in wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

lol remember I said

if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over
like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air
coil model.

then asshole said

wrote
Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss
compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical.

now hoople head says

wrote
Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is
broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the
direction that its bent. Does your news server carry
alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there.
Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert

I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more
gain.
Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction
you
want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol

I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense
that
when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.


This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each
other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or
whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil
type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9
ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No
watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the
swang do it right this time.

On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

in wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

lol remember I said

if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over
like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air
coil model.

then asshole said

wrote
Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss
compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical.

now hoople head says

wrote
Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is
broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the
direction that its bent. Does your news server carry
alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there.
Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert

I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more
gain.
Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction
you
want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol

I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense
that
when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.


This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each
other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or
whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil
type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9
ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No
watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the
swang do it right this time.

LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are
both Frank too, he posts with ax.com..


What a dimwit.

In , Lancer
wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

in wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

lol remember I said

if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over
like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air
coil model.

then asshole said

wrote
Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss
compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical.

now hoople head says

wrote
Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is
broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the
direction that its bent. Does your news server carry
alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there.
Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert

I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more
gain.
Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction
you
want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol

I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense
that
when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.


This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each
other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or
whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil
type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9
ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No
watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the
swang do it right this time.

LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are
both Frank too, he posts with ax.com..


What a dimwit.


That's Twisty-logic. He thought Leland and myself were the same person
because we both posted through Supernews.






-----= Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!
-----== Over 100,000 Newsgroups - 19 Different Servers! =-----

From: (iamnotlancer2004)
In , Lancer
wrote:
On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:
in wrote:
On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:
lol remember I said
if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over like a
bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air coil model.
then asshole said
wrote
Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss compared
to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical.
now hoople head says
wrote
=A0=A0Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is broadside to the
antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the direction that its
bent. Does your news server carry alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a
jpeg of it there. Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert
I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more gain.
Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction you
want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol
_
I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense that
when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.
_
This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each other
and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or whatever
you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil type antenna
sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9 ft in a Barney
Bend configuration on the same police car. No watergates and whistling
auuudio into echo mikes and watching the swang do it right this time.


(LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are both
Frank too, he posts with ax.com..
What a dimwit. )

_
That's Twisty-logic.



Hehehe,,,poor Frank,,,invoking twist at all costs. Couple this with his
alcoholism and the old boy is off and runing.


He thought Leland and myself were the same

person because we both posted through

Supernews.




Yet, here you are blaming another for your own actions. The fact that
you felt such logic good enough to put into practice for yourself
illustrates your homage, but I like the manner which you need blame
someone else for your actions, to the point of sharing with us how
"Twisty-logic" has a hold of you and how Twistedmania has run wild on
you. Hope you find sobriety, Frank. You weren't nearly as obsessed with
me as you are when you drink. Each day and in all your posts, I'm in
your thoughts, emails,,,,lol,,,,,you do get a free pass on your
behavior, though, as alcoholism is a disease, thereby rendering you
incompetent and in need.



-----=3D Posted via Newsfeeds.Com, Uncensored Usenet News =3D-----
http://www.newsfeeds.com - The #1 Newsgroup Service in the World!

"Lancer" wrote in message
...
On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

in wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

lol remember I said

if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over
like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air
coil model.

then asshole said

wrote
Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss
compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical.

now hoople head says

wrote
Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is
broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the
direction that its bent. Does your news server carry
alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there.
Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert

I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more
gain.
Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction
you
want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol

I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense
that
when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.


This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each
other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or
whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil
type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9
ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No
watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the
swang do it right this time.

LOL!! what a dumbass, you don't know what ax.com is? Damn, We are
both Frank too, he posts with ax.com..


What a dimwit.

You mean he didn't know that was a post made
with Forte Agent? I thought George knew how to
read headers? LMAO!!!!

Landshark


--
Courage is what it takes to stand up
and speak; courage is also what it
takes to sit down and listen.

On 16 Jun 2004 13:01:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

in wrote:

On 16 Jun 2004 12:13:45 -0700, (I Am Not
George) wrote:

lol remember I said

if you want efficient youd be using a 9 ft whip. even bent over
like a bow the 9 ft is more efficient than a 4 ft loaded open air
coil model.

then asshole said

wrote
Huh......... A bent over 9 foot whip has a very noticeable Loss
compared to a efficient 4 or 5 foot vertical.

now hoople head says

wrote
Modeling, showed that the Max Horizontal field is
broadside to the antenna and Max vertical is more inline with the
direction that its bent. Does your news server carry
alt.binaries.pictures.radio? I put a jpeg of it there.
Red is The Hor field, Black is the Vert

I dont see any big loss there tnom I see only gain gain and more
gain.
Yes clip your whip Barney style and point the car in the direction
you
want to talk and you got gain, no illegal amp needed lol

I didn't write "modeling....." from above, but it is common sense
that
when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.


This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each
other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or
whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil
type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9
ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No
watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the
swang do it right this time.


By the way I already did a open coil simulation, the links were in one
of my first posts to this thread. The same links you read when you
responded to tnom about his tests.

when an antenna rotates away from its vertical polarization it also
rotates away from its original vertical gain.


This is really bizare Tnom and Lancer post within minutes of each
other and both from ax.com too lol. I tell you what tnom or lancer or
whatever you call youself now you need to model a 4 foot open coil
type antenna sitting on a Barney police car and compare it to a full 9
ft in a Barney Bend configuration on the same police car. No
watergates and whistling auuudio into echo mikes and watching the
swang do it right this time.

Are you paranoid.

iamnotlancer