Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#4
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Comments below:
"Twistedhed" wrote in message ... From: (I Am Not George) (Twistedhed) wrote in message ... http://www.caller.com/ccct/local_new...2692684,00.htm Bill Oglesby, 60, a licensed amateur ham radio operator for 45 years, is one of two internal club investigators who police members when transmission interference complaints occur. notice the hams police themselves. Ham clubs do not "police" anybody. Invidual hams *may* take advantage of the club's help when faced with such a situation. The "concept" WAS noticed. In reality, it never took hold,,the concept was and continues to be failure. The mere existence of the Rain report is testament. The RainReport is testament to the ARRL and individual hams' BEGGING AND PLEADING FOR enforcement, not some HAHAHA==look what happened to all those bad "hammies". I know it is a concept difficult for you to grasp, but we A S K E D for enforcement for years prior to Mr. Hollingsworth being assigned to the task. The RainReport began as a weekly report of enforcement actions that were sorely needed. NO one of us, despite your attempts to make some invalid comparison between the problems that face CB and/or Amateur Radio, ever said any different. Those outlaw ops, be he ham CBer, deserves what he gets In fact, Darrell Duckworth's reports are weeks apart at times. Lots of these reports, both on Rain, ARRL and AR Newsline are filled with citations to power companies for interference TO hams, not the other around. Warnings to hams continues to decline as the "bad" ops realize that they WILL be punished for their misdeeds. try and get a keyclown to even answer the door if he is interfering with someoneROTFLMAO You need make yourself more clear and use terms that are in the English dictionary and recognized as legitimate speech. Making up words and expecting others to acknowledge your baby-speak is what toddlers do when faced with a situation in which they have not the intellect to express themselves accordingly. One who reads the article finds that the problem lies with cheap Part 15 consumer electronics, and NOT with the ham, who appears in the article, to be operating completely within his legal parameters. These devices have a sticker that state that said electronics must accept interference from other sources---such as a legal Amateur OR CB radio. As long as the ham or CBer is operating his station legally, there isn't much the consumer can do. It is, however, just good sense and public relations to do all one can to help the neighbor. I've done it. People complain because they have never read that sticker and are quick to yell simply because they don't know any better. And, of course, it is human nature to point at the other fella. After all, it can't be *ME* that is wrong. Jerry |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FCC: Broadband Power Line Systems | Policy | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Broadcasting | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Dx | |||
Amateur Radio Newsline(tm) Report 1394 - April 30, 2004 | Dx | |||
IBOC interference complaint - advice? | Broadcasting |