Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#7
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
In , (MrTimNebo)
wrote: 50 watts rms on am sure beats 4 watts rms. why bother with 50 watts? Judging by it's overall size and wire thickness, it's probably only 50 watts peak. That means 12.5 watts RMS in AM which won't even double your range, and would just barely double the range in SSB. Hardly worth the effort when a better antenna will do the same job for both transmit AND receive. -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Forum | |||
FS: Ameritron ARB-702K Linear Amp Buffer | Boatanchors | |||
FS: Ameritron ARB-702K Linear Amp Buffer | Boatanchors | |||
Drake L-7 Linear parts | Equipment | |||
Drake L-7 Linear parts | Equipment | |||
RF amps: tuned load in Class A? | Homebrew |