(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing
is technically against the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a
portable station than from your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog poop?

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:


Peaking a radio is NOT recommended. It's

more trouble than it's

worth. Go with the small 2 pill amp, and let IT

do the work.

Dave

"Sandbagger"



Whhoops...no, ,,that's not it,,,this is where he advocates using a
linear instead of tweaking an export radio.






That's an export radio, so he's already a

criminal. So go ahead and

modify the clarifier!

Dave

"sandbagger"


Shux,,,taht's not it either,,,just more hypocrisy...



I'll stick with my TS amp. It seems to continue

to run with the best

of them....

Dave

"Sandbagger"

N3CVJ


Aw man,,I know it is here somehwere,,,,
Let's try again...


it is much safer for a CBer to run power from

the mobile. That way you never interfere with

the same people for very long.

Dave

"Sandbagger"



There ya' go,,,,read the entire thread if your communication deficit and
mild retardation prevents you from reading what he not only inferred,
but actually said, wrote and posted.
_

LOL..he also said this,,,,

Only people that

have something to hide need

to fear this loss of anonimity. (SIC)


LOL...you wear it well.....lmao!

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (I*Am*Not*George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:

N3CVJ said


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:


I'm hardly around much these days and you're STILL obsessing with me.
You have even taken to quoting me. I suppose that I could look at it
as a silent confirmation of the validity of my points. Or is it simply
a matter of the concepts of logic still eluding you?

What's that they say about imitation being the highest form of
flattery?

I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't want to wake up one
morning and see you camped out on my doorstep......

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days



In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post the
other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.
What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!




and you're STILL obsessing with me.



That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.



You have even taken to quoting me.

I suppose that I could look at it as a silent

confirmation of the validity of my points.



What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.



Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?




I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.



What's that they say about imitation being the

highest form of flattery?




Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!



I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't

want to wake up one morning and see you

camped out on my doorstep......

Dave

"Sandbagger"




You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (I*Am*Not*George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days



In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post the
other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.

I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know what you're talking
about. You really need to keep better track of the objects of your
obsession .

When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that I have little to
contribute to the group as it now stands. I do read posts on occasion
just to see if there might be something that may be of interest. The
point is that I do not post with the same frequency that I did in
years past.

What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!

That's the way you took it. They way I meant it should be fairly
obvious to anyone else who doesn't have a comprehensive disorder.


and you're STILL obsessing with me.



That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.


What in any of those quotes do you find hypocritical? I have always
maintained that certain activities are illegal. But if you are of the
mindset that you do not wish to abide by those rules, at least go
about it with a little common sense and keep a low profile. There's no
sense calling attention to yourself by interfering with your neighbors
or acting in a disrespectful manner, which would have the overall
effect of painting a big red bullseye on your forehead. So unless you
work for Target, that's not a good thing.




You have even taken to quoting me.

I suppose that I could look at it as a silent

confirmation of the validity of my points.



What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.

If that's true, then why do you keep bringing me up in past quotes? I
suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom of letting a sleeping dog
alone.


Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?


I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.


Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of your own? Do you always
base your principles on the quotes of others?


What's that they say about imitation being the

highest form of flattery?




Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!

If the shoe fits, Cinderella......





I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't

want to wake up one morning and see you

camped out on my doorstep......

Dave

"Sandbagger"




You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.

I don't expect you to understand, but trust me, I am not the one who
is messed up.

Dave
"Sandbagger"

From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days
=A0=A0In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post
the other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.

I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know

what you're talking about.



Tut-tut,,you most certainly have a "pal" in Michigan.....you even
claimed you were "intimately" familiar with N8WWM's behavior and
repeater jamming activity so if it wasn't your Michigan bud who made you
"intimately" aware of the happenings that YOU felt important ebough to
bring to this forum for discussion,,,,,then who?


You really need to keep better track of the

objects of your obsession .



One can understand how illustrating your hypocrisy would be misconstrued
by yourself as an "obsession" by another. It's a natural reaction from a
non-proactive individual.




When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that
I have little to contribute to the group as it now
stands.




You always have had the need to reclarify your positions, Dave,,,you're
not very clear in your communication skills..see, saying you are "not
hardly around' is nowhere near the same meaning as saying you have
little to contribute.",,but you of course, already know that...otherwise
the need wouldn't have existed for you to completely change what you
said.




I do read posts on occasion just to see if

there might be something that may be of

interest. The point is that I do not post with

the same frequency that I did in years past.



What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!


That's the way you took it.


Yes,,as that is exactly what you said.let's see it again, as it is
apparently paining you....

I'm hardly around much these days
_
They way I meant it should be fairly obvious to
anyone else who doesn't have a

comprehensive disorder.



