sink a couple more rods so

they are
separated by ten feet or more and in the path of the coax. Some people

like to
prep the ground by soaking with sal****er, but in my experience that

makes the
rod corrode before its time, then the salt leeches away into the ground

water,
leaving a very poor ground in a very short time. I use galvanized pipe as
opposed to copper rods because they have a larger diameter (more

rod-to-ground
contact = lower resistance), and they last longer. You can also thread

the pipe
for a super-neat installation of a waterproof box......

Next is the coax installation. Run the coax down the mast or side of the

house
to the ground rod. Don't run the coax near any wiring inside the house.

You can
detect house wiring with a cheap metal detector. Avoid sharp turns as

much as
possible. At the ground rod it helps to have a waterproof box because you

need
to cut the coax, ground the shield, and shunt the center conductor to

ground
with a choke (as per the diagram I made yesterday).

About the choke: This serves two purposes. First, it shunts static

electricity
from the antenna to ground. Second, it provides a path for lightning if

it
should strike. Since the lightning will arc across every loop in the

choke, the
inductance value isn't critical just as long as it is high enough to

block your
RF (about 1 mH or larger for HF and above), and the wire size is large

enough to
handle some current (#14 or larger should be fine). One of those

heavy-duty hash
chokes for ignition noise is ok, or you can wind your own -- use a large

iron
bolt for a core and wind about 50 turns of #10 or #12 house wire. If you

aren't
running much power, you can slit the insulation along the length of the

coil so
it will arc at a lower voltage.

Then run the coax up into the house along side the grounding strap. Tie

them
together with cable-ties if you want. Again, it's important that you run

these
so they don't come close to any house wiring, and they should enter at a
location that is clear of easily combustible stuff. Terminate the ground

strap
with a really big alligator clip, jumper cable clamp, or whatever you

have that
makes a really good connection and can be easily disconnected. The ground

clamp
from an arc welder is almost ideal.

Above the point where the coax and grounding strap enter the house, make

a hook
or post where you can hang both when not being used. Remember that if

lightning
hits, it's very possible that these will jump straight out from the wall

and
dance around like a water hose, so make sure they are held securely in

place.

Inside the house, make yourself a grounding bus bar of copper or

aluminum. Put
this on the back of your bench and use it to ground all your equipment.

To this
you clamp on your grounding strap. When not using your bench, unhook the
grounding strap along with the coax and stow it away. Also, to protect

the coax,
use an appropriate socket and short it out before you stow it.

When should you unhook your antenna? There is a thing called the 30-30

rule: If
you hear thunder less than 30 seconds after you see the lightning,

unplug. Don't
plug in again until 30 minutes after the last thunder. That's pretty

safe. You
can even improve on that by building a lightning detector, many of which

will
indicate lightning even before you can hear the thunder.


How's that?

Oh, I almost forgot..... coax length!!!!! The low impedance of the ground

will
be reflected at the radio when the length of the coax & ground strap,

from the
ground rod to the radio, are 1/2 wavelength. This means 1/2

wavelength -without-
consideration of velocity factor because we want a low

impedance -ground-. And
this means -- you guessed it -- 18 feet of coax!




My previous dwelling besides having a similar setup to what Frank
described I also had my antenna and tower grounded. I put my tower out
in the old garden bed (I moved my garden every few years so as to give
nutrients a chance to rebuild), and before I put fill dirt and grass
seed in I laid out a grid of #12 copper wire in a 18' radius from the
tower legs, this as well as the tower and antenna were tied into a
ground rod at the base of the tower. I had a weatherproof box outside
where I could disconnect coax so it couldn't feed into house during
t-storm.

I'll be setting similar situation up here at the new place, this time
for my HF Vertical, my UHF/VHF antennas, and my multi-band Inverted V.

73 de Keith
--
KC8TCQ
ARRL Member - ARES
SKYWARN


Don't forget to ground your tomato plants. g



I Am Not God February 19th 04 12:08 AM


"I Am Not George" wrote in message
m...
"I Am Not God" wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
From:
(I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically

against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than

from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.


Shut up, George.


Randy you don't even know who the **** your talking to so STFU things
were fine here Steveo took a rest and so did landfag and what do you
know we had some cb topics for a change. Then Twisted****forbrains
decided to troll Dave Hall and cause trouble. Now you run in to go to
bat for Twisty? Go back to the pipe asspuppet


Don't do that. But, I do have friends that grow shrooms. I think you need
some to get your head back on straight, George.



Steveo February 19th 04 12:12 AM

(I Am Not George) wrote:
"I Am Not God"
wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
From:
(I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically

against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than

from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.


Shut up, George.


Randy you don't even know who the **** your talking to so STFU things
were fine here Steveo took a rest

I'm not resting, I put you and staintard back in your place.


_ _ _
| | _____ _ _ ___| | _____ ___ __ ____ _ __ _ _| | ___
| |/ / _ \ | | |/ __| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / '_ \|_ / | '__| | | | |/ _ \
| __/ |_| | (__| | (_) \ V V /| | | |/ / | | | |_| | | __/
|_|\_\___|\__, |\___|_|\___/ \_/\_/ |_| |_/___| |_| \__,_|_|\___|

|___/

--
Go 40 42 12

Landshark February 19th 04 02:55 AM


"Steveo" wrote in message
...
(I Am Not George) wrote:
"I Am Not God"
wrote:
"I Am Not George" wrote in message
om...
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
From:
(I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically

against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than

from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.

Shut up, George.


Randy you don't even know who the **** your talking to so STFU things
were fine here Steveo took a rest

I'm not resting, I put you and staintard back in your place.


_ _ _
| | _____ _ _ ___| | _____ ___ __ ____ _ __ _ _| | ___
| |/ / _ \ | | |/ __| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / '_ \|_ / | '__| | | | |/ _ \
| __/ |_| | (__| | (_) \ V V /| | | |/ / | | | |_| | | __/
|_|\_\___|\__, |\___|_|\___/ \_/\_/ |_| |_/___| |_| \__,_|_|\___|

|___/



LMAO!!! Like that blow hard has anything to do
with what we post or do........................ A one troll
that George Busch wa3moj is.

