Dave Hall wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:


It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster
concerning use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens on ham radio is irrelevant
to the cause of CB radio.

Except for the fact that certain hams like to come here to ****
with us CBers, and Jerry likes to post the enforcement logs.

So yes it is relevant.

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.

On 10 May 2004 11:58:10 GMT, Steveo
wrote:

Dave Hall wrote:
On Sat, 08 May 2004 13:50:35 GMT, "Landshark"
wrote:


"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

"Landshark" wrote in message
. com...

"Leland C. Scott" wrote in message
...

You forgot about these Lee:


It's totally irrelevant to the question by the original poster
concerning use of modified equipment on 11m.

Totally relevant, you made a post, I countered with one
of dozens of hams doing far worse things.

This is not a ham newsgroup. What happens on ham radio is irrelevant
to the cause of CB radio.

Except for the fact that certain hams like to come here to ****
with us CBers, and Jerry likes to post the enforcement logs.

So yes it is relevant.


FCC logs of enforcement action which pertains to illegal CB operation
is relevant to a CB newsgroup. Logs of similar action against illegal
hams is not relevant.

The fact that you view such information as "****ing with CB'ers" is a
perception issue.

Dave
"Sandbagger"
http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj

Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the
guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to
ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp
(Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this
works
the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a
tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures,
rotflmao.

Or send mail to your house........

Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing
and
threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he
doesnt
get his way he will have a tantrum.

What are you babbling about now, you drunken fool? I want to
send -YOU- some mail. That's not harassment, dumbass.

I dont want you're mail so dont send it. anything recieved will be
used against you in a legal proceding.

(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
(I Am Not George) wrote:
Steveo wrote:
Dave Hall wrote:
Like in the case of illegal CB use, it may seem that the
guys
advocating legal operation are grossly outnumbered, but to
ignore
it,
is giving your acceptance of it.

Hypocrite.

Dave Hall wrote:
Granted this turns a 800 watt peak amp into a 200 watt amp
(Doesn't
sound so glamourous), but for my type of operating, this
works
the
best.

Watch out Dave, if you disagree with this guy he will have a
tantrum
and drive to you're house and leave notes or take pictures,
rotflmao.

Or send mail to your house........

Dave there it is from the horses mouth, steve is openly harasing
and
threatening to harass hams in this NG he is like a child, if he
doesnt
get his way he will have a tantrum.

What are you babbling about now, you drunken fool? I want to
send -YOU- some mail. That's not harassment, dumbass.

I dont want you're mail so dont send it. anything recieved will be
used against you in a legal proceding.

SO.......YOU ARE WA3MOJ GEORGE BUSCH OF DEVON CIR. You finally
have admitted it, you ****ing liar!!!!!!!!!!!!!

--
I won't retire, but I might retread.