Yea? Only "anyone" else isn;t looking to you for validation like you are
seeking..and I don't see "anyone else" coming to your defense who
misinterprets "I'm not hardly around these days" to be a synonym for "I
have little to contribute",,,LOL,,,,,,only those who live in their own
world and see things in their own manner and are unable to see things as
the majority can agree with that, Dave. The claims are so distant there
is no relation at all,,,,except in your mind.


and you're STILL obsessing with me.


That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.


What in any of those quotes do you find

hypocritical?



Your encouragement of others to break the law when you have cried like a
menstruating teen and callously attacked others for the exact same
behavior,,,merely giving information.


I have always maintained that

certain activities are illegal. But if you are of

the mindset that you do not wish to abide by

those rules, at least go about it with a little

common sense and keep a low profile.



This smacks in the face of what you have claimed in the past,
Dave,,you're two faced.

There's no sense calling attention to yourself

by interfering with your neighbors or acting in

a disrespectful manner,



Agreed, too bad you don't practice what you preach..as that hasn't
stopped you from acting in the most blatant disrespectful manner toward
others for beahvior you took part in.


which would have the overall effect of painting
a big red bullseye on your forehead.

So unless you work for Target, that's not a

good thing.




You've always cringed when your behavior was illustrated, Dave.

You have even taken to quoting me.

I suppose that I could look at it as a silent

confirmation of the validity of my points.


What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.


If that's true, then why do you keep bringing

me up in past quotes?



Because your PAST is very relevant, as you can not run from it, no
matter what you do or say. Again, what you do or don't do, is no
*longer' any consequence, in other words,,,your words and actions now
are all for naught,,your past behavior tells the entire story,
especially when you break your neck trying to change what you plainly
said to mean something entirely diffferent,,(snicker).



I suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom

of letting a sleeping dog alone.



But you;re not sleeping, Dave,,,you are up to your usual games and no
good,,it's why you lost YET ANOTHER ISP. I never wasnted any problems
with you Dave, adn told you so way back when...you should have heeded
the advice you now ask of another when the table has turned, but
sure,,,,I can leave it alone, Dave,,,let's see if you can.,,that
includes your sock puppets.



Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?


I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.


Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of

your own?



Sure,,,they were so profound they were responsible for you and the rest
of tream voobs downfall (read: snatched ISP's)..


Do you always base your principles on the

quotes of others?


No,,they arent my principles,,they are yours,,and eveyone knows I am
world champion of returning things to whence they came.


What's that they say about imitation being the

highest form of flattery?


Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!


If the shoe fits, Cinderella......


You can refer to a man as a woman all you wish,,it won;t help what ails
you.


I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't

want to wake up one morning and see you

camped out on my doorstep......

Dave

"Sandbagger"


You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.


I don't expect you to understand, but trust me,



You're a proven liar, Dave, and liars can not be trusted, so no, you
will not be trusted......now, you can continue to choose to attack the
messenger as has been your specialty,
and continue to play the victim after initiating rabid attacks, but you
will never get away with it again.


I am not the one who is messed up.

Dave

"Sandbagger"



S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs. I
gain much more satisfaction from having you share your beliefs with the
world.




The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong

In , while under the compulsion
to defend against every little nuance written about him that inflicts damage to
his delicate constitution, (Twistedhed) wrote:


S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs.


Then shut up already.







-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:29:26 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:

From: (Dave*Hall)
On Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (Dave*Hall)
On Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:29:15 -0500 (EST),
(Twistedhed) wrote:
From: (I*Am*Not*George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
I'm hardly around much these days
**In the first manner, you're always around, Dave. You made a post
the other day concerning an auction by your pal in Michigan.

I have no "pal" in Michigan, so I don't know

what you're talking about.



Tut-tut,,you most certainly have a "pal" in Michigan.....you even
claimed you were "intimately" familiar with N8WWM's behavior and
repeater jamming activity so if it wasn't your Michigan bud who made you
"intimately" aware of the happenings that YOU felt important ebough to
bring to this forum for discussion,,,,,then who?

You're on drugs again. I know nothing about Doug's activities. You're
confusing me with Leland. Like I said before, you need to keep better
track of your objects of admiration.



You really need to keep better track of the

objects of your obsession .



One can understand how illustrating your hypocrisy would be misconstrued
by yourself as an "obsession" by another. It's a natural reaction from a
non-proactive individual.

Did we learn a new word this week? Wouldn't it just be better to say
"reactive" rather than "non-proactive"?

Anytime someone regularly pulls up the past quotes of others, which
can span many years, goes beyond the bounds of "normal" an into the
realm of obsessive compulsive behavior.



When I say that I'm hardly around, I mean that
I have little to contribute to the group as it now
stands.




You always have had the need to reclarify your positions, Dave,,,you're
not very clear in your communication skills.

I can see why someone of your limited comprehensive ability would see
it that way.


.see, saying you are "not
hardly around' is nowhere near the same meaning as saying you have
little to contribute.",,but you of course, already know that...otherwise
the need wouldn't have existed for you to completely change what you
said.

To anyone else, who has even the slightest tendency toward a normal
personality, it would not be necessary to clarify what should be an
obvious statement. But one again your words underscore just how
irregular you are.



What a card, you are Dave. Your pious act of expecting anyone to believe
that you are no longer present but "just happened to be in the 'hood the
moment you were mentioned" is laughable...look.."hahahah"!


That's the way you took it.


Yes,,as that is exactly what you said.let's see it again, as it is
apparently paining you....

I'm hardly around much these days
_
They way I meant it should be fairly obvious to
anyone else who doesn't have a

comprehensive disorder.



Yea? Only "anyone" else isn;t looking to you for validation...........

The way you seem to be.

.....and I don't see "anyone else" coming to your defense who
misinterprets "I'm not hardly around these days" to be a synonym for "I
have little to contribute"

Because no one else care what you think, or what I may waste my time
saying back to you. But worry not, I'm ending this after this
response. You remain unworthy of rational discussion.



,,,LOL,,,,,,only those who live in their own
world and see things in their own manner and are unable to see things as
the majority can agree with that, Dave. The claims are so distant there
is no relation at all,,,,except in your mind.


Look in the mirror and repeat your previous statement.

and you're STILL obsessing with me.

That you consider references of your hypocrisy flattering, is exactly
what one expects.


What in any of those quotes do you find

hypocritical?



Your encouragement of others to break the law when you have cried like a
menstruating teen and callously attacked others for the exact same
behavior,,,merely giving information.


Where have I EVER "encouraged" people to break the law? You can't seem
to differentiate the difference between "encouraging" lawless
activity, and giving advice to "tread lightly".



I have always maintained that

certain activities are illegal. But if you are of

the mindset that you do not wish to abide by

those rules, at least go about it with a little

common sense and keep a low profile.



This smacks in the face of what you have claimed in the past,
Dave,,you're two faced.


Not at all to anyone with normal comprehensive skills. It's one thing
to state that a certain activity is illegal It's totally another to
acknowledge that the illegal activity exists, and how to be a good
neighbor and not be rude, ignorant, and disrespectful while doing it.

There's such a thing as the letter of the law. There's another thing
called the intent of the law. It is impractical to expect that
everyone will always adhere to the letter of the law in all cases. But
as long as you keep the intent of the law in mind, you will not be far
off the path. I don't expect you to understand this though.


There's no sense calling attention to yourself
by interfering with your neighbors or acting in
a disrespectful manner,

Agreed, too bad you don't practice what you preach..as that hasn't
stopped you from acting in the most blatant disrespectful manner toward
others for beahvior you took part in.

By calling something what it is? Hey, look, in the beginning, if
people were not so quick to deny that what they were doing was in fact
breaking federal laws, then there would be no need to keep reminding
them (you). If you would 've instead taken the attitude that "yea, I
know I break federal law, but I take steps to make sure that I'm not
interfering with other people", it would 've been a different story.

When you flaunt your actions by selectively breaking laws, as some
sort of God given "right" in everyone else's face, you essentially
make a mockery of our society. Those of us who respect the rule and
intent of law have a problem with that.

which would have the overall effect of painting
a big red bullseye on your forehead.

So unless you work for Target, that's not a

good thing.


You've always cringed when your behavior was illustrated, Dave.

Who's cringing?


You have even taken to quoting me.
I suppose that I could look at it as a silent
confirmation of the validity of my points.


What you choose to do or don't do is no longer any consequence.

If that's true, then why do you keep bringing
me up in past quotes?


Because your PAST is very relevant, as you can not run from it, no
matter what you do or say.

But why do you bring my name into a subject which has nothing to do
with me?

And I'm not running from the past, yet you seem to be the only one who
just doesn't get it. I've devoted a whole website to documenting the
best times that I've had in radio. Many of those activities were
somewhat illegal. Had I been busted then, then I would 've taken my
lumps like a man, instead of living in a state of denial, and
attempting to convince everyone else that what I was doing was
anything less than what it was.

And the funny thing about the past is that most people grow, and
mature as time goes on. Those reckless and irresponsible actions we
did as teenagers, we cringe about when we're parents ourselves. The
fact that I had engaged in illegal CB operation 20 years ago, does not
invalidate my right to point it out to others now. By your logic then,
a parent would have no right to discipline their children for the acts
that they themselves engaged in when they were kids.


Again, what you do or don't do, is no
*longer' any consequence, in other words,,,your words and actions now
are all for naught,,your past behavior tells the entire story,
especially when you break your neck trying to change what you plainly
said to mean something entirely diffferent,,(snicker).

Again, you are the only one who seems to care.


I suppose you don't subscribe to the wisdom
of letting a sleeping dog alone.



But you;re not sleeping, Dave,,,you are up to your usual games and no
good,,it's why you lost YET ANOTHER ISP.

Here we go again. First of all, what "games" am I allegedly up to? And
secondly what action(s) have I engaged in, would result in the loss of
an ISP?

I have had 2 ISP's in 9 years. That's the long and short of it.


I never wasnted any problems
with you Dave, adn told you so way back when...you should have heeded
the advice you now ask of another when the table has turned, but
sure,,,,I can leave it alone, Dave,,,let's see if you can.,,that
includes your sock puppets.


I have no control on what others do. You should know that.


Or is it simply a matter of the concepts of logic
still eluding you?


I merely point to your akc-compadre KC8LDO who claimed logic AND common
sense is nothing but a system of personal beliefs, often incorrect.

But what does that have to do with the topic at hand? Take it up with
Leland if you have an issue.



Tell me, do you have any original thoughts of
your own?



Sure,,,they were so profound they were responsible for you and the rest
of tream voobs downfall (read: snatched ISP's)..

Downfall? You mean that many of us got so tired of the childish
homosexual banter and ad-hominem attacks that we gave up posting?

The fact that you seem to think that ISP's were lost as a direct
result of actions on this newsgroup, underscores your either blatant
ignorance of internet rules, or is an example of the excessive
self-aggandizing of your relative importance in the grand scheme of
things.


Do you always base your principles on the
quotes of others?


No,,they arent my principles,,they are yours,,and eveyone knows I am
world champion of returning things to whence they came.

Whatever you think Walter Mitty. It would be helpful though, that
when you "return" things, that you return them to the proper people,
and in the original context. I understand that this may be beyond your
capability.


What's that they say about imitation being the
highest form of flattery?


Lookie, your deficit has you so downtrodden that you are hallucinating
you are being imitated,,,and loookie to who you blame,,,,LOL!


If the shoe fits, Cinderella......


You can refer to a man as a woman all you wish,,it won;t help what ails
you.

True. I can't reverse the affects of getting older.


I'm just glad you don't live near me. I wouldn't
want to wake up one morning and see you
camped out on my doorstep......


You and your little group of losers are the ONLY ones responsible for
harboring an unhealthy predilection toward posters activities outside
this newsgroup. You're just all messed up, Dave.


I don't expect you to understand, but trust me,


You're a proven liar, Dave, and liars can not be trusted, so no, you
will not be trusted.

No one with any credibility had proven anything with respect to my
truthfulness. YOU have attempted in the past to twist my words to fit
your own self contrived opinion. That would hardly pass as "proof" in
any venue which attempts to preserve an ounce of credibility.


.....now, you can continue to choose to attack the
messenger as has been your specialty,
and continue to play the victim after initiating rabid attacks, but you
will never get away with it again.

When the "messenger" has repeatedly demonstrated psychological
disorders which affect their ability to distinguish what is considered
proper behavior, then they become fair game for disclosure of said
dysfunctions. In this case, the "messenger" suffers from anti-social
personality disorder, with traces of narcissistic personality disorder
and a bit of obsessive compulsive disorder thrown in to paint a
complete picture.

When taken in the context of these issues, the validity and judgement
of the "messenger" is automatically suspect, and any conclusions that
arise from said individual should be considered as nothing more than
hearsay.



S'cool,,I'm not the slightest interested in changing your beliefs. I
gain much more satisfaction from having you share your beliefs with the
world.


Mr. Pot, meet Mr Kettle.


Dave
"Sandbagger"

(Twistedhed) wrote in message ...
From: (I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog

poop?


Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:
(snip)

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd causing trouble for Dave Hall
again. Is it because you two share the same first name.

From: (I=A0Am=A0Not=A0George)
(Twistedhed) wrote in message
...
From: (I Am Not George)
(Twistedhed) wrote:
N3CVJ said if you're gonna break the law, (dxing is technically against
the law on cb) 'tis better to do it from a portable station than from
your home.

Where did he say that you lying sack of dog poop?
Let's see....N3CVJ wrote:

(snip)

No snip, junior T-man..ask and you shall receive:


it is much safer for a CBer to run power from

the mobile. That way you never interfere with

the same people for very long.

Dave

"Sandbagger"

OMG you obsessed bag of parakeet turd



LOL....riiiiiiight! You ask for the quote,,I provide it,,,and it's my
fault that Dave Hall N3CVJ breaks the law, claims he doesn't and
encourages others to break FCC law. You poor, poor, self-defeated, soul.



causing trouble for Dave Hall again. Is it

because you two share the same first name.
_

LOL...do you practice at being so ignorant, impotent, and wrong, or does
it come naturally? Tailfeathers digested, yet? Hyuk!



Freedom is participation in power - Cicero

The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct
proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong