Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#11
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Frank Gillinad wrote:
And for the record, all high-tech gizmos designed to compensate for the inductive reactance of power and transmission lines during a lightning strike have failed miserably because lightning has no fixed frequency. Frequency has no relation to the success or failure of lightning protection devices in the manner you implied. You can verify this with your local power company or public library. Your posts are no more pertinent than any others,,,less, in fact, due to your inability to separate your personal issues and feelings from any relative discussion, illustrating you have yet to communicate effectively. You are not above any other,,,you have the option of tossing your ideas about and it's up to us, not you, to believe you or not. After being proved incorrect so many times, coupled with your usual hostility, one can plainly see supporters of your behavior appear to be limited to N3CVJ, N7VCF, KC8LDO, WA3MOJ, and N8WWM. The likelihood of one individual being correct increases in a direct proportion to the intensity with which others try to prove him wrong |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
Mobile Ant L match ? | Antenna | |||
X-terminator antenna | CB | |||
QST Article: An Easy to Build, Dual-Band Collinear Antenna | Antenna | |||
Dual Base Stations and One Antenna | CB |