Landshark



I Am Not George February 19th 04 03:33 AM

"Steveo" wrote in message
...

| | _____ _ _ ___| | _____ ___ __ ____ _ __ _ _| | ___
| |/ / _ \ | | |/ __| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / '_ \|_ / | '__| | | | |/ _ \
| __/ |_| | (__| | (_) \ V V /| | | |/ / | | | |_| | | __/
|_|\_\___|\__, |\___|_|\___/ \_/\_/ |_| |_/___| |_| \__,_|_|\___|


Whats that supposed to be the scratches on your dick from landfags teeth

Keith Hosman February 19th 04 04:01 AM

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 00:04:13 GMT, "I Am Not God"
wrote:


"Keith Hosman" wrote in
message ...
On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 19:33:27 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:




My previous dwelling besides having a similar setup to what Frank
described I also had my antenna and tower grounded. I put my tower out
in the old garden bed (I moved my garden every few years so as to give
nutrients a chance to rebuild), and before I put fill dirt and grass
seed in I laid out a grid of #12 copper wire in a 18' radius from the
tower legs, this as well as the tower and antenna were tied into a
ground rod at the base of the tower. I had a weatherproof box outside
where I could disconnect coax so it couldn't feed into house during
t-storm.

I'll be setting similar situation up here at the new place, this time
for my HF Vertical, my UHF/VHF antennas, and my multi-band Inverted V.

73 de Keith
--
KC8TCQ
ARRL Member - ARES
SKYWARN


Don't forget to ground your tomato plants. g


Nah, fried tomatoes are delicious, same with squash, onions, jalapeno
peppers, and using lightning to fry them saves me the money I'd be
spending to heat up the skillet hihi.

73 de Keith
--
KC8TCQ
ARRL Member - ARES
SKYWARN

Steveo February 19th 04 11:40 AM

(I Am Not George) wrote:
"Steveo" wrote in message
...

| | _____ _ _ ___| | _____ ___ __ ____ _ __ _ _| | ___
| |/ / _ \ | | |/ __| |/ _ \ \ /\ / / '_ \|_ / | '__| | | | |/ _ \
| __/ |_| | (__| | (_) \ V V /| | | |/ / | | | |_| | | __/
|_|\_\___|\__, |\___|_|\___/ \_/\_/ |_| |_/___| |_| \__,_|_|\___|


Whats that supposed to be the scratches on your dick from landfags teeth

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
/ \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \ / \
( G | E | O ) ( B | L | O | W | S ) ( G | O | A | T | S )
\_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/ \_/

--
Go 40 42 12

Dave Hall February 19th 04 12:51 PM

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:29:26 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From:
(Dave*Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
From:
(Dave*Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
From:
(I*Am*Not*George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days

**In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post
the other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.

I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know


what you're talking about.




Tut-tut,,you most certainly have a "pal" in Michigan.....you even
claimed you were "intimately" familiar with N8WWM's behavior and
repeater jamming activity so if it wasn't your Michigan bud who made you
"intimately" aware of the happenings that YOU felt important ebough to
bring to this forum for discussion,,,,,then who?


You're on drugs again. I know nothing about Doug's activities. You're
confusing me with Leland. Like I said before, you need to keep better
track of your objects of admiration.



You really need to keep better track of the


objects of your obsession .




One can understand how illustrating your hypocrisy would be misconstrued
by yourself as an "obsession" by another. It's a natural reaction from a
non-proactive individual.


Did we learn a new word this week? Wouldn't it just be better to say
"reactive" rather than "non-proactive"?

Anytime someone regularly pulls up the past quotes of others, which
can span many years, goes beyond the bounds of "normal" an into the
realm of obsessive compulsive behavior.



When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that
I have little to contribute to the group as it now
stands.





You always have had the need to reclarify your positions, Dave,,,you're
not very clear in your communication skills.


I can see why someone of your limited comprehensive ability would see
it that way.


.see, saying you are "not
hardly around' is nowhere near the same meaning as saying you have
little to contribute.",,but you of course, already know that...otherwise
the need wouldn't have existed for you to completely change what you
said.


To anyone else, who has even the slightest tendency toward a normal
personality, it would not be necessary to clarify what should be an
obvious statement. But one again your words underscore just how
irregular you are.



What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!


That's the way you took it.



Yes,,as that is exactly what you said.let's see it again, as it is
apparently paining you....

I'm hardly around much these days

_
They way I meant it should be fairly obvious to
anyone else who doesn't have a


comprehensive disorder.




Yea? Only "anyone" else isn;t looking to you for validation...........


The way you seem to be.

.....and I don't see "anyone else" coming to your defense who
misinterprets "I'm not hardly around these days" to be a synonym for "I
have little to contribute"


Because no one else care what you think, or what I may waste my time
saying back to you. But worry not, I'm ending this after this
response. You remain unworthy of rational discussion.



,,,LOL,,,,,,only those who live in their own
world and see things in their own manner and are unable to see things as
the majority can agree with that, Dave. The claims are so distant there
is no relation at all,,,,except in your mind.



Look in the mirror and repeat your previous statement.

and you're STILL obsessing with me.


That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.


What in any of those quotes do you find


hypocritical?




Your encouragement of others to break the law when you have cried like a
menstruating teen and callously attacked others for the exact same
behavior,,,merely giving information.



Where have I EVER "encouraged" people to break the law? You can't seem
to differentiate the difference between "encouraging" lawless
activity, and giving advice to "tread lightly".



I have always maintained that


certain activities are illegal. But if you are of


the mindset that you do not wish to abide by


those rules, at least go about it with a little


common sense and keep a low profile.




This smacks in the face of what you have claimed in the past,
Dave,,you're two faced.



Not at all to anyone with normal comprehensive skills. It's one thing
to state that a certain activity is illegal It's totally another to
acknowledge that the illegal activity exists, and how to be a good
neighbor and not be rude, ignorant, and disrespectful while doing it.

There's such a thing as the letter of the law. There's another thing
called the intent of the law. It is impractical to expect that
everyone will always adhere to the letter of the law in all cases. But
as long as you keep the intent of the law in mind, you will not be far
off the path. I don't expect you to understand this though.


There's no sense calling attention to yourself
by interfering with your neighbors or acting in
a disrespectful manner,


Agreed, too bad you don't practice what you preach..as that hasn't
stopped you from acting in the most blatant disrespectful manner toward
others for beahvior you took part in.


By calling something what it is? Hey, look, in the beginning, if
people were not so quick to deny that what they were doing was in fact
breaking federal laws, then there would be no need to keep reminding
them (you). If you would 've instead taken the attitude that "yea, I
know I break federal law, but I take steps to make sure that I'm not
interfering with other people", it would 've been a different story.

When you flaunt your actions by selectively breaking laws, as some
sort of God given "right" in everyone else's face, you essentially
make a mockery of our society. Those of us who respect the rule and
intent of law have a problem with that.

which would have the overall effect of painting
a big red bullseye on your forehead.


So unless you work for Target, that's not a


good thing.



You've always cringed when your behavior was illustrated, Dave.


Who's cringing?


You have even taken to quoting me.
I suppose that I could look at it as a silent
confirmation of the validity of my points.



What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.


If that's true, then why do you keep bringing
me up in past quotes?



Because your PAST is very relevant, as you can not run from it, no
matter what you do or say.


But why do you bring my name into a subject which has nothing to do
with me?

And I'm not running from the past, yet you seem to be the only one who
just doesn't get it. I've devoted a whole website to documenting the
best times that I've had in radio. Many of those activities were
somewhat illegal. Had I been busted then, then I would 've taken my
lumps like a man, instead of living in a state of denial, and
attempting to convince everyone else that what I was doing was
anything less than what it was.

And the funny thing about the past is that most people grow, and
mature as time goes on. Those reckless and irresponsible actions we
did as teenagers, we cringe about when we're parents ourselves. The
fact that I had engaged in illegal CB operation 20 years ago, does not
invalidate my right to point it out to others now. By your logic then,
a parent would have no right to discipline their children for the acts
that they themselves engaged in when they were kids.


Again, what you do or don't do, is no
*longer' any consequence, in other words,,,your words and actions now
are all for naught,,your past behavior tells the entire story,
especially when you break your neck trying to change what you plainly
said to mean something entirely diffferent,,(snicker).


Again, you are the only one who seems to care.


I suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom
of letting a sleeping dog alone.




But you;re not sleeping, Dave,,,you are up to your usual games and no
good,,it's why you lost YET ANOTHER ISP.


Here we go again. First of all, what "games" am I allegedly up to? And
secondly what action(s) have I engaged in, would result in the loss of
an ISP?

I have had 2 ISP's in 9 years. That's the long and short of it.


I never wasnted any problems
with you Dave, adn told you so way back when...you should have heeded
the advice you now ask of another when the table has turned, but
sure,,,,I can leave it alone, Dave,,,let's see if you can.,,that
includes your sock puppets.


I have no control on what others do. You should know that.


Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?



I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.


But what does that have to do with the topic at hand? Take it up with
Leland if you have an issue.



Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of
your own?




Sure,,,they were so profound they were responsible for you and the rest
of tream voobs downfall (read: snatched ISP's)..


Downfall? You mean that many of us got so tired of the childish
homosexual banter and ad-hominem attacks that we gave up posting?

The fact that you seem to think that ISP's were lost as a direct
result of actions on this newsgroup, underscores your either blatant
ignorance of internet rules, or is an example of the excessive
self-aggandizing of your relative importance in the grand scheme of
things.


Do you always base your principles on the
quotes of others?



No,,they arent my principles,,they are yours,,and eveyone knows I am
world champion of returning things to whence they came.


Whatever you think Walter Mitty. It would be helpful though, that
when you "return" things, that you return them to the proper people,
and in the original context. I understand that this may be beyond your
capability.


What's that they say about imitation being the
highest form of flattery?



Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!


If the shoe fits, Cinderella......



You can refer to a man as a woman all you wish,,it won;t help what ails
you.


True. I can't reverse the affects of getting older.


I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't
want to wake up one morning and see you
camped out on my doorstep......



You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.


I don't expect you to understand, but trust me,



You're a proven liar, Dave, and liars can not be trusted, so no, you
will not be trusted.


No one with any credibility had proven anything with respect to my
truthfulness. YOU have attempted in the past to twist my words to fit
your own self contrived opinion. That would hardly pass as "proof" in
any venue which attempts to preserve an ounce of credibility.


.....now, you can continue to choose to attack the
messenger as has been your specialty,
and continue to play the victim after initiating rabid attacks, but you
will never get away with it again.


When the "messenger" has repeatedly demonstrated psychological
disorders which affect their ability to distinguish what is considered
proper behavior, then they become fair game for disclosure of said
dysfunctions. In this case, the "messenger" suffers from anti-social
personality disorder, with traces of narcissistic personality disorder
and a bit of obsessive compulsive disorder thrown in to paint a
complete picture.

When taken in the context of these issues, the validity and judgement
of the "messenger" is automatically suspect, and any conclusions that
arise from said individual should be considered as nothing more than
hearsay.



S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs. I
gain much more satisfaction from having you share your beliefs with the
world.



Mr. Pot, meet Mr Kettle.


Dave
"Sandbagger"

I Am Not George February 19th 04 06:57 PM

(Twistedhed) wrote in message ...
You ask for the quote,,I provide it,,,and it's my
fault that Dave Hall N3CVJ breaks the law, claims he doesn't and
encourages others to break FCC law.


Dave Hall does not encourage people to break the fcc law then pretend
he doesn't thats your job Twistidave.

Twistedhed February 19th 04 07:44 PM

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) while under the
influence of constipation, felt compelled to attack against every little
nuance that induces thought other than his own, damaged his delicate
self-esteem and wrote:


Then shut up already.




LOL...now,,about your claim that your ISP outsources to Colorado.....






I am Twistedhed*, who has written great things..that you don't
understand! If people talk about art, they mean me, not you, crawling,
nibbling worms who should be crushed under my foot!



*Schubert



Franz Schubert 1797-1828




Can't touch this!


Twistedhed February 19th 04 07:46 PM

From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) begged for attention by writing:
Freedom is participation in power - Cicero

Twisty, it's obvious that you Kant comprehend


freedom at all.




But I can be educated,,you'll always be a liar. Your claim,,,,,,how long
has your ISP outsourced to Colorado from Washington? LOL...



Can't touch this!

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong


Twistedhed February 19th 04 07:54 PM

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
Randy you don't even know who the **** your


talking to so



WA3MOJ,,,YOU are the one who is seriously lost,,,,,,you haven't a clue
who you are directing your cries.


STFU things were fine here Steveo took a


rest and so did landfag and what do you know


we had some cb topics for a change. Then


Twisted****forbrains decided to troll Dave Hall




You're wrong. Dave was screwing around againi and I decided to bring it
to light. He doesn't want to persue it and neither do I. Go stand in the
corner with Lelnad.

Now you run in to go to bat for Twisty?



You come across as one paranoid homosexual.
Merely because one tells you to mind your beezwax and be quiet you
assume they are supporting ME? LHAHAHAHHAHA! Look, junior T boy,,,I need
no support,,,there is only what,,,,three or four of you,,those aren't
fair odds, you girls need some more people! You'e been getting clobbered
for years,,,LOL! I think it's hilarious to imagine you scratching your
balding head wondering how in the hell all this wonderful resiliency
took place when you weren't looking? Go ponder it awhile,,perhaps you
won't get slammed the next time you try to talk on the air.



back to the pipe asspuppet



U......Can't Touch this, 'cause I'm your Captain, and ain't nothing you
can do about it! Enjoy the hospitality you receive.


Twistedhed February 19th 04 07:57 PM

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
"Steveo" wrote in message
...
|=A0|=A0_____=A0_=A0=A0=A0_=A0=A0___|=A0|=A0_____= A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0___=A0_=
_=A0=A0___
|=A0|/=A0/=A0_=A0\=A0|=A0|=A0|/=A0__|=A0|/=A0_=A0\=A0\=A0/\=A0/=A0/=A0'_=A0=
\|_=A0=A0
|=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0__/=A0|_|=A0|=A0(__|=A0|=A0(_)=A0\=A0V=A0=A0V=A0/|=A0|=A0=
|=A0|/=A0/
|_|\_\___|\__,=A0|\___|_|\___/=A0\_/\_/=A0|_|=A0|_/___
Whats that supposed to be the scratches on


your dick from landfags teeth



Always with the homosexuality expressions...........anyways,,,,,it's a
badge of honor,,,those things have a funny way of manipulating you
impotent keesters...y'all are eventually driven underground! How
sweeeeet it izzzz!


U can't touch this!

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong


Frank Gilliland February 19th 04 08:30 PM

In , after frantically
searching for any shred of evidence to back up his claim that I am five
different hams, (Twistedhed) wrote:

From:
(Frank*Gilliland)
In ,
(Twistedhed) begged for attention by writing:
Freedom is participation in power - Cicero

Twisty, it's obvious that you Kant comprehend


freedom at all.




But I can be educated,,you'll always be a liar. Your claim,,,,,,how long
has your ISP outsourced to Colorado from Washington? LOL...



Oh god, here we go again.... ok, who do you think I am -this- week, Twisty? A
ham in Colorado? And what distorted, barely relevant piece of information are
you going to post as definitive proof -this- time? Have you tried this link yet?

http://www.antionline.com/tools-and-...216.64.140.205








-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Frank Gilliland February 19th 04 08:43 PM

In ,
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From:
(Frank*Gilliland) while under the
influence of constipation, felt compelled to attack against every little
nuance that induces thought other than his own, damaged his delicate
self-esteem and wrote:


Then shut up already.




LOL...now,,about your claim that your ISP outsources to Colorado.....



Actually, I think newsfeeds.com is out of North Dakota, but I'm willing to be
entertained with whatever trivial information you have discovered while pursuing
your obsession with me.


I am Twistedhed*, who has written great things..that you don't
understand! If people talk about art, they mean me, not you, crawling,
nibbling worms who should be crushed under my foot!



*Schubert



Franz Schubert 1797-1828



Where's Peter the Hypocrite and his copyright cops?







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Twistedhed February 19th 04 09:17 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:29:26 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
From:
(Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
From:
(I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days

=A0=A0


In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post the
other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.



I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know


what you're talking about.




Tut-tut,,you most certainly have a "pal" in Michigan.....you even
claimed you were "intimately" familiar with N8WWM's behavior and
repeater jamming activity so if it wasn't your Michigan bud who made you
"intimately" aware of the happenings that YOU felt important ebough to
bring to this forum for discussion,,,,,then who?




You're on drugs again.




"Again"? LOL,,you're reaching so far with desperation you reduced
yourself to making false implications that I have indulged in narcotics.
185 pounds of twisted steel and sex appeal. No smoking, no drinking, no
drugs. I'm in better shape now than I ever was...but what is important
here, is your desperation resulting in malcious, unfounded attacks meant
to inflame.



I know nothing about Doug's activities.



I'm going to give you a chance to clear your foggy head...


You're confusing me with Leland.




No,,I'm not. Second chance....


Like I said before, you need to keep better


track of your objects of admiration.



Hoo-boy,,,ok,,,so when I repost your claim about having info on
Doug,,,what shall we chalk your continued denials up to, Dave?.....
Drugs?
Your little posse came to me Dave, not the other way around.



You really need to keep better track of the


objects of your obsession .




One can understand how illustrating your hypocrisy would be misconstrued
by yourself as an "obsession" by another. It's a natural reaction from a
non-proactive individual.


Did we learn a new word this week?





(shrug) Beats me,,I can't even imagine anyone including you as a "we"
when speaking, given your past performances on this forum, but I guess
your question would hinge on, "Who, in addition to yourself, are you
referring as "we"? "Cause the vernacular you appear to be experiencing
discomfort over isn't new,,,then again, apparently it is, to yourself.



Wouldn't it just be better to say "reactive"


rather than "non-proactive"?





No. One can be non-proactive without being reactive.




Anytime someone regularly pulls up the past


quotes of others, which can span many years,


goes beyond the bounds of "normal" an into


the realm of obsessive compulsive behavior.





You've done it a myriad of times over the years, Davie. And you've done
so in many a malicous and unprovoked manner.





When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that
I have little to contribute to the group as it now
stands.



You always have had the need to reclarify your positions, Dave,,,you're
not very clear in your communication skills.


I can see why someone of your limited


comprehensive ability would see it that way.



see, saying you are "not
hardly around' is nowhere near the same meaning as saying you have
little to contribute.",,but you of course, already know that...otherwise
the need wouldn't have existed for you to completely change what you
said.



To anyone else, who has even the slightest


tendency toward a normal personality, it would
not be necessary to clarify what should be an


obvious statement. But one again your words


underscore just how irregular you are.






What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!



That's the way you took it.





Yes,,as that is exactly what you said.let's see it again, as it is
apparently paining you....



I'm hardly around much these days


_
They way I meant it should be fairly obvious to
anyone else who doesn't have a


comprehensive disorder.



Yea? Only "anyone" else isn't looking to you for validation...........



The way you seem to be.





Delusions, Dave, delusions. I merely mentioned you to Geogre WA3MOJ, no
malice in the post,,,I didn't even argue with your position,,,I merely
quoted you verbatim for Geogre and was called a liar for the effort. I
chose to illustrate I did not lie and out you came. Plus,,you were
funnin' around anyways,,,

_
.....and I don't see "anyone else" coming to your defense who
misinterprets "I'm not hardly around these days" to be a synonym for "I
have little to contribute"


Because no one else care what you think, or


what I may waste my time saying back to you.






That's pretty funny, Dave. You really believe that you get no defenders
because of what I say,,,hmm,,there you go again blaming someone else for
your problems, and look who you choose to blame for your lack of
support...LOL!





But worry not, I'm ending this after this


response. You remain unworthy of rational


discussion.





Yea,,,especially when those discussions are backed with proof of your
own posts.






The claims are so distant there is no relation
at all,,,,except in your mind.



Look in the mirror and repeat your previous


statement.




Why? It won't change what you said to any other meaning.



and you're STILL obsessing with me.




That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.



What in any of those quotes do you find


hypocritical?




Your encouragement of others to break the law when you have cried like a
menstruating teen and callously attacked others for the exact same
behavior,,,merely giving information.


Where have I EVER "encouraged" people to


break the law? You can't seem to differentiate


the difference between "encouraging" lawless


activity, and giving advice to "tread lightly".





HAha,,no Dave, you can't...it's what adheres team voob and the
self-described cb hating akcgirlz,,,your group can not differentiate
between discussion and actions. Now, look in the mirror and repeat your
previous statement...hahaha!






I have always maintained that


certain activities are illegal. But if you are of


the mindset that you do not wish to abide by


those rules, at least go about it with a little


common sense and keep a low profile.






This smacks in the face of what you have claimed in the past,
Dave,,you're two faced.


Not at all to anyone with normal


comprehensive skills.





Your arrogance at placing yourself above all others, in the manner that
you appoint yourself judge and jury of who is worthy of when you choose
to be two faced has always been well documented, Dave. I believe this is
probably the fourth time you have stated such, yet you still balme
others for your personal problems. It's why you're so likeable, Davie.




It's one thing to state that a certain activity is


illegal It's totally another to acknowledge that


the illegal activity exists, and how to be a good
neighbor and not be rude, ignorant, and


disrespectful while doing it.





Same with your internet behavior.




There's such a thing as the letter of the


law.




And there are TOS,,as you found out several times last year.



There's another thing called the intent of the


law. It is impractical to expect that everyone


will always adhere to the letter of the law in all


cases. But as long as you keep the intent of


the law in mind, you will not be far off the path.




Your intent as been harassment, Dave, in many cases. Someone like
yourself, that can't even hold onto ISP's for the duration of the
initial agreement due to violations, is in no position to preach. Dave,
don't preach. You'e been shown that you have broke the law with your
Texas Star and your other activities when you were playing high-power cb
when you had a cb repair business...but guess what, Dave, no one was a
jagoff to you like you were to those in here speaking of the exact same
behavior you have participated.




I don't expect you to understand this though.




Naturally. You;re the one with the self-image problem, otherwise you
would have no need to make false accusations in such malicious manners
as you frequently do.

There's no sense calling attention to yourself


by interfering with your neighbors or acting in


a


disrespectful manner,






=A0=A0Agreed, too bad you don't practice what you
preach..as that hasn't stopped you from acting in the most blatant
disrespectful manner toward others for beahvior you took part in.



By calling something what it is?






No,,by crying about it on an internet forum and constantly badgering
someone for not sharing your point of view with the law. For calling
names other than "illegal" for the same beahvior you have engaged. For
getting off-topic and attempting to make your topics those of the
personal lives of those you were unable to exhibit proper comunication
skills..need more?



Hey, look, in the beginning, if people were not


so quick to deny that what they were doing


was in fact breaking federal laws, then there


would be no need to keep reminding them


(you).





Hehehehhe! The fact you are so self-deluded you think such duty is
somehow your responsibility is intensely gratifying.




If you would 've instead taken the attitude that
"yea, I know I break federal law, but I take


steps to make sure that I'm not interfering with
other people", it would 've been a different


story.






There you go again, making untrue accusations. I must have really pizzed
on your cornflakes for you to harbor such malice that you care not one
iota for your own reputation.
You have been crying that tune for years, Dave, only there exists no
post by me expressing anything other than staying off the hammie bands
and professing the virtues of low power dx with the exception of a few
recent escapades on 6 and a recent post rubbing Geogres nose in his own
fecal droppings.



When you flaunt your actions by selectively


breaking laws, as some sort of God given




As you did, Dave,,you keep acting like you did no wrong when you clearly
have done everything you are crying the pansie blues over.



"right" in everyone else's face, you essentially


make a mockery of our society.




LOL,,no Dave,,only disciples of madness actually believe my talking to
another country or state on my cb is making a mockery of our society.
Winter that bad up there this year, eh Dave? You need some sunshine, OM.
Your brain is starting to freeze when you make comments like that..


Those of us who respect the rule and intent of


law have a problem with that.




And those of us who respect the rules of the internet have a problem
with people like yourself and every single one of the lowlifes you have
defended in the past for their internet scumbag actions..



which would have the overall effect of painting
a big red bullseye on your forehead.


So unless you work for Target, that's not a


good thing.



You've always cringed when your behavior was illustrated, Dave.



Who's cringing?




You are. The T on your forehead was a twist original long before your
bullseye...ask Geogre,,he's so smitten with me and I have made such an
impact on his twisted sampled psyche, he takes to quoting me weekly,
only he doesn't give me credit, so I let him think he's getting away
with something clever or original..I'm like that.


You have even taken to quoting me.


I suppose that I could look at it as a silent


confirmation of the validity of my points.




What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.


If that's true, then why do you keep bringing


me up in past quotes?



Because your PAST is very relevant, as you can not run from it, no
matter what you do or say. And I only done it once.


But why do you bring my name into a subject


which has nothing to do with me?




You know good and well why, Dave.



And I'm not running from the past, yet you


seem to be the only one who just doesn't get


it. I've devoted a whole website to


documenting the best times that I've had in


radio. Many of those activities were somewhat
illegal. Had I been busted then, then I would


've taken my lumps like a man, instead of


living in a state of denial, and attempting to


convince everyone else that what I was doing


was anything less than what it was.






That's odd,,I have stated that I would most definitely pay the piper
should it come down to that,,in fact,,,I believe I said it before you
did, and I think you are paraphrasing me, as you enjoyed my article so
much....I still must thank Lelnad for the fruits of his labor...looking
back to those posts of my article lovingly as we do, we can see I did
indeed claim that exact quote, way back in the nineties...imagine
that,,,,,and here I sit, twisting my head,,,looking like this.





And the funny thing about the past is that most
people grow, and mature as time goes on.


Those reckless and irresponsible actions we


did as teenagers, we cringe about when we're


parents ourselves. The fact that I had


engaged in illegal CB operation 20 years ago,


does not invalidate my right to point it out to


others now.




No,,it makes you a hypocrite when you still break the law. In fact, your
virtues are of illegally monitoring underage girls talk of sex,,,,,so
don;t open the "look at me, I'm self-righteous" page with me, it's
written in disappearing ink.



By your logic then, a parent would have no


right to discipline their children for the acts that
they themselves engaged in when they were


kids.





Try to remain on topic and relevant.


Again, what you do or don't do, is no
*longer' any consequence, in other words,,,your words and actions now
are all for naught,,your past behavior tells the entire story,
especially when you break your neck trying to change what you plainly
said to mean something entirely diffferent,,(snicker).


Again, you are the only one who seems to


care.

=A0


No Dave,,you're the one that leaped on my post and claimed you just
"happened to be in the hood" and then I laughed at you and you tried to
change what you said.



=A0I suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom


of letting a sleeping dog alone.



But you;re not sleeping, Dave,,,you are up to your usual games and no
good,,it's why you lost YET ANOTHER ISP.


Here we go again. First of all, what "games"


am I allegedly up to?



Tut-tut..no questions..I decide the questions, UNTIL,,you answer the
ones you refuse,,,you know,,the ones that showed you a lying POS...the
ones where you claimed you had info on a cb bust in Philly, then you
claimed it was outside Philly, then you ran from the claim in
embarrassed frustration.



And secondly what action(s) have I engaged


in, would result in the loss of an ISP?


I have had 2 ISP's in 9 years. That's the long


and short of it.





And dozens of accesses to the group.



I never wasnted any problems
with you Dave, adn told you so way back when...you should have heeded
the advice you now ask of another when the table has turned, but
sure,,,,I can leave it alone, Dave,,,let's see if you can.,,that
includes your sock puppets.


I have no control on what others do. You


should know that.





Never claimed anything different.


Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?



I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.


But what does that have to do with the topic at
hand?




You are the one that brought up interpretive logic, not I.


Take it up with Leland if you have an issue.


Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of


your own?



=A0=A0Sure,,,they were so profound they were responsible for you and the
rest of tream voobs downfall (read: snatched ISP's)..


Downfall? You mean that many of us got so


tired of the childish homosexual banter and


ad-hominem attacks that we gave up posting?



No,,I mean several of you were with accesses and after a certain abuse
reporting was CONFIRMED your accesses suddnely disappeared,,in
fact,there was a rash of lids, in a short manner, losing their
accesses,,but we pretend they were trying out new ones and weren't happy
with several of them....you understand,,dealing with damaged psyches and
all, don't ya' Dave!



The fact that you seem to think that ISP's were
lost as a direct result of actions on this


newsgroup, underscores your either blatant


ignorance of internet rules, or is an example of


the excessive self-aggandizing of your relative
importance in the grand scheme of things.





Not at all. Dogie lost several.
That must be one f*** of a case of "ignorance"
you got going on.


Do you always base your principles on the


quotes of others?



No,,they arent my principles,,they are yours,,and eveyone knows I am
world champion of returning things to whence they came.


Whatever you think Walter Mitty.



I'm not the one with imagined status and an imagined duty to lash out at
all I do not comprehend...you are Davie.



It would be helpful though, that when you


"return" things, that you return them to the


proper people, and in the original context. I


understand that this may be beyond your


capability.





Tell ya' what,,, I call your bluff, as always,,you go first, and we'll
see your results,,then I'll pull a rabbit out of the magic hat. Your
move, Davie.



What's that they say about imitation being the


highest form of flattery?



Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!


If the shoe fits, Cinderella......



You can refer to a man as a woman all you wish,,it won;t help what ails
you.


True. I can't reverse the affects of getting
older.




That will come in handy when I post your claims about knowing intimate
details concerning N8.


I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't


want to wake up one morning and see you


camped out on my doorstep......



You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.


I don't expect you to understand, but trust me,



You're a proven liar, Dave, and liars can not be trusted, so no, you
will not be trusted.


No one with any credibility had proven


anything with respect to my truthfulness.




Too bad for you, you have no say in who has credibility on the net.
Twistin' the night away...


YOU have attempted in the past to twist my


words to fit your own self contrived opinion.




No. In fact, I have posted your own words verbatim many times and here
come Davie to chnege the meaning of what he posted,,,,always with the
disclaimer "BUT WHAT I MEANT WAS..."
Yawn.


That would hardly pass as "proof" in any


venue which attempts to preserve an ounce of
credibility.

..


