A person who so poorly protected his own home as to suffer
completely unnecessary computer and TV damage will now teach
me? One who even posted the classic urban myth about concrete
damage to prove Ufer grounding does not work? You just
realized something: someone on the other side does have a few
decades of experience and engineering degrees. If you had
one, then the concept of resistance and impedance would have
been correctly posted. However someone even did read 'tower
talk' - and posted citations from 'tower talk' in direct
contradiction to your posted myths. Well at least you are not
posting personal attacks this time. The world can get better.

In the meantime this is a discussion about the OPs antenna
mast; not a forum for personal attacks. The OP must earth
his antenna mast both for lightning protection AND as required
by the National Electrical Code. That answers his question.
Please feel free to address the purpose of this thread - the
Original Poster's original request for information -
Zeeeeeeee3 originally posted:
Planning to install a base antenna as soon as things warm up and
could use some help..........

So far I have an Imax 99 antenna.
I was thinking of attaching it to the garage side of my house
which is about~20 feet high at the peak. I would take a 5'
piece of antenna mast and pound it several feet into the
ground to secure the bottom and then attach 2 more 10' pieces
on top of that. The mast could be secured to the house with
several of those wall mount brackets. How does this sound
so far?

Now I understand that it must be grounded. Would having the
bottom section of mast pounded into the ground as I mentioned
suffice? or will I need to attach it to a seperate 8' ground
rod? If a seperate rod is needed, do I attach the ground
wire to the antenna mounting plate or the mast or either?
Near the top of the mast or near the bottom?

I also have read of the need for a 'static discharge unit' for
my coax. Could anyone recommend one? Google searches are not
helping me out much.

Have some more questions, but this seems enough for now. Any
help would be really appreciated. I've been trying to piece
information together from the web, but still need some more
help.

Lancer wrote:
Frank is 100% correct in what he posted. You have chosen to either
not fully read what he posted, or you are having trouble trying to
comprehend what he wrote. Take some time and read what others, who
have real experience, have written on the subject.

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:58:03 -0500, w_tom wrote:

A person who so poorly protected his own home as to suffer
completely unnecessary computer and TV damage will now teach
me? One who even posted the classic urban myth about concrete
damage to prove Ufer grounding does not work? You just
realized something: someone on the other side does have a few
decades of experience and engineering degrees. If you had
one, then the concept of resistance and impedance would have
been correctly posted. However someone even did read 'tower
talk' - and posted citations from 'tower talk' in direct
contradiction to your posted myths. Well at least you are not
posting personal attacks this time. The world can get better.

In the meantime this is a discussion about the OPs antenna
mast; not a forum for personal attacks. The OP must earth
his antenna mast both for lightning protection AND as required
by the National Electrical Code. That answers his question.
Please feel free to address the purpose of this thread - the
Original Poster's original request for information -
Zeeeeeeee3 originally posted:

It has several times, which you have chosen to ignore. Use proper
grounds and disconnect his equipment from the antenna and mains.
Your answer is use proper grounds, but don't disconnect any equipment.
Now which one makes more sense? Which one would better protect his
equipment? Which one offers more protection?

In , Lancer
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:58:03 -0500, w_tom wrote:

A person who so poorly protected his own home as to suffer
completely unnecessary computer and TV damage will now teach
me? One who even posted the classic urban myth about concrete
damage to prove Ufer grounding does not work? You just
realized something: someone on the other side does have a few
decades of experience and engineering degrees. If you had
one, then the concept of resistance and impedance would have
been correctly posted. However someone even did read 'tower
talk' - and posted citations from 'tower talk' in direct
contradiction to your posted myths. Well at least you are not
posting personal attacks this time. The world can get better.

In the meantime this is a discussion about the OPs antenna
mast; not a forum for personal attacks. The OP must earth
his antenna mast both for lightning protection AND as required
by the National Electrical Code. That answers his question.
Please feel free to address the purpose of this thread - the
Original Poster's original request for information -
Zeeeeeeee3 originally posted:

It has several times, which you have chosen to ignore. Use proper
grounds and disconnect his equipment from the antenna and mains.
Your answer is use proper grounds, but don't disconnect any equipment.
Now which one makes more sense? Which one would better protect his
equipment? Which one offers more protection?


Hey Lancer, don't make it too simple. It's all about "impedance", don'cha know?






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:04:05 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Lancer
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:58:03 -0500, w_tom wrote:

A person who so poorly protected his own home as to suffer
completely unnecessary computer and TV damage will now teach
me? One who even posted the classic urban myth about concrete
damage to prove Ufer grounding does not work? You just
realized something: someone on the other side does have a few
decades of experience and engineering degrees. If you had
one, then the concept of resistance and impedance would have
been correctly posted. However someone even did read 'tower
talk' - and posted citations from 'tower talk' in direct
contradiction to your posted myths. Well at least you are not
posting personal attacks this time. The world can get better.

In the meantime this is a discussion about the OPs antenna
mast; not a forum for personal attacks. The OP must earth
his antenna mast both for lightning protection AND as required
by the National Electrical Code. That answers his question.
Please feel free to address the purpose of this thread - the
Original Poster's original request for information -
Zeeeeeeee3 originally posted:

It has several times, which you have chosen to ignore. Use proper
grounds and disconnect his equipment from the antenna and mains.
Your answer is use proper grounds, but don't disconnect any equipment.
Now which one makes more sense? Which one would better protect his
equipment? Which one offers more protection?


Hey Lancer, don't make it too simple. It's all about "impedance", don'cha know?


Couldn't I get a correct impedance match with a 1/4 wave of bus bar?
Now what did he say the frequency of lightning was?

In , Lancer
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:04:05 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Lancer
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:58:03 -0500, w_tom wrote:

A person who so poorly protected his own home as to suffer
completely unnecessary computer and TV damage will now teach
me? One who even posted the classic urban myth about concrete
damage to prove Ufer grounding does not work? You just
realized something: someone on the other side does have a few
decades of experience and engineering degrees. If you had
one, then the concept of resistance and impedance would have
been correctly posted. However someone even did read 'tower
talk' - and posted citations from 'tower talk' in direct
contradiction to your posted myths. Well at least you are not
posting personal attacks this time. The world can get better.

In the meantime this is a discussion about the OPs antenna
mast; not a forum for personal attacks. The OP must earth
his antenna mast both for lightning protection AND as required
by the National Electrical Code. That answers his question.
Please feel free to address the purpose of this thread - the
Original Poster's original request for information -
Zeeeeeeee3 originally posted:

It has several times, which you have chosen to ignore. Use proper
grounds and disconnect his equipment from the antenna and mains.
Your answer is use proper grounds, but don't disconnect any equipment.
Now which one makes more sense? Which one would better protect his
equipment? Which one offers more protection?


Hey Lancer, don't make it too simple. It's all about "impedance", don'cha know?


Couldn't I get a correct impedance match with a 1/4 wave of bus bar?
Now what did he say the frequency of lightning was?


I don't think he did, but if you post an arbitrary value I'm sure he will
provide you with the correct information. I -do- know that lightning is
monitored by listening to the Schumann (sp?) resonance, which is a constantly
changing frequency down around 8 Hz. So let's see, we would need a ground strap
that is resonant over a frequency range of, say, around 1 to 20 Hz..... so how
much money are you willing to spend on this little project? Because the only way
I see of doing this is with a megawatt negative impedance converter!







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

Frank Gilliland wrote:
In , Lancer
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:04:05 -0800, Frank Gilliland
wrote:

In , Lancer
wrote:

On Sun, 15 Feb 2004 15:58:03 -0500, w_tom wrote:

A person who so poorly protected his own home as to suffer
completely unnecessary computer and TV damage will now teach
me? One who even posted the classic urban myth about concrete
damage to prove Ufer grounding does not work? You just
realized something: someone on the other side does have a few
decades of experience and engineering degrees. If you had
one, then the concept of resistance and impedance would have
been correctly posted. However someone even did read 'tower
talk' - and posted citations from 'tower talk' in direct
contradiction to your posted myths. Well at least you are not
posting personal attacks this time. The world can get better.

In the meantime this is a discussion about the OPs antenna
mast; not a forum for personal attacks. The OP must earth
his antenna mast both for lightning protection AND as required
by the National Electrical Code. That answers his question.
Please feel free to address the purpose of this thread - the
Original Poster's original request for information -
Zeeeeeeee3 originally posted:

It has several times, which you have chosen to ignore. Use proper
grounds and disconnect his equipment from the antenna and mains.
Your answer is use proper grounds, but don't disconnect any equipment.
Now which one makes more sense? Which one would better protect his
equipment? Which one offers more protection?


Hey Lancer, don't make it too simple. It's all about "impedance",
don'cha know?


Couldn't I get a correct impedance match with a 1/4 wave of bus bar?
Now what did he say the frequency of lightning was?

I don't think he did, but if you post an arbitrary value I'm sure he will
provide you with the correct information. I -do- know that lightning is
monitored by listening to the Schumann (sp?) resonance, which is a
constantly changing frequency down around 8 Hz. So let's see, we would
need a ground strap that is resonant over a frequency range of, say,
around 1 to 20 Hz..... so how much money are you willing to spend on this
little project? Because the only way I see of doing this is with a
megawatt negative impedance converter!

You guys are all over this topic and it's really blowing my hair
back.

Can you guy's condense it to your opinion of the best/cheapest
way to ground lets say..an omni on a roof-top or tower? Best
being a relative term.

I'm sure the advice will save at least one person from getting
blasted, and make people aware that you can't just put a hunk
of metal in the air without considering lightning.

Thx.

--
Go 40 42 12

In ,
wrote:

snip
You guys are all over this topic and it's really blowing my hair
back.

Can you guy's condense it to your opinion of the best/cheapest
way to ground lets say..an omni on a roof-top or tower? Best
being a relative term.

I'm sure the advice will save at least one person from getting
blasted, and make people aware that you can't just put a hunk
of metal in the air without considering lightning.

Thx.


Ok......

First, sink a ground rod at the point where the coax will enter the house. If
you have a basement next to the ground rod, sink a couple more rods so they are
separated by ten feet or more and in the path of the coax. Some people like to
prep the ground by soaking with sal****er, but in my experience that makes the
rod corrode before its time, then the salt leeches away into the ground water,
leaving a very poor ground in a very short time. I use galvanized pipe as
opposed to copper rods because they have a larger diameter (more rod-to-ground
contact = lower resistance), and they last longer. You can also thread the pipe
for a super-neat installation of a waterproof box......

Next is the coax installation. Run the coax down the mast or side of the house
to the ground rod. Don't run the coax near any wiring inside the house. You can
detect house wiring with a cheap metal detector. Avoid sharp turns as much as
possible. At the ground rod it helps to have a waterproof box because you need
to cut the coax, ground the shield, and shunt the center conductor to ground
with a choke (as per the diagram I made yesterday).

About the choke: This serves two purposes. First, it shunts static electricity
from the antenna to ground. Second, it provides a path for lightning if it
should strike. Since the lightning will arc across every loop in the choke, the
inductance value isn't critical just as long as it is high enough to block your
RF (about 1 mH or larger for HF and above), and the wire size is large enough to
handle some current (#14 or larger should be fine). One of those heavy-duty hash
chokes for ignition noise is ok, or you can wind your own -- use a large iron
bolt for a core and wind about 50 turns of #10 or #12 house wire. If you aren't
running much power, you can slit the insulation along the length of the coil so
it will arc at a lower voltage.

Then run the coax up into the house along side the grounding strap. Tie them
together with cable-ties if you want. Again, it's important that you run these
so they don't come close to any house wiring, and they should enter at a
location that is clear of easily combustible stuff. Terminate the ground strap
with a really big alligator clip, jumper cable clamp, or whatever you have that
makes a really good connection and can be easily disconnected. The ground clamp
from an arc welder is almost ideal.

Above the point where the coax and grounding strap enter the house, make a hook
or post where you can hang both when not being used. Remember that if lightning
hits, it's very possible that these will jump straight out from the wall and
dance around like a water hose, so make sure they are held securely in place.

Inside the house, make yourself a grounding bus bar of copper or aluminum. Put
this on the back of your bench and use it to ground all your equipment. To this
you clamp on your grounding strap. When not using your bench, unhook the
grounding strap along with the coax and stow it away. Also, to protect the coax,
use an appropriate socket and short it out before you stow it.

When should you unhook your antenna? There is a thing called the 30-30 rule: If
you hear thunder less than 30 seconds after you see the lightning, unplug. Don't
plug in again until 30 minutes after the last thunder. That's pretty safe. You
can even improve on that by building a lightning detector, many of which will
indicate lightning even before you can hear the thunder.


How's that?

Oh, I almost forgot..... coax length!!!!! The low impedance of the ground will
be reflected at the radio when the length of the coax & ground strap, from the
ground rod to the radio, are 1/2 wavelength. This means 1/2 wavelength -without-
consideration of velocity factor because we want a low impedance -ground-. And
this means -- you guessed it -- 18 feet of coax!







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----