| Home |
| Search |
| Today's Posts |
|
|
|
#1
June 14th 04, 07:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Landshark wrote:
LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon, repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people hypocrites. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0La ndshark _ Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too. This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. |
|
#2
June 15th 04, 12:10 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
June 16th 04, 02:00 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Dave*Hall) On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:14:44 -0400, (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: Landshark wrote: LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon, repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people hypocrites. ****************Landshark _ Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too. ......hmmmm, when did I ever do that? I seem to recall as early as Jan of 2001 that I didn't agree with his methods, but I also pointed out that he was just mirroring the behavior of those that didn't like his pro-legal position. And one of those people (and probably several of your "internet personalities") was you, Twisty. If I was defending him then I was also defending you. So what are you whining about? This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. Oh really? I don't think I have ever typed "akc" in any of my posts until now. But just for kicks, let's see where this term originated: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...rp1. deja.com And if you want the first occurance of "AKC" in rrcb then: http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=e...1.news.aol.com So have you found a job yet? Or do you still make your mommy work two jobs to support you? ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 http://tinyurl.com/2sapq (Twisty cast the first stone) ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." "...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough." "Athis is how proper communication wroks..." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#6
June 16th 04, 05:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
In ,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Frank*Gilliland) This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. Oh really? I don't think I have ever typed "akc" in any of my posts until now. Results 1 - 10 of about 402 for "Sparky" "akc". (0.60 seconds)* Sorted by relevance* *Sort by date Related groups:**rec.radio.cb Very good, Twist. Now search through each one and count how many of those occurances were quoted from another post instead of typed by me. ============= http://tinyurl.com/ytcah http://tinyurl.com/2yor7 http://tinyurl.com/2sapq (Twisty cast the first stone) ============= "...but I admitted I was wrong, Like a man! Something you and QRM have a problem with. You guys are wrong and you both know it and are both too small to admit it." "...but as usual, your best simpl isn;t good enough." "Athis is how proper communication wroks..." ---- Twistedhed ---- ============= -----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =----- http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World! -----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =----- |
|
#7
June 17th 04, 03:31 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Frank=A0Gilliland)
In , (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Frank=A0Gilliland) This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. Oh really? I don't think I have ever typed "akc" in any of my posts until now. Results 1 - 10 of about 402 for "Sparky" "akc". (0.60 seconds)=A0 Sorted by relevance=A0 =A0Sort by date Related groups:=A0=A0rec.radio.cb Very good, Twist. LOL. Hey Frank, you should use a webtv somewhere some time. You're having problems following who's who and need to understand how the thing works. Now search through each one and count how many of those occurances were quoted from another post instead of typed by me. Process of elimination serves quite nicely here. Check only those in the search that are from you which contain the term "akc". You've used the term quite regularly. Sobriety would permit return of your retainment and not have you lying and claiming otherwise. |
|
#8
June 16th 04, 12:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:04:38 -0400,
(Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Dave*Hall) On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:14:44 -0400, (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: Landshark wrote: LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon, repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people hypocrites. ****************Landshark _ Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too. This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. I have also NEVER defended any actions that Doug has been proven guilty of. That's only because you claim those reported by the FCC on the rainreport do not constitute guilt of which the FCC claims.. You are the one who is quick to point out that a criminal is not a true criminal until convicted. Yet you seem to conveniently forget that when the shoe is on the other foot. Nevertheless,,,here are but a few of your defenses of Dogie. As pertaining to his bust, taken from "king of clowns busted" and "n8wwm makes rainreport"" N3CVJ wrote: " .......the complaint was withdrawn because there was either insufficient evidence, or it was shown that Doug was not the person doing the jamming." I was merely offering an alternative explanations. No,,the complaint was NOT withdrawn, as is standard procedure, Dogie was sent a warning via certified snail mail, like the majority of other first time offenders. And just how would you know what Doug received? Here's my personal favorite personification fo what makes you the grand mastah poobah who holds court in the Hypocrite Hall....the one of you justifying Dogie's illegal actions by pointing to others....... "Whatever he did, he did because he doesn't like people like you, who have little respect for the law. Taken out of context, in the manner in which you presented it, that could apply to just about anyone. Of course, we have the more entertaining, liberal, tear-jerking, choker you wrote in regards to Doug getting busted.... : I have a habit of standing up for the little guy, when a bunch of people gang up on them. especially when the little guy is right. Hahaha...no you don't Davie. In fact, you can illustrate NO thread, NO topic in which you "stood up for the little guy" where a " bunch of people gang up" on him. You obviously are incapable of finding them. In the very beginning, I took a stand against those who ganged up on CBers for no other reason than they were "different". Later on, when it became apparent that the tide had shifted, I took the stand to support the rights of legal operators. And Dogie was not right, at any time. Maybe not his methods, but his attitude with respect to illegal CB operators is pretty much on the mark. The ONLY people you have ever defended in here have been N8, Lelnad, and Frank. When you and other like minded simpletons bring unfounded accusations and pure unadulterated lies forth and attempt to present them as truth, then yes, I will defend the honor of those you wish to smear. In fact, google Dogie's call, along with "sandbagger" and you are right there in each and every thread, arguing vehemently and acting like Dogie's arm-chair lawyer If not an outright lie, it is an extreme exaggeration. I do not condone some of the things which have happened here that you have attributed to Doug (Which there is still no solid proof of). The fact that my name appears in the same thread means nothing. Google Doug's call and "Twistedhed", and you will see similar results. Does this mean that you defend Doug too? But,,,,let's illustrate how close you actually claimed you were to the situation........you wrote: "........there are people, that are in the know, that have filled me in on some of the smaller details". Yea so? Since I do not know the intimate details of the situation, certain people kindly brought me up to speed. The FCC were the ones "in the know",,,not your mysterious non-existent "people". The FCC was one party to one of the issues. But they were not the only ones involved. There are other people who personally know people involved with the alleged "jamming" incident. They are in a far better position to offer insight than guys like you who only know what you read on the internet. The complaint came from club members (those "in-the-know"). Now you're catching on....... And then here is the one where you claim it could be Chuck-eye who was impersonating Dogie to frame him and the possibility was being investigated by the FCC. That's a lie. I don't even know Chuck. Unless it was offered as a hypothetical speculation in response to something equally preposterous. ......hehhhehe......ah, never mind,,the post is there in those threads for all to enjoy,,,,, but don't say you didn't defend Dogie when he got busted. It's an outright lie. I haven't defended anyone. I have only offered alternative explanations for certain events. YOU, of all people, who stand up for the rights of criminals to be criminals, (until they are convicted!) to stand here and accuse me of refusing to drive a guilty stake through the heart of another person (who just happens to be someone you don't like) before all the facts are in and the courts have ruled. I guess by this logic then you really ARE a federal criminal. The sign of a true sociopath. Abandon core principles when it suits you. THAT sir, makes you a grade "A" hypocrite. Dave "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj |
|
#9
June 16th 04, 03:37 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
From: (Dave=A0Hall)
On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 17:04:38 -0400, (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: From: (Dave=A0Hall) On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 14:14:44 -0400, (Nicolai Carpathia) wrote: Landshark wrote: LOL!!! I love it. All I do is type Ditto to "LMAO" and notice Geo calls ME a hypocrite. He should talk, right BP. He defends Doug a known Felon, repeater jammer, porn poster, spammer, nut case. Leland defends Doug too, so George has no legs to stand on when calling other people hypocrites. =A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0La ndshark _ Frank and Hall and both ran to defend N8WWM on many occasions, too. This little group is what comprises the "akc" that Frank always refers. Hell, "AKC" is one of Frank's favorite terms,,google THAT term and see who pioneered it,,,Doug, Frank, Lelnad, Geogre, and Hall..in that order. I have also NEVER defended any actions that Doug has been proven guilty of. That's only because you claim those reported by the FCC on the rainreport do not constitute guilt of which the FCC claims.. You are the one who is quick to point out that a criminal is not a true criminal until convicted. Non-sequitur. Yet you seem to conveniently forget that when the shoe is on the other foot. It sure is,,each time the FCC makes a bust you agree with. _ Nevertheless,,,here are but a few of your defenses of Dogie. As pertaining to his bust, taken from "king of clowns busted" and "n8wwm makes rainreport"" N3CVJ wrote: " .......the complaint was withdrawn because there was either insufficient evidence, or it was shown that Doug was not the person doing the jamming." I was merely offering an alternative explanations. No,,the complaint was NOT withdrawn, as is standard procedure, Dogie was sent a warning via certified snail mail, like the majority of other first time offenders. And just how would you know what Doug received? What difference does that make? Try and remain relevant. The FCC lists all actions taken. You have maintained that once a person receives an NAL, that's it,,,you're guilty. You choose to agree with the FCC and their actions except when it occurs to one whom you defended vehemently. _ Here's my personal favorite personification fo what makes you the grand mastah poobah who holds court in the Hypocrite Hall....the one of you justifying Dogie's illegal actions by pointing to others....... "Whatever he did, he did because he doesn't like people like you, who have little respect for the law. Taken out of context, in the manner in which you presented it, that could apply to just about anyone. No Dave,,it's not taken out of context, as you referred to Dogie and his bust,,,,not "anyone". Yes, it could apply to just about anyone, but it applied to Dogie,,,,,so why attempt and obfuscate differently? You defended his behavior by pointing to another. In fact, you say it's MY fault for his behavior. _ Of course, we have the more entertaining, liberal, tear-jerking, choker you wrote in regards to Doug getting busted.... : I have a habit of standing up for the little guy, when a bunch of people gang up on them. especially when the little guy is right. Hahaha...no you don't Davie. In fact, you can illustrate NO thread, NO topic in which you "stood up for the little guy" where a " bunch of people gang up" on him. You obviously are incapable of finding them. In the very beginning, I took a stand against those who ganged up on CBers for no other reason than they were "different". Later on, when it became apparent that the tide had shifted, I took the stand to support the rights of legal operators. And Dogie was not right, at any time. Maybe not his methods, but his attitude with respect to illegal CB operators is pretty much on the mark. The ONLY people you have ever defended in here have been N8, Lelnad, and Frank. When you and other like minded simpletons bring unfounded accusations and pure unadulterated lies forth and attempt to present them as truth, then yes, I will defend the honor of those you wish to smear. =A0 Well, by all means, attempt to defend anyone you wish, but calling names is not the manner in which to justify your bull****, davie. That's almost as bad as pointing to another to justify one's behvavior. _ =A0In fact, google Dogie's call, along with "sandbagger" and you are right there in each and every thread, arguing vehemently and acting like Dogie's arm-chair lawyer If not an outright lie, it is an extreme exaggeration. I do not condone some of the things which have happened here that you have attributed to Doug (Which there is still no solid proof of). The fact that my name appears in the same thread means nothing. Google Doug's call and "Twistedhed", and you will see similar results. Does this mean that you defend Doug too? Difference is, once the google search is doen, one can read for themselves and see what took place, not what you tell people, as it has been illustrtaed time and time again that you say one thing and have to be shown you said the opposite at another point in time. In fact, your posts are chock full of contradictions and lies. _ But,,,,let's illustrate how close you actually claimed you were to the situation........you wrote: "........there are people, that are in the know, that have filled me in on some of the smaller details". Yea so? Since I do not know the intimate details of the situation, certain people kindly brought me up to speed. Yea? Tell ya' what...you name names and I'll name names..since you asked me first of how I knew what happened with Dogie.Who brought you up to speed, Davie,,,as only those involved know what took place...of course, one could read the FCC files, but you say that means nothing. _ The FCC were the ones "in the know",,,not your mysterious non-existent "people". The FCC was one party to one of the issues. But they were not the only ones involved. Same with just about every other action taken against those busted for interference. Of course there has to be other parties involved. Try and remain lucid and relevant. There are other people who personally know people involved with the alleged "jamming" incident. Damn,,,ya' think? They are in a far better position to offer insight than guys like you who only know what you read on the internet. There you go again,,ASSuming. The complaint came from club members (those "in-the-know"). Now you're catching on....... Catching on? Taht's rich. I'm the one that brought such to your attention back when you were talking **** and defending this felon. And then here is the one where you claim it could be Chuck-eye who was impersonating Dogie to frame him and the possibility was being investigated by the FCC. That's a lie. I don't even know Chuck. Unless it was offered as a hypothetical speculation in response to something equally preposterous. .. Whatever....,,it's there,,,you most certainly said it,,,,,,you also said it was your understanding that the FCC would investigate this angle........... .....hehhhehe......ah, never mind,,the post is there in those threads for all to enjoy,,,,, but don't say you didn't defend Dogie when he got busted. It's an outright lie. I haven't defended anyone. I have only offered alternative explanations for certain events. No Davie,,,,,you blamed me for Dogie's actions. You said he did what he did because of people like myself...that most certainly was not only a pathetic excuse, but a desperate and pathetic defense of one that was busted by the FCC. Odd how you always maintain one is a criminal for daring to speak about freebanding and talking dx, but when N8WWM is busted by the FCC, you offer reasons why he shouldn't be called a criminal. I am quite satisfied with your replies in this thread, Davie. You are shining. YOU, of all people, who stand up for the rights of criminals to be criminals, (until they are convicted!) to stand here and accuse me of refusing to drive a guilty stake through the heart of another person Here comes that exaggeration again you spoke of, davie. (who just happens to be someone you don't like) before all the facts are in and the courts have ruled. You are the one that ran to his defense. I didnt bring this matter to you,,,you entered yourself into the thread to blame me for n8's behaviors, case closed. I guess by this logic then you really ARE a federal criminal. Your logic. Only you and Geogre and Lelnad and Frank have called those who dx and freeband "federal criminals",..you have cried and cried that the term applies, illustratting your supreme ignorance of the term. Yet, when a federal entity (FCC), charged with carrying out punishments with no court hearings says N8WWM is guilty, you defend him, deny you did so, then defned him some more. Issues, Davie,,,,you have serious issues. The sign of a true sociopath. You're getting angry again and non-lucid. ASSuming status you neither have nor can attain is non-productive, delusional, and off-topic. Abandon core principles when it suits you. You have done just that by defending N8's repeated jamming actions while calling others a "federal criminal" for exercising their speech of topics of dx and freeband. A whack job and a hypocrite you are indeed. THAT sir, makes you a grade "A" hypocrite. Dave N3CVJ "Sandbagger" http://home.ptd.net/~n3cvj Forest for the trees,,no wonder you and Frank adhere to each other like dingleberries. |
| Reply |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | |||
| Inverted ground plane antenna: compared with normal GP and low dipole. | Antenna | |||
| Ideas for a home built 2meter/440 dual band base antenna | Antenna | |||
| FS: Connectors/Adapters/Meters/Etc. | Equipment | |||
| Need HF / Mobile Antenna Recommendation | Antenna | |||
| Wanted: SWAN Mobile Antenna Info | Antenna | |||
Hybrid Mode