Credibility is backing what you say...this is where our problem with me
began..you made a claimmmyou brought a relevant claim to this group,,,a
bull**** claim,,,you knew it, I knew it, and everyone else that knows
how to access information knew it. For some reason,, you chose to expand
on this lie you told and as with all lies, you were required to tell
more to support the original lie. It got too hot for you when I demanded
any type proof at all your claim existed, you went offtopic, attacking
me, getting personal, and became a jagoff for no reason. You lied, were
called on it, and your excuse, (as always) for not substantiating your
claim,,,had me as your reason. Credibility? Make us all laugh, Davie.






....now, you can continue to choose to attack the messenger as has been
your specialty,
and continue to play the victim after initiating rabid attacks, but you
will never get away with it again.


When the "messenger" has repeatedly


demonstrated psychological disorders which





And the everpresent self-elevated status. Not only have your delusions
annointed yourself with the power of world radio cop, but a graduate of
an accredited medical school, in addition : )...hahhahah!


affect their ability to distinguish what is


considered proper behavior, then they


become fair game for disclosure of said


dysfunctions.






Yes, you have admitted many times your discrimination and penchant for
the handicapped, the crippled, the infirm, the old, the wounded, and any
who suffer ailments, impairments, or behavior considered improper by
yourself. That you admit you would make sport of such limitations of
those that would suffer them, illustrates what a lowlife trash
receptacle you really are.



In this case, the "messenger" suffers from


anti-social personality disorder, with traces of


narcissistic personality disorder and a bit of


obsessive compulsive disorder thrown in to


paint a complete picture.


When taken in the context of these issues, the
validity and judgement of the "messenger" is


automatically suspect, and any conclusions


that arise from said individual should be


considered as nothing more than hearsay.






Only your claims atren't hearsay and since you have no status, no
accreditation, no nothing, what you say is merely a lost individual that
fancies himself some type status and importance,,pobably because you;ve
been starved of such all your life.


S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs. I
gain much more satisfaction from having you share your beliefs with the
world.


Mr. Pot, meet Mr Kettle.


Dave


"Sandbagger"





LOL....your diagnosis' (hehe,,how cute) only came to light with your
inability to support your own lies concerning a busted cber in Philly.


Can't touch this!


The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong


Steveo February 20th 04 12:10 AM

Frank Gilliland wrote:
Actually, I think newsfeeds.com is out of North Dakota


-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Don't they have like 19 servers? g

--
Go 40 42 12

Steveo February 20th 04 12:18 AM

(Twistedhed) wrote:
Can't touch this!

Bust a move. g

--
Go 40 42 12

Dave Hall February 20th 04 12:38 PM

On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:17:59 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:



In the first manner, you're always around, Dave.


And I'll continue to be "around" in a casual listening mode, and I'll
post when I see a topic worthy of interjecting my opinion. Preferably
one that talks about radio.

You go ahead and continue to believe your paranoid fantasy that I
somehow masquerade as a bunch of other people, for the sole purpose of
trolling you. It's not outside of the symptoms of your psychological
issues, for you to feel that there couldn't possibly be a large group
of people who find fault with you, and instead pacify yourself into
believing that all of your detractors are really one or two people.
It's all part of what ails you. Paranoia is part of APD, and your
self aggrandizing is part of your narcissism. There is no point in
arguing with you. Like the old saying "You try to tell a nut that he's
nuts, and he'll tell you that you're crazy". So I won't bother trying
to explain anything to you. All you see are lies. For you to accept
the truth would cause your fantasy world to come tumbling down on you
like a house of cards.

What you think is irrelevant and unimportant in the grand scheme of
things. You go ahead and believe that I've had "several" ISP's
revoked. I know the truth. I also find it ironic, to the point of
laughability, that you continue to accuse others of "communications
deficits", when by far, it is you who fail to grasp even the simplest
analogies, concepts, logic, or even simple statements without taking
their meanings out of context. Doesn't it seem a bit funny that all of
these people who spar with you have "communications deficits" while
you are fine? The old: "I'm all right, it's the world that's crazy",
phenomenon. More illustrations on how truly demented you really are.

But I'm not going to continue to feed your psychological craving for
attention. So I'm back out again until I feel the need to smack you
back into reality once more, when you make another outlandish claim
that involves me. But don't expect to keep me on the hook any longer
than necessary to point out your (many) problems once again. Further
discussion after that would be pointless.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Twistedhed February 20th 04 02:17 PM

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Thu, 19 Feb 2004 16:17:59 -0500 (EST),

(Twistedhed) wrote:
In the first manner, you're always around, Dave.
And I'll continue to be "around" in a casual


listening mode,




Which is a far cry from you claiming you HAVEN'T been around.


and I'll post when I see a topic worthy of


interjecting my opinion. Preferably one that


talks about radio.





You should have followed your own advice and practiced what you preach
long ago, but alas, you did not, and you still don't,,,your mouth writes
checks your azz can't cash. Your delusions of grandeur of holding a
medical degree is not on topic to radio, so once again, your actions
speak louder than your words.


You go ahead and continue to believe your


paranoid fantasy that I somehow masquerade


as a bunch of other people,





Never said that, dave, You have a serious problem making untrue
accusations about those who choose to point out your fun and
games..........I never said you masquerade as a "bunch of other
people"....no,,in fact,,you do it one at a time until they are yanked.


for the sole purpose of trolling you.





(muttermuttermutter) Hey, this isn't the first time you were forced to
admit your trolling.



It's not outside of the symptoms of your


psychological issues, for you to feel that there


couldn't possibly be a large group of people




In the first manner, you can't even hold your claim for more than a
sentence or two. The sickness that has you suffering severe delusions of
grandeur and fancying yourself a member of the AMA has nothing to do
with radio,,,LOL,,,keep talking out the other side of your two faces,
Dave.



who find fault with you, and instead pacify


yourself into believing that all of your


detractors are really one or two people.




In the second manner, only yourself and Geogre have attempted to lend an
illusion of support to your actions and name calling and behavior on
this group,,,only team voob and your member of N8WWM self-described
"akc" is not a large group of people..merely the people that were named
by name by Voob (including you) who said we would always have trouble
with you...he was right about that,,in any event,,you loser lids that
were reduced are not a large group,,,you are a very tiny group that
needs validation from others in order to shore up some selfconfidence
and esteem.



It's all part of what ails you.




Sweet homage...


Paranoia is part of APD, and your self


aggrandizing is part of your narcissism. There


is no point in arguing with you.





Exactly,,only you haven;t figured out how to discuss without personal
offtopic insult,,,et,,,once again,,you blame another for your
shortcomings,,,,,,,lol,,and lookie who you chose,,,,HAHAHA!


Like the old saying "You try to tell a nut that


he's nuts, and he'll tell you that you're crazy".


So I won't bother trying to explain anything to


you.




You never did...you ran and turned nasty, beligerent and foul and
ignorant when asked nicely to bacl your claims that you brought to the
group concerning a cber you claimed was busted. Again,,your
problem,,your deficit,,your blaming of another..



All you see are lies.




You were given a chance and lied, Im not the only one that lknows it,,in
fact,,all who know how to access such information knowas you are full of
**** with your malicious lie concerning your bull**** claim.



For you to accept the truth would cause your


fantasy world to come tumbling down on you


like a house of cards.





And what have you provided relating to your claim that you refer to as
"truth"? LOL..nothing,,when asked,,you became offtopic (non-radio)
insultive, and unprovoked malice emanated from your piehole for weeks.

What you think is irrelevant and unimportant in
the grand scheme of things. You go ahead


and believe that I've had "several" ISP's


revoked. I know the truth.




Proven liars are incapable of truth. You made the claim,,the bburden of
proof is on the claimant,,,,just as in a court of law.



I also find it ironic, to the point of laughability,


that you continue to accuse others of


"communications deficits", when by far, it is


you who fail to grasp even the simplest


analogies, concepts, logic, or even simple


statements without taking their meanings out


of context. Doesn't it seem a bit funny that all


of these people who spar with you have


"communications deficits" while you are fine?





Not at all,,,,one merely needs to look at how hard you intentionally
attempt to give the false impression that your little group of team voob
is "all these people" and more than you, Gillinad, KC8LDO, and Geogre
and N8.....it;s not,,,,you and these lids are the trouble on this group
and always have been.



The old: "I'm all right, it's the world that's


crazy", phenomenon. More illustrations on


how truly demented you really are.




run, davie, run, little Davie...LOL..and advance that medical degree,,in
fact, you can taste it you want education and status so bad....


But I'm not going to continue to feed your


psychological craving for attention. So I'm


back out again until I feel the need to smack


you back into reality once more, when you


make another outlandish claim that involves


me.





HAHHA,,the claims are yours,,vertbatim,,,and yes,,they are ost cettaily
outlandish....such as your sick twisted claimed preference at
eavesdropping illegally on cordless phones to listen to teen girls speak
of sex,,you're a pervert, Dave...a sex freak with issues concerning
minors.




But don't expect to keep me on the hook any


longer than necessary to point out your


(many) problems once again. Further


discussion after that would be pointless.


Dave


"Sandbagger"


http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj


As long as you think you were believed concerning the cber that you
claim was busted,,,the Phelps Stationmaster you claimed you had then
couldn't remember when asked,,and listening to underage girs talk of
sex,,as long as you believe this is normal behavior for a middle aged
man,,,,,,,yes, Dave,,you have mega problems,,,but you go on thinking I'm
the reason for your sickness and perversion.

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong


I Am Not George February 20th 04 06:40 PM

(Twistedhed) wrote in message ...
As long as you think you were believed concerning the cber that you
claim was busted,,,the Phelps Stationmaster you claimed you had then
couldn't remember when asked,,and listening to underage girs talk of
sex,,as long as you believe this is normal behavior for a middle aged
man,,,,,,,yes, Dave,,you have mega problems,,,but you go on thinking I'm
the reason for your sickness and perversion.



From: Mr. X )
Subject: ***TEST YOUR KNOWLEDGE OF TWISTEDHED***


8. Twistedhed's crusade against Dave Hall is fueled by
which of the following imaginary "wrongs"?

a) Phelps, CBer in Philly, Villanova account
b) Mr. Phelps, Philly Cheese Steak, Vanilla Coke
c) Raphael, Regis Philbin, The Village People

N8WWM February 21st 04 06:12 PM

The Village People

I plat there tunes when i give aaron a blumpkin.

You ask w


Steveo February 22nd 04 01:25 PM

N8WWM wrote:
The Village People

I plat there tunes when i give aaron a blumpkin.

You ask w

****er spells like geo.

--
Mopar http://www.allpar.com/mopar.html
Go 40 42 12

rsilly February 22nd 04 04:10 PM

On Sun, 22 Feb 2004 08:18:27 -0600, Duke Of Windsor
wrote:

Steveo wrote in news:20040222082521.600
:

N8WWM wrote:
The Village People

I plat there tunes when i give aaron a blumpkin.

You ask w

****er spells like geo.


Yeah and sucks a good dick like your wife too, while she talks on CB.


SHE SUCKS A GOOD DICK LIKE GEORGE DOES?

February 23rd 04 12:55 AM

Duke Of Windsor wrote:
Steveo wrote in
****er spells like geo.


Yeah and sucks a good dick like your wife too, while she talks on CB.


It kills you that Steve has a wife and you have a Ron Jeremy love doll, eh
Magellin?

--
____________________________
Pear pimples for hairy fishnuts?



Steveo February 23rd 04 01:02 AM

wrote:
Duke Of Windsor wrote:
Steveo wrote in
****er spells like geo.


Yeah and sucks a good dick like your wife too, while she talks on CB.


It kills you that Steve has a wife and you have a Ron Jeremy love doll,
eh Magellin?

He enjoys gellin with the felon.

--
Mopar http://www.allpar.com/mopar.html
Go 40 42 12

Landshark February 23rd 04 03:55 AM


"Steveo" wrote in message
...
wrote:
Duke Of Windsor wrote:
Steveo wrote in
****er spells like geo.

Yeah and sucks a good dick like your wife too, while she talks on CB.


It kills you that Steve has a wife and you have a Ron Jeremy love doll,
eh Magellin?

He enjoys gellin with the felon.

--
Mopar http://www.allpar.com/mopar.html



LMAO!!!, you're killing me g.............


Landshark


--
The world is good-natured to people
who are good natured.




All times are GMT +1. The time now is 10:21 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
RadioBanter.com