Home |
Search |
Today's Posts |
#82
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote: Steveo wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote: Steveo wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it, is giving your acceptance of it. Hypocrite. Dave Hall wrote: Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the best. Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a tantrum and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures, rotflmao. Or send mail to your house........ Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing and threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he doesnt get his way he will have a tantrum. What are you babbling about now, you drunken fool? I want to send -YOU- some mail. That's not harassment, dumbass. I dont want you're mail so dont send it. anything recieved will be used against you in a legal proceding. SO.......YOU ARE WA3MOJ GEORGE BUSCH OF DEVON CIR. You finally have admitted it, you ****ing liar!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- I won't retire, but I might retread. |
#83
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() |
#84
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Dave Hall" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 12 May 2004 13:52:46 GMT, "Landshark" wrote: So what you are saying, in essence, is that people are well aware of the rules. If they choose to break them they will do so at their own risk. Yes Efforts to enforce the rules are a waste of time, since it will not stem the tide of irresponsible behavior. Is that about right? No. It is the job of the duly appointed Officer (Sheriff, constable, Highway Patrolman, Trooper) to enforce the laws, not me. Right, but it's the responsibility of every citizen to apply the social equivalent of peer pressure to those who refuse to "tow the line". This form of intimidation was widely employed in days long gone, but has largely been abandoned in this age of indifference. Dave, peer pressure might work among friends, but complete strangers couldn't give a rats ass. Do you think that this may be a part of the problem with society these days? No. I believe the problems lays in the up bring and teachings from Family & Friends in most cases. I would agree, and add that upbringing doesn't end at age 18. If no one is willing to support the laws, and instead place that job fully on the shoulders of LEO, is it any surprise that there are so many people willing to ignore those same laws? I think you should support the job that Law enforcement is doing, but that does not mean chasing down speeders and people that do break minor laws. People need to be made aware that "minor laws" are not always as "minor" as they may think. Many people believed that crimes such as cable TV theft of service were "minor" because what was being stolen was not physically tangible. But when the lost revenue for the cable companies were added to the picture, it's not such a "victimless" crime. Speeding, on the surface, does not seem to be a big deal either. But consider what can happen when there is a traffic mishap. Speed lessens reaction time, and increases the potential for damage and injury. Most laws were not created to ruin people's fun. They were created to protect society as a collective whole. There would be no reason for me to go chasing after a speeder and pull along side of him and start to berate him on how he was speeding. It would just **** him off and maybe create an even worse situation, road rage. Maybe so, but if people routinely did this, there would be a lot less people speeding, and the cops would have an easier job. Sorry, I'll disagree. Each to their own opinion Any cop will tell you not to confront a law breaker, call them and let them know, that is their job. Throw a ball in front of a speeding car, make him swerve, possibly crash, injure himself or someone other, you will be the law breaker, not the speeder. That would not be a good idea. But leaving a little "note" on the offender's car every time it happens, including the forwarding of their license number to the cops, might make someone think a little. To get a ticket, an officer must see the offence happen, just telling him that Jimmie was speeding won't do anything. Maybe if we all lived in Mayberry RFD something might happen, but not in this day & age. As a parent, I have become very conscious of people speeding through residential neighborhoods. I would hate to have my kid or an neighbor's kid fall victim to someone who's ignoring a "nuisance" law. Good Luck! I've gone to the city and county councils, tried to get the street closed at one end, to prevent all the people from speeding down my street to get over to their street faster, but not a chance. Speed bumps? Yeah right! I don't want to hear the sound of cars "jumping" the speed bumps at all hours of the night & day. So the best they can offer is "selective" enforcement, LOL!! Useless! Do we, as American citizens, not have a responsibility to stand up for what is right? Do we have a responsibility to instill the need to be more law abiding? Yes, but as for "enforcement" of most laws, that is the responsibility of the Police, not average Joe on the street. The police are given the jurisdiction to make arrests and levy fines. But we all share the responsibility to make it known that we will not stand by and allow these things to go on. By doing nothing, you are giving your passive condonation, which further re-enforced the attitude that breaking the law is "ok". Here's where we part company Dave....... I AM NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER! I will report it to the local authorities, hope that they handle it accordingly, that is the reason I pay taxes. Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it, is giving your acceptance of it. What event(s) took place that made it seem more "cool" to be a law breaking rebel, rather than someone who obeys the rules? Don't know, again up bringing, but look at it this way, if there were no traffic fines, cities, counties etc etc would be broke. A capitalist solution to a social problem. Turn the problem into a windfall. Maybe if the fines were raised sufficiently, people might be less inclined to take the risk. When did social responsibility give way to social indifference? Oh, mid 70's I would think. I would agree. I'm still waiting for the pendulum to swing back. Dave "Sandbagger" Landshark -- Courage is what it takes to stand up and speak; courage is also what it takes to sit down and listen. |
#85
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 May 2004 19:10:22 GMT, Steveo
wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it, is giving your acceptance of it. Hypocrite. Dave Hall wrote: Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the best. It's never too late to reform. I've readily admitted that I was one of the "bad boys" to some degree, back in my younger and somewhat socially irresponsible days. I was a product of the 60's and 70's, and it took a little time and maturity to finally put things into their proper perspective. I still enjoy talking about the technical aspects of radio, including things which operationally are illegal on CB, but interesting from an experimenter's standpoint. And my statement still stands. If you believe in something, you need to fight for it. Otherwise, you have no right to complain when things are not the way you like them. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
#86
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On Thu, 13 May 2004 03:43:39 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote: "Dave Hall" wrote in message news ![]() On Wed, 12 May 2004 13:52:46 GMT, "Landshark" wrote: So what you are saying, in essence, is that people are well aware of the rules. If they choose to break them they will do so at their own risk. Yes Efforts to enforce the rules are a waste of time, since it will not stem the tide of irresponsible behavior. Is that about right? No. It is the job of the duly appointed Officer (Sheriff, constable, Highway Patrolman, Trooper) to enforce the laws, not me. Right, but it's the responsibility of every citizen to apply the social equivalent of peer pressure to those who refuse to "tow the line". This form of intimidation was widely employed in days long gone, but has largely been abandoned in this age of indifference. Dave, peer pressure might work among friends, but complete strangers couldn't give a rats ass. You'd be surprised at just how many people's habits are influenced by the habits of other, complete strangers. Take a look at some of the ridiculous fashion trends over the years, which have nonetheless become popular, for the most obvious evidence of this peer influence. People need to be made aware that "minor laws" are not always as "minor" as they may think. Many people believed that crimes such as cable TV theft of service were "minor" because what was being stolen was not physically tangible. But when the lost revenue for the cable companies were added to the picture, it's not such a "victimless" crime. Speeding, on the surface, does not seem to be a big deal either. But consider what can happen when there is a traffic mishap. Speed lessens reaction time, and increases the potential for damage and injury. Most laws were not created to ruin people's fun. They were created to protect society as a collective whole. There would be no reason for me to go chasing after a speeder and pull along side of him and start to berate him on how he was speeding. It would just **** him off and maybe create an even worse situation, road rage. Maybe so, but if people routinely did this, there would be a lot less people speeding, and the cops would have an easier job. Sorry, I'll disagree. Each to their own opinion Ok, you have the right to disagree. Since you do not agree with my idea of active community involvement in awareness of laws, then what would you suggest that we, as a society, do to stem the rising tide of indifference to laws? Any cop will tell you not to confront a law breaker, call them and let them know, that is their job. Throw a ball in front of a speeding car, make him swerve, possibly crash, injure himself or someone other, you will be the law breaker, not the speeder. That would not be a good idea. But leaving a little "note" on the offender's car every time it happens, including the forwarding of their license number to the cops, might make someone think a little. To get a ticket, an officer must see the offence happen, just telling him that Jimmie was speeding won't do anything. Maybe if we all lived in Mayberry RFD something might happen, but not in this day & age. Maybe that needs to change to some degree. You're right of course, and that knowledge just enables lawbreakers. Perhaps if people could be cited without a LEO physically witnessing the offense, the problem would diminish. Technology offers yet another solution. GPS technology and OBD-II emission control systems can be integrated to the point where all functions of the car can be monitored. If the car travels down a road over the posted speed limit, it sends a little "On-Star" type message to a LEO, and a ticket in then issued. This has the added benefit of enabling the tracking of the car if it were to be stolen. This is similar to the idea of mounting cameras to take pictures of people running red lights. People will scream "Big Brother". But maybe that's what it takes when you can't trust people to behave on their own. As a parent, I have become very conscious of people speeding through residential neighborhoods. I would hate to have my kid or an neighbor's kid fall victim to someone who's ignoring a "nuisance" law. Good Luck! I've gone to the city and county councils, tried to get the street closed at one end, to prevent all the people from speeding down my street to get over to their street faster, but not a chance. Speed bumps? Yeah right! I don't want to hear the sound of cars "jumping" the speed bumps at all hours of the night & day. So the best they can offer is "selective" enforcement, LOL!! Useless! Hmm.... I'm not sure how I want to proceed here. On the one hand I can lambast you for your duplicitous position with regard to "selective" speeding (It's ok, just don't do it on my street). On the other hand, I might be tempted to say that you give up too easily. Politicians have to answer to the people, usually those who make the most noise. Record the problem. Present the issue to the town council, their decisions are public record. Make it known that if, at some point in the future, a kid does get killed due to a speeding car, that they can be held as a party to the crime, due to their negligence, and refusal to act to mitigate the situation in the face of irrefutable evidence. Do we, as American citizens, not have a responsibility to stand up for what is right? Do we have a responsibility to instill the need to be more law abiding? Yes, but as for "enforcement" of most laws, that is the responsibility of the Police, not average Joe on the street. The police are given the jurisdiction to make arrests and levy fines. But we all share the responsibility to make it known that we will not stand by and allow these things to go on. By doing nothing, you are giving your passive condonation, which further re-enforced the attitude that breaking the law is "ok". Here's where we part company Dave....... I AM NOT A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER! I will report it to the local authorities, hope that they handle it accordingly, that is the reason I pay taxes. We're not really parting company. I'm not advocating that you play cop. But reporting the issue repeatedly WILL get the attention of the LEO's, and the problem will get some attention. If nobody takes the responsibility to make those reports, the cops will think that all's well in happytown. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
#87
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 May 2004 12:42:14 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote: Steveo wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it, is giving your acceptance of it. Hypocrite. Dave Hall wrote: Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the best. Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a tantrum and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures, rotflmao. If he wants to drive all the way to my house, I'll at least have the courtesy to buy him a beer and ask him why he's so angry..... Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
#88
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
On 12 May 2004 12:56:54 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote: Steveo wrote: (I Am Not George) wrote: Steveo wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it, is giving your acceptance of it. Hypocrite. Dave Hall wrote: Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the best. Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a tantrum and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures, rotflmao. Or send mail to your house........ Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing and threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he doesnt get his way he will have a tantrum. He has no regard for laws, restraining orders, using the us mail for threats, etc. so be advised. If you are truly not who he thinks you are, then why worry if he sends mail? It will end up in the wrong place. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
#89
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]()
Dave Hall wrote:
On 12 May 2004 12:42:14 -0700, (I Am Not George) wrote: Steveo wrote: Dave Hall wrote: Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the guys advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to ignore it, is giving your acceptance of it. Hypocrite. Dave Hall wrote: Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp (Doesn't sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this works the best. Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a tantrum and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures, rotflmao. If he wants to drive all the way to my house, I'll at least have the courtesy to buy him a beer and ask him why he's so angry..... While the beer sounds good Dave, please pay no attention to our resident **** stir. I've done nothing that wasn't asked for by the two people whom I visited. -- I won't retire, but I might retread. |
#90
![]() |
|||
|
|||
![]() "Steveo" wrote in message ... FlavaFlav wrote: leland never said he was gonna key your car assflap. liar More lies. I won't retire, but I might retread. Hey dude, The history Channel had a show on muscle cars of the 60's and early seventies last night. Man, was that cool. All the cars with commercials from that era and designers & engineers giving commentary. Landshark -- Treat people as if they were what they ought to be and you will help them become what they are capable of becoming. |
Reply |
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Display Modes | |
|